NAF World Headquarters

Rules Questions - A bit confused...

SBG - Nov 19, 2008 - 05:04 PM
Post subject: A bit confused...

OK guys, I'M a bit confused.

I'm playing on the MBBL, this is where I might get lost. I though that Tomb Guardians, under LRB 5.0, were 3-5-1-8 Break Tackle Regeneration.

I thought that under the same rules, Flesh Golems in a Necromantic team were 100 K.

Is there a FAQ or errata I'm missing, cause I'm having questions from everywhere around here!

I got LRB 5.0, as well as the FAQ & Errata document. Is there something else I need. We are currently concluding our season before testing LRB 5b.

Fred

Darkson - Nov 19, 2008 - 07:02 PM
Post subject: Re: A bit confused...

SBG wrote:

I'm playing on the MBBL,

Why not ask on the MBBL forum?

Quote:

I though that Tomb Guardians, under LRB 5.0, were 3-5-1-8 Break Tackle Regeneration.

Nope, that was an experimental roster that's been dropped.

Quote:

I thought that under the same rules, Flesh Golems in a Necromantic team were 100 K.

Not under LRB5 - they are under LRB5b (the 2008 Rules Review), but the MBBL isn't starting that till Dec 1st.

SBG - Nov 19, 2008 - 10:20 PM
Post subject: Re: A bit confused...

Darkson wrote:

SBG wrote:

I'm playing on the MBBL,

Why not ask on the MBBL forum?

Darkson: I was saysing that this might explain my confusion. When I have a MBBL question, of course I ask it on the MBBL forum...

GalakStarscraper - Nov 20, 2008 - 11:28 AM
Post subject: Re: A bit confused...

SBG wrote:

OK guys, I'M a bit confused.

I'm playing on the MBBL, this is where I might get lost. I though that Tomb Guardians, under LRB 5.0, were 3-5-1-8 Break Tackle Regeneration.

LRB 5.0 Khemri should have Undead Mummy stats and the skeletons should be 30k and not have Thick Skull. The Break Tackle Mummies were experimental for a year and rejected during the most recent BBRC vote for another year of testing. A new roster has been put forward for the last year of testing.

Quote:

I thought that under the same rules, Flesh Golems in a Necromantic team were 100 K.

Not in LRB 5.0. That is an experimental change put in place by the 2007 Rules Review for testing for LRB 6.0 ... that testing was approved to continue for another year by the 2008 Rules Review.

Galak

SBG - Nov 21, 2008 - 08:07 PM
Post subject: RE: Re: A bit confused...

Thanks Galak.

Basically the FAQ & Errata doc. was the testing ground for LRB 6.0, with the new published book being the final testing rules before they get offically approved in roughly year. Do I get it right?

Fred

GalakStarscraper - Nov 23, 2008 - 01:45 PM
Post subject: Re: RE: Re: A bit confused...

SBG wrote:

Yes you have it right.

Galak