NAF World Headquarters

Rules Questions - FF increase

Rottweilerrme - Sep 27, 2006 - 08:33 PM
Post subject: FF increase

In my first league game under 5.0, the question acured when both winning and loosing coach roll over there FF do both gwet to go up or just the winning coach. As I read it, it looks like onnly the winning coach gets the opertunnity. Very Happy

TuernRedvenom - Sep 28, 2006 - 03:16 AM
Post subject:

Winning can only go up or stay the same, losing can only go down or stay the same.

Rottweilerrme - Sep 28, 2006 - 08:19 AM
Post subject:

Wow thats harsh. But it does make it better for the team that causes 5 cas and wins 4-0 and there FF would still go down.

Primesupreme - Sep 28, 2006 - 08:38 PM
Post subject:

hmm didn't realize this

Dagaron - Sep 28, 2006 - 08:46 PM
Post subject:

Yeah we've been playing this incorrectly as well. Exclamation

Rottweilerrme - Sep 29, 2006 - 08:13 AM
Post subject:

I was about to miss use it. It seems almost unfair to the team that seem to not be able to win or just has a really hard shedule. But if you also think about what i said before you can dominate a game then loose FF.

Primesupreme - Sep 29, 2006 - 02:14 PM
Post subject:

yeah well I think a team that loses all the time but manages to do well against a obviously better team would still get some possibility to expand its fanbase

Rottweilerrme - Sep 29, 2006 - 10:02 PM
Post subject:

Thats what I thougth as well. Making it a little bit more possiable for the ones that are having a bad or just having a bad season.

Buggrit - Oct 03, 2006 - 04:41 AM
Post subject:

Win = Go up or stay the same
Lose = Stay the same or go Down

You can go up or down if you tie a match, just that you only get 2D6 to do it with instead of the 3D6 you get if you win.

Primesupreme - Oct 04, 2006 - 12:47 PM
Post subject:

Yeah I didn't believe it when I saw this in the forum. But it checks out...bummer

Styfen - Oct 07, 2006 - 03:19 AM
Post subject:

Gotta be honest, you don't want a high FF anyway. After around the 7 it just inflates your TV with minimal or no payback and a big part of LRB5 is trying to manage your TV as efficiently as possible.

Rottweilerrme - Oct 07, 2006 - 09:57 AM
Post subject:

So now FF has become over rated?

Quote:

After around the 7 it just inflates your TV with minimal or no payback and a big part of LRB5 is trying to manage your TV as efficiently as possible.

GalakStarscraper - Oct 09, 2006 - 08:14 AM
Post subject:

Primesupreme wrote:

yeah well I think a team that loses all the time but manages to do well against a obviously better team would still get some possibility to expand its fanbase

Ah but with the LRB 5.0 the idea is that there shouldn't ever be an obviously better team in any given match. That was one of JJ's design goals. The higher TV team should have a higher chance of winning but the goal was that the underdog would always have about a 1 in 3 chance of bring home the victory.

Galak

Spazzfist - Oct 09, 2006 - 09:15 AM
Post subject:

GalakStarscraper wrote:

The higher TV team should have a higher chance of winning but the goal was that the underdog would always have about a 1 in 3 chance of bring home the victory.

Galak

Even if they are an underdog team to begin with (e.g. halflings, goblins, vampires)?

Primesupreme - Oct 09, 2006 - 12:21 PM
Post subject:

Well let's not get crazy:P

Doubleskulls - Oct 09, 2006 - 09:39 PM
Post subject:

Spazzfist wrote:

GalakStarscraper wrote:

The higher TV team should have a higher chance of winning but the goal was that the underdog would always have about a 1 in 3 chance of bring home the victory.

Galak

Even if they are an underdog team to begin with (e.g. halflings, goblins, vampires)?

Nope. Gobbos & Flings were intended to win 20-25% of games at even TV. This should work proportionately so they'd win about 1/6 as significant underdogs.