NAF World Headquarters

North America - Chaos Cup 2004, November 6, 2004 -- Chicago, IL

GalakStarscraper - Sep 27, 2004 - 11:35 AM
Post subject: Chaos Cup 2004, November 6, 2004 -- Chicago, IL
Here are the rules for this year's Chaos Cup (I just was sent the final PDF for the rules so wanted to share them ASAP with the forum):

      Quote:

Chaos Cup 2004 rules

TAKE ROOT
A new version of Take Root will be used instead of the version in the LRB 3.0:
Before taking any action roll a D6. On a 2+, the player may take his action as normal.
On a 1, the Player "takes root", and his MA is considered 0 until a touchdown is scored
or the half ends, or he is knocked over (and no, players from his own team may not try
and Block him in order to try to knock him over!). A player that has taken root may not
Go For It, be pushed back for any reason, or use any skill/trait that would allow him to
move out of his current square. The player may block adjacent players without follow-up.

PRO
Pro will be a General skill

MUMMIES
Mummies on the Undead team will cost 110k NOT 100k. IE this makes Mummies on BOTH the
Khemri and Undead teams have the same price of 110k.

EXPERIMENTAL TEAMS ALLOWED
The Chaos Cup will be allowing the current experimental Vampire and Ogre teams to play.
The vampire team will not be allowed to have the Head Coach play (only purchase Count Luthor).
So that all 18 official teams and the 2 experimental allowed for 20 total.

Rules for Ogre team:
0-12 Ogre 120,000 5 5 2 9 Mighty Blow Thick Skull, Throw Team-Mate, Bonehead --- Strength
0-6 Goblin 40,000 6 2 3 7 Dodge Right Stuff, Stunty --- Agility
Rerolls 70,000

Rules for Vampire team:
0-12 Thrall 40,000 6 3 3 7 --- General
0-6 Vampire 110,000 6 4 4 8 Hypnotic Gaze, Regenerate, Bloodthirst --- General, Agility, Strength
Rerolls 70,000 Apothecary can only be used on Thralls if purchased

New Racial Characteristic and Rules: Bloodthirst: Vampires must occasionally feed on the blood
of the living. Because of this, roll a D6 whenever a Vampire takes an action. On a 2+ the Vampire
may carry out the action as normal. On a '1', however, the Vampire is overcome by the desire to
drink Human blood; the Vampire loses their declared action for the turn and must instead take a
Move action. If the Vampire finishes the move standing adjacent to one or more Thralls, he attacks
one of them. Immediately roll for injury on the Thrall who has been attacked without making an Armor
roll. The injury will not cause a turnover unless the Thrall was holding the ball. If the Vampire is
not able to attack a Thrall (for any reason), then he is removed from the field and placed in his
team's Reserves box before his action is considered ended, and his team suffers a Turnover. If he
was holding the ball it bounces from the square he occupied when he was removed. If the Vampire is
Knocked Out or Injured before biting a Thrall, then he should be placed in the appropriate box of
the Dug Out instead of being placed in the Reserves box. Note that the Vampire is allowed to pick
up the football or do anything else they could normally do while taking a Move action, but must
bite a Thrall to avoid the Turnover.

NO GENERAL SKILL ACCESS
All players with starting Strength of 5 or more and Chaos Dwarf Bull Centaurs will be treated as
having Strength only skill access (instead of their normal General/Strength access).

GAINING SKILLS/RESETTING ROSTERS
The tournament will be 4 rounds of Swiss. Starting team will be 1,000,000. You will be allowed
your choice of giving 2 players each a normal skill or one player a doubles roll skill or mutation
after rounds 1 and 3. After round 2, you will be allowed to give one player a normal skill. A player
may not be given more than one new skill/trait during the entire tournament. All casualties that
have been inflicted on your team, including death, are wiped away at the end of the game. In other
words the team resets to your starting roster after every game. Skills accrued through the tournament
will not be lost, even if the player dies. Note: Apothecaries are still useful for bringing back
injured players during the game.

DICE
Before each game you and your opponent both agree to use ONLY ONE set of dice for the entire game ...
the other player puts his dice away where they cannot be used. If you cannot agree on the dice to be
used, a referee will decide by rolling for it. If you are superstitious about people touching your
lucky dice ... the tournament would like to suggest that you bring a different set of dice to the
tournament that you don't care if other people touch as this rule will be enforced.

WIZARDS
150k for a Wizard or a Dwarven Runesmith. Halflings get the Master Chef for free and can purchase
additional Chef rolls for 60k each as a permanent increase to the Chef's abilities. Undead and
Necromantic teams get their Necromancer for free, but may not purchase a normal wizard. Khemri
and Vampire teams may not have a wizard. To use the Necromantic/Undead Raise Dead spell during
a match, you must have an extra painted Zombie figure to represent this player during the game.

ILLEGAL PROCEDURE
The Chaos Cup will NOT be using the Illegal Procedure rule. If BOTH coaches agree to play with
the rule, they may use it. But if one or both do not wish to use the rule, then it will not be
used for the match.

MINIATURES/MUTATIONS
You team must contain only Games Workshop (GW) miniatures either Blood Bowl or converted from
another GW, Marauder, or Citadel range. All miniatures must be painted with a minimum of 2 colors
and the bases must be decorated or painted (at least green) or you will not be allowed to play.
Also mutations if you plan on having them on your team ... you MUST have a figure that clearly
shows the mutation to take it. You cannot give Claw to a Skaven Storm Vermin if you don't have a
football geared Skaven from some GW game system with a Claw for a hand.

SCORING

GAMES:
Win = 55 points
Tie = 35 points
Loss = 10 points

Blow out bonus (won by 2+ points) = +10 points
Keeping it close bonus (lost by 1 point) = +10 points
Smackdown bonus (Caused more casualties) = +10 points
Give and take (tied for casualties) = +5 points

PAINTING

+3 Based: All the bases in the team (including coaching staff) are painted and textured
in some manner. The baseline for texture is flock as a minimum. Just being painted green is not enough!

+3 Painted: The team is painted, all models have at least 3 colors on them. Different colors should be
used for different areas. Undercoats must not be visible.

+3 Detailed: All models have had the details of the model painted in a variety of colors or with
noticeable effects. This can be shading or highlighting, or 'black-lining' etc. This discriminates
between the merely painted team and the team that has had attention paid to it.

+6 Representative: All models on the team are representative of the race and position that they
are meant to portray. Extra weapons that are not part of a finished and painted figure should be
removed. This does not mean that you must use official Blood Bowl miniatures. Only that an Ogre
should look like an Ogre, a Dwarf should look like a Dwarf and so on.

Important: For all 4 of the above ... In order to get the full points for a category all the models
in the team must fulfill the criteria. If even one fails, the points can't be scored. The team
voted best overall painted team by the coaches playing in the tournament over lunch will receive an
extra 5 Painting points. The head referee and his assistants will choose the teams eligible for this
voting during the morning. You must have painted your own team to be eligible for the best painted
voting (however, teams painted by another person can still earn the full 15 normal painting points).

SPORTSMANSHIP
At the end of the tournament, coaches will rank players from most to least sporting with a 1 being
most sporting and a 4 being least ... points for each of these 4 votes will score points as follows:

1st 13 points
2nd 10 points
3rd 6 points
4th 3 points

If you have an opponent who drops out without voting you will receive 8 points from that coach.

STAR PLAYERS

If two of the same stars show up for a game, neither star will play. Note STARs do not have positions
at all, so a Human team can have 4 Blitzers and Griff, or a Halfling team could have 2 Treemen and Deeproot.
The Star Players have new costs and team assignments for that must be used for the Chaos Cup:
-- Bomber Dribblesnot ??? Orc or Goblin ??? 80,000
-- Count Luthor von Drakenborg ... Human, Necromantic, Undead, or Vampire ... 350,000
-- Deathroller ??? Dwarf ??? 160,000
-- Deeproot Strongbranch ... Halfling or Wood Elf ... 250,000
-- Fungus the Loon ??? Orc or Goblin ??? 60,000
-- Grashnak Blackhoof ... Chaos, Chaos Dwarf, or Norse ... 320,000
-- Griff Oberwald ... Human ... 360,000
-- Grim Ironjaw ... Dwarf ... 220,000
-- Hakflem Skuttlespike ... Skaven ... 230,000
-- Headsplitter ... Skaven ... 350,000
-- Horkon Heartripper ??? Dark Elf ??? 120,000
-- Hthark the Unstoppable ... Chaos Dwarf ... 340,000
-- Jordell Freshbreeze ... Elf or Wood Elf ... 230,000
-- Lord Borak the Despoiler ... Chaos ... 250,000
-- Mighty Zug ... Human ... 180,000
-- Morg `N??? Thorg ... ANY team except Goblin and Halfling may take Morg `N??? Thorg ... 420,000
-- Nobbla Blackwort ??? Orc, Goblin, or Chaos ??? 80,000
-- Prince Moranion ... Elf or High Elf ... 190,000
-- Ramtut III ... Khemri, Necromantic, or Undead ... 360,000
-- `Ripper??? Bolgrot ... Orc, Goblin, or Chaos ... 200,000
-- Scrappa Sorehead ??? Orc, Goblin, or Chaos ??? 60,000
-- Silibili ... Lizardman ... 240,000
-- Thrud the Barbarian ... Any team may take Thrud ... 200,000
-- Varag Ghoul-Chewer ... Orc ... 250,000
-- Zara the Slayer ... Amazon, Dwarf, Norse, or Human ... 270,000

Clarification: Zara's Stakes will effect ANY player on a Khemri, Necromantic, Undead, or Vampire team.
===========================================================================
Thank you for participating in the 2004 Chaos Cup.

IMPORTANT!
Competitors are advised that from the moment of entry into the event the decisions of all Judges,
Referees and members of Games Workshop staff regarding the fair adjudication of the Tournament rules,
and all issues of health and safety, are final. No discussions will be entered into once a decision
is taken. This applies to rules adjudications, the scores applied for any category of the Tournament,
painting judging, and any issues that require the cooperation of the competitors. Once the Tournament
results are published, we cannot alter them in any way. Any breach of this will be considered a Red
Card offence at the Tournament.

If you have any questions regarding the event then please email: joe.krone@games-workshop.com with
Chaos Cup Tournament in the subject heading.

ENTRY TICKET
Tickets will be available for purchase the day of the tournament. The tournament will cost $10 and
unless players bring extra boards we will only have space for 40 players so make sure you arrive early.

THINGS YOU NEED TO BRING
??? Your Chaos Cup rules pack (these pages)
??? Your PAINTED team
??? Two copies of your team roster (one of these must be given to the Chaos Cup organizers when you register)
??? Blocking dice, D6 and D8 dice
??? Throw-in, Scatter and Pass templates
??? Turn Markers, Reroll Counters, and a game ball (painted).
??? A Blood Bowl pitch (if you want). We have 20 boards so unless some players bring boards we will
sell out the tournament at 40 players.
??? Pen & paper
??? Your NAF number (if you have one). This tournament is NAF sanctioned. If you want to join the NAF
BEFORE the tournament, go to http://www.bloodbowl.net
??? If possible as well, a Living Rule Book (LRB) 3.0 print-out or Blood Bowl Handbook

THE VENUE
The tournament will be held at Chicago Battle Bunker in 1524A Butterfield Rd, Downer???s Grove, Illinois, 60515
on November 6th. Phone Number: 630-426-0120
For more detailed information, go to http://www.adeptuswindycity.com for the event or email Joe Krone,
GW Midwest Promotions Manager at joe.krone@games-workshop.com


SCHEDULE
9.00am-10.00am Entry and Registration
10.00am-Noon Game 1
Noon-1.00pm Lunch Break
1.00pm-3.00pm Game 2
3.00pm-3.30pm Break
3.30pm-5.30pm Game 3
5:30pm-6:30pm Supper Break
6:30pm-8:30pm Game 4
8:30pm-9:15pm Break/Calculate Final Standings
9:15pm-9:45pm Awards/Wrap-Up

Please be on time for registration, you HAVE to be ready to begin by 10am, NO LATER! As you can see the
timetable is quite tight so I would ask that you play at a brisk pace. If your opponent is taking a long
time for his turn then remind him that the four minute rule is in play. The schedule is subject to change
if the event organisers need to.

FORMAT
The Tournament is played over just Saturday. You will participate in a series of four games. After each
game you will play against a different opponent. In the first round, players will be matched randomly
against an opponent. After that, in each round the two players in 1st and 2nd place (based on their
points for coaching) will play each other, the players in 3rd and 4th place will play each other,
the players in 5th and 6th place will play each other, and so on. The only exception is that you can
never play the same opponent twice; should this happen a referee will step in and sort things out so
that the players face fresh opponents of a suitable calibre. This usually means moving you either up
or down the tables to swap you around - it isn't THAT critical as to exactly which table you're on,
as long as you play a relatively well-matched opponent. Once your opponent has been determined you
will be assigned a table. The event organisers will provide no other games equipment and the players
must provide all other materials. You must bring along a copy of the Blood Bowl rules, as well as
copies of any material you will be using so that your opponent can check any special rules and
characteristics that apply to your team.

To keep on schedule, we would appreciate it if you could play at quite a brisk pace with no time wasting please!

Each player has a special results card. Once you've finished your game, you must fill in the card and
then hand it in at the information desk. It is important you fill all the information in as this will
decide your ranking and ultimately the winner of the Tournament. Your results will then be entered into
the tournament database.

THE AWARDS
As well as the Blood Bowl winner, 2nd and 3rd place, other prizes will be awarded for Best Sportsman,
Best Painted Team, Most Touchdowns, Fewest Touchdowns Allowed, and Most Casualties Caused.

THE TOURNAMENT RULES
The rules from the latest edition of the Living Rulebook (available free from www.BloodBowl.com) are
to be used unless specifically stated below.

Only the official teams as of the 2003 rules review AND the Ogre and Vampire teams may be entered.
To clarify so there is no doubt these are: Human, Orc, Dwarf, High Elf, Skaven, Dark Elf, Chaos,
Undead, Chaos Dwarf, Goblin, Halfling, Wood Elf, Norse, Lizardman, Khemri, Nurgle, Necromantic, Elf and Amazon.
With Ogres and Vampires allowed as well.

No other teams are allowed. Teams must be written out on the official Blood Bowl team roster pad or
through any of the numerous software programs available for team sheet creation. You must bring two copies,
give one to the officials at registration and keep the other for your own reference.

Make sure your team is correct as team rosters will be checked. Any mistakes found after registration
(even if not deliberate) will result in that player getting a yellow card.

REFEREES
The primary purpose of our Tournament is to get together for the day, so that we can play our favourite
game and meet other players who share our interests. Finding 'champion players' of our games is a
by-product of this, and we're really much more interested in creating a quality gaming experience for
all the people that take part, where they get to play lots of games and meet a whole bunch of new players.

This being said we do understand that sometimes even the friendliest of players can lose their cool,
especially if the dice have been going against them all day. The most common causes of friction in a
game are questions about the rules of the game. Rules questions arise in most games of Blood Bowl,
both because the huge number of variables involved in the game make it just about impossible for the
rulebook to cover every situation that might occur, and because different people interpret the rules
in different ways. In order to avoid arguments we recommend that you refer to the appropriate rulebook
as soon as a question arises. If the rules do not cover the situation, then roll a dice to decide what
happens. In other words, a friendly dice roll should decide any question that cannot be answered by
referring to the rules.

Please note that there is absolutely nothing wrong with asking an opponent if they can show you the
appropriate rule or set of characteristics so that you can check for yourself that everything is being
done correctly. All we require is that you ask nicely and politely, and that you do your best to sort
out any problems yourselves!

If you really want a Referee to sort out a rules question, then you are free to call one over, and our
Referees may intervene if they see an argument. Be warned, however, that our Referees are under strict
instructions to give players one of two answers to any question they are asked:

1. They will show you the rule in its relevant place in the rulebook.

2. To roll a D6 to sort out any rules problems not solved by the above. You should also note that the
prime duty of our Referees is to make sure that the majority of players in the tournament get a nice
friendly game where winning is secondary to having a good time. Anyone who keeps on spoiling a game with
picky rules questions or who consistently bends the rules in their favour will be asked to desist or
suffer the consequences.

Referees will have a simple card system to adjudicate this kind of ruling:

YELLOW: A Yellow Card will be shown to the player(s) and their player number and name logged. In addition,
50 points will be taken from a booked player's Tournament totals.

RED: A Red Card will be shown to the player(s) and their player number and name logged. In addition,
100 points will be taken from a booked player's Tournament totals.

The decision of the Chief Referee is final, and no discussion will be entered into. Arguing with the
Chief Referee following a decision will be a RED CARD offence


Galak
Zombie - Sep 27, 2004 - 01:06 PM
Post subject:
The vault sneaking into GW tournaments. That's one more tournament i certainly won't attend. Not that i'd want to attend a one-day tournament anyway...
Spazzfist - Sep 27, 2004 - 02:04 PM
Post subject:
      Zombie wrote:
The vault sneaking into GW tournaments. That's one more tournament i certainly won't attend. Not that i'd want to attend a one-day tournament anyway...


Jeez Zombie, didn't your mama tell you what you should do if you don't have something nice to say? Rolling Eyes

Sounds like a lot of fun guys, and it looks like you put a lot of thought into this one! I will see what I can do about attending!


Spazz
GalakStarscraper - Sep 27, 2004 - 02:08 PM
Post subject:
Xtreme ... if you want to ... I'll split the ride up to the tournament with you and the cost of a room the night before.

I'm going up late though ... like leaving Indy at 9:00 pm. But if you are interested let me know. Its another shot for your Ogres to compete for Best Painted and get some more game in.

I'm trying to convert the Treemen for my Fling team since the Ogres are no longer street legal.

And Zombie ... just for the record the above isn't the Vault slipping into GW tournaments ... those items above were changes that were coming to the LRB 4.0 WAY before the Vault was ever even a suggestion.

Galak
Trog - Sep 27, 2004 - 02:46 PM
Post subject:
Sounds good, we've got a group coming up from Springfield, MO on Friday.

Looking forward to it.
Zombie - Sep 27, 2004 - 03:12 PM
Post subject:
      GalakStarscraper wrote:
And Zombie ... just for the record the above isn't the Vault slipping into GW tournaments ... those items above were changes that were coming to the LRB 4.0 WAY before the Vault was ever even a suggestion.


All i know is that they weren't at the Spike!, and i'm glad they weren't!
GalakStarscraper - Sep 27, 2004 - 03:13 PM
Post subject:
      Spazzfist wrote:
it looks like you put a lot of thought into this one! I will see what I can do about attending!
Those rules the Chaos Cup is using should look familar to some tournament players.

Galak
CyberHare - Sep 27, 2004 - 03:33 PM
Post subject:
      GalakStarscraper wrote:
Those rules the Chaos Cup is using should look familar to some tournament players.


Yeah I seem to recognize that painting points system from somewhere Smile

I think they're giving a few too many points for it though. But then I guess GW wants to put more emphasis on the painting aspect of the hobby than the game play. Not a bad thing just not the way I would have done it. That's the beauty of the tourney system that is evelvng though. It can be used for many tournament setups and give each their own individual flair simply by changing the points value for different area's of the game.
GalakStarscraper - Sep 27, 2004 - 03:56 PM
Post subject:
      CyberHare wrote:
I think they're giving a few too many points for it though.


I guess I don't see the painting points as really having that much impact overall. In the system in total you have this break down:

Points from games (average): 81%
Points from sportsmanship: 14%
Points from painting: 5%

Using the points from the last tournament using this system it broke down this way for 4 games when you total all the player points that played all 4 games (46 total players ... 41 players finishing all 4 games)

Points from games: 79%
Points from sportsmanship: 15%
Points from painting: 6%

Out of the top 6 players out of the 46:

Points from games (average): 83%
Points from sportsmanship: 12%
Points from painting: 5%

========================================

The other factor I look at is that only 10 of the 46 players received less than the full 15 points for painting and of those 10 ... the only player in the top 20 where the 5 or more points he lost from painting matter would have moved him from 19th to 18th place in the tournament.

You could in theory lose a tournament with this system if you showed up with really poorly painted figs ... but practically speaking ... its not a big risk item. The ranking system that Underworld Cup uses has a much bigger chance of causing changes to ranking in a tournament based on painting since it quite easy to lose painting points with the method John uses.

Galak
Zombie - Sep 27, 2004 - 04:03 PM
Post subject:
You can't look at it this way. If a loss was worth 210 points and a win was worth 255 points, then of course people would get more points on average for their games than for their painting. But the total points for grabs for a single game would still only be 45 points, the other 210 points being handed out for free. You could say these 210 points are given for writing your name down on your roster for all it's worth, and then say that putting your name down is what provided the most points. In fact, it didn't provide any points at all and neither did a loss.
Zombie - Sep 27, 2004 - 04:12 PM
Post subject:
The truth of the matter is that at the chaos cup, there will be

45 x 4 points up for grabs for winning
20 x 4 points up for grabs for CAS and TD bonuses
10 x 4 points up for grabs for sportsmanship
15 points up for grabs for painting
for a possible total of 315 points, plus the 52 free points given out to everyone.

That's
57% for winning games
25% for scoring TDs and CAS
13% for sportsmanship
5% for painting.

Arguably that's close to what you posted because only 52 of 367 points are given out for free and shouldn't count in the calculation, but it's still worth pointing out how things should be calculated.
GalakStarscraper - Sep 27, 2004 - 04:19 PM
Post subject:
I agree your math is more accurate Zombie ... I think you've got one small hole in the math though.

There is an additional 12 free points from sportsmanship as everyone gets that many for a total of 52 free points in the system you get just for playing 4 games in the tournament (ie as you put it signing your name).

I would also argue that 6 of the 15 points for painting are free since all you have to do to get those is show up with the right team (since bare metal teams can get the 6 points for Representation ... I would hope that folks could do this much ... but I'll agree that it is possible to lose even these so they are not truely free).

But for the points up for grabs I agree ... however ... as you stated ... even with better math ... your numbers and mine are within 1% point of each other.

Galak
Zombie - Sep 27, 2004 - 04:22 PM
Post subject:
Since Brian is making the argument that painting has too much value, let's compare this with his Death Bowl and see what transpires :

30 x 5 + 10 points for winning games
20 x 5 points for CAS and TD bonuses
4 x 6 points for sportsmanship
10 points for painting
for a total of 296 points plus 116 given away for free to everyone.

This gives us :
54% for winning games
34% for TDs and CAS
8% for sportsmanship
3% for painting

What i see here is that Brian likes to give more weight to bonuses and less to sportsmanship and painting.
Zombie - Sep 27, 2004 - 04:24 PM
Post subject:
      GalakStarscraper wrote:
There is an additional 12 free points from sportsmanship as everyone gets that many.


You're right, i forgot those. This means 52 free points total instead of 40. I'll change it now. However, since free points don't (and shouldn't) enter into consideration, that doesn't change anything else in the post.
GalakStarscraper - Sep 27, 2004 - 04:40 PM
Post subject:
      Zombie wrote:
What i see here is that Brian likes to give more weight to bonuses and less to sportsmanship and painting.


Hmmm actually if you look at the % changes ... he taking from every category to pump up extras ... that's fine ... as he said different tournament stress different things. But I don't believe a 1.4% difference in painting points is a major difference point in painting points allowed between the Chaos Cup and the Death Bowl ... at least not enough that I think it deserved comment there Brian .. Laughing Wink

Change from Chaos Cup to the Death Bowl
-2.7% for winning games
+8.6% for TDs and CAS
-4.5% for sportsmanship
-1.4% for painting

Galak
CyberHare - Sep 27, 2004 - 04:45 PM
Post subject:
Oh no they've brought out.. "THE MATH" Wink

Like I said, it's not bad just not the way I would do it. As Zombie's math shows I do indeed put more emphasis on the game bonuses at the DB. It should also be noted though that at last years DB, as Zombie well knows, he only got into the Championship round because someone else didn't base their figs. Had he bothered to put a little flock on his bases it would have been a lizard team in the finals instead of Zombie's Norse. So it can make a difference.
Zombie - Sep 27, 2004 - 04:52 PM
Post subject:
You're pulling a Chet here Galak.

You know full well that percentages can't be compared like that. It's not a 1.4% drop in painting points, but more like a 30% drop or something like that.

Similarly, the drop in points for winning is minimal compared to the total points allocated to that.
KarlLagerbottom - Sep 27, 2004 - 04:53 PM
Post subject:
Brian-
Funny in all of his mathematical analysis he forgot to mention that tidbit. Very Happy

-Rob
Zombie - Sep 27, 2004 - 04:55 PM
Post subject:
I actually almost did but i didn't want to argue for either side. I wanted my post to remain objective and only put numbers forward.

Because of my view regarding miniatures, painting, etc, i'm not in a good position to debate on the matter.
Grumbledook - Sep 27, 2004 - 05:40 PM
Post subject:
at the end of the day you gotta win your games

argue over the rules all you want, some of us just play by them
Zombie - Sep 27, 2004 - 06:50 PM
Post subject:
Well Grumble, that's the difference between organizing tournaments and just playing in them!
KarlLagerbottom - Sep 27, 2004 - 06:55 PM
Post subject:
Zombie-
Does that mean that you are organizing an MTL Tourney as well? Let me know I might come up for that. Unless you are talking about the DeathBowl... which I believe is Brian's baby.

-Rob
Zombie - Sep 27, 2004 - 06:58 PM
Post subject:
I might organize one, if the Double Bowl idea i told you about gets positive response.
crazylegs - Sep 27, 2004 - 09:03 PM
Post subject:
      Quote:
Only the official teams as of the 2003 rules review AND the Ogre and Vampire teams may be entered.
To clarify so there is no doubt these are: Human, Orc, Dwarf, High Elf, Skaven, Dark Elf, Chaos,
Undead, Chaos Dwarf, Goblin, Halfling, Wood Elf, Norse, Lizardman, Khemri, Nurgle, Elf and Amazon.
With Ogres and Vampires allowed as well.


Nurgle's Rotters and the Necro team are official teams as well, correct? Is this just an oversight, or are they really not allowing them?
Zombie - Sep 27, 2004 - 10:20 PM
Post subject:
Nurgle is listed, Necro i think was an oversight.
Xtreme - Sep 27, 2004 - 10:47 PM
Post subject:
edit
My questions were answered in the rules packet. Embarassed

So we can't get tickets in advance then?
GalakStarscraper - Sep 28, 2004 - 06:33 AM
Post subject:
      crazylegs wrote:
Nurgle's Rotters and the Necro team are official teams as well, correct? Is this just an oversight, or are they really not allowing them?
As Zombie said ... Nurgle is listed ... Necro is a typo ... I'll let them know.

Galak
GalakStarscraper - Sep 28, 2004 - 06:34 AM
Post subject:
And no ... I don't think you can purchase tickets in advance.

Galak
crazylegs - Sep 28, 2004 - 07:13 AM
Post subject:
thanks, sorry about missing Nurgle. I've got to stop reading these at 1:00am...
GalakStarscraper - Sep 28, 2004 - 12:31 PM
Post subject:
I'll be responsible for getting the results reported to the NAF site.

Could one of you all work your magic and make sure the Chaos Cup is an approved tournament?

Galak
AnthonyTBBF - Sep 29, 2004 - 07:50 AM
Post subject:
Approved!
ggiersch - Oct 02, 2004 - 09:44 AM
Post subject:
Well I'll be doing everything in my power to be there. I'll see if I can bring a nice representation from Wisconsin. Looking forward to meeting many of you for the first time!

Gregg
Melifaxis - Oct 05, 2004 - 02:01 PM
Post subject:
Since my Death Bowl plans got squashed I may try and fly out for this. It would really suck to fly there and not be able to play though...
crazylegs - Oct 07, 2004 - 08:53 PM
Post subject:
I'll be there, seeing as how I'm a whopping 15 minutes away...
GalakStarscraper - Oct 08, 2004 - 08:02 AM
Post subject:
      Melifaxis wrote:
Since my Death Bowl plans got squashed I may try and fly out for this. It would really suck to fly there and not be able to play though...
Uh ... I don't think you'll have any worry of that Mel.

Last year they had half the # of GenCon and that was with a 2 day tournament, advertising, AND JJ coming.

This year its one day, NO advertising, and no guests ... so I doubt the seats are going to be packed such that you could not play.

Galak
GalakStarscraper - Oct 11, 2004 - 06:06 PM
Post subject:
Oh man ... I just found where they buried the information on the "official" web site for the Chaos Cup.

Try this guys:

1) Go to http://www.adeptuswindycity.com
2) Click on Downloads
3) Click on Tournament Resource
4) The first listing is the rules for the Chaos Cup

Or if you want to avoid all that:
http://www.adeptuswindycity.com/files/2004ChaosCupRules.pdf

It has one typo that we've found as the Necro team has be left off but it is an official and allowed team for the tournament.

Hotels:

Holiday Inn Express
3031 Finley Rd.
Downers Grove, IL 60515
630-810-9500
www.hiexpress.com/chi-downers
$72 a night for a room with two beds

or

Red Roof
1113 Butterfield Road
Downers Grove, IL 60515
(630) 963-4205
www.redroof.com
$47 a night for a room with two beds

The Holiday Inn is across the street from the bunker, the Red Roof is 1.8 miles down the same road.

========================================

But if that isn't the most buried listing I've ever seen. I thought something on the main page would announce it ... but no luck ... oh well.

My Flings might actually bring home a major trophy ... Very Happy

Galak
dwarfcoach - Oct 11, 2004 - 07:02 PM
Post subject:
      GalakStarscraper wrote:


But if that isn't the most buried listing I've ever seen. I thought something on the main page would announce it ... but no luck ... oh well.

My Flings might actually bring home a major trophy ... Very Happy

Galak



Hehe, you mean an international tourney I have a chance of winning? This sounds better and better.... Wink
Xtreme - Oct 12, 2004 - 12:20 AM
Post subject:
Fewer teams that show up means I have a better and better chance at best painted, woohoo.
Jonny_P - Oct 14, 2004 - 10:44 AM
Post subject:
I don't think there will be many people. GW doesnt really advertise BB too well although we got a small mention in the new WD.

I will be there with my DARKSIDE COWBOYS!
Hoshi_Komi - Oct 26, 2004 - 12:35 PM
Post subject:
Anybody need a roommate?

Ken
Hoshi_Komi - Nov 01, 2004 - 05:21 PM
Post subject:
well i'm staying at the redroof inn
GalakStarscraper - Nov 01, 2004 - 07:36 PM
Post subject:
      gken1 wrote:
well i'm staying at the redroof inn
Xtreme, Frank, and I are carpooling up together ... we'll be there late on Friday night ... probably too late for this old man to get a game in as I'm expecting it will will be around midnight.

Galak
Jonny_P - Nov 03, 2004 - 01:31 PM
Post subject:
I hope the turnout is good. At least 20 teams I'm hoping. As a note, the battle bunker doesn't have any chairs/stools that I have seen. Maybe they have some in the back, but I may bring a stool just in case. 4 games is a long time to be standing the whole time.

I look forward to meeting you all. I don't really post much, but I read the boards here frequently.

Jon
www.thewarrealm.com
GalakStarscraper - Nov 03, 2004 - 04:47 PM
Post subject:
      jpeletis wrote:
I hope the turnout is good. At least 20 teams I'm hoping.
If its 20 ... we really are going to try to get the Chaos Cup moved to GenCon. I'd like to see 30+ teams before I considered it a decent turnout. We'll see. I'd like to see this tournament succeed ... really.

Galak
Xtreme - Nov 03, 2004 - 08:51 PM
Post subject:
No chairs, no coins, how about doughnuts? Smile
GalakStarscraper - Nov 03, 2004 - 09:51 PM
Post subject:
      Xtreme wrote:
No chairs, no coins, how about doughnuts? Smile


I got the no coins thing taken care of ... it pays to have some connections ... Wink

Galak
Jonny_P - Nov 04, 2004 - 08:25 AM
Post subject:
      Quote:

If its 20 ... we really are going to try to get the Chaos Cup moved to GenCon. I'd like to see 30+ teams before I considered it a decent turnout. We'll see. I'd like to see this tournament succeed ... really.

Galak


I not as familiar with official tournaments as you guys are, but ever since early this year I have become so disappointed in GW and Blood Bowl.

Out here in the chicago area they decided to do a Super Bowl Blood Bowl tournament. Not sure if you guys heard about this. They were going to have 8 individual tournaments. Each winner of those gets a spot in the final 8 team tournament to occur on super bowl sunday. Whoever won the big tournament on superbowl sunday would get two tickets plus airfare to the next years superbowl, jan 2005.

No publicity for it, just a few flyers at the bunker and other local game stores. Nothing in WD even. The prize was amazing considering you only pay 10 bucks and could get a superbowl trip.

I was busy for the first 2 tournaments but from what I heard only 4 people showed up for the 1st one, and 3 for the second. I went to the 3rd one and also 4 people total. Get this. Besides me, the shop owner was one (he cant win), and another participant was a guy who won the week before just playing for fun. So really it was like 2. I played him and won, and that was my entry. I couldn't believe how ridiculous and awesome this was at the same time. They did a 4th one then. After that, word got out about the poor attendance so they cancelled it. I was really mad. I mean, it's not our fault GW didn't promote it. They would be losing a ton of money because of those tickets, but again since I was already in the winners circle I felt very cheated.

People in charge then said we would have a mini tournament with the 4 winning teams. Each play each other once. Each player automatically got a $100 gw gift cert, and the winner got 400. I lost, same record but the tibreaker was total td's and casualties scored. All in all, not bad, I got a 100 bucks but if we had a good turnout it could have been a chance at superbowl tickets. GW had 20 games and boards ready to go that first night, but with no advertising on a 'specialist' game, what did they expect?

It is because of this, that to me even 12 teams would be a good time.

As far as moving to gencon, selfishly i'd like it to stay in chicago, but I totally understand if you can get the turnout in Indy. My boys would probably make the trip. I haven't been to Gencon since it moved out of milwaukee yet.

Jon
GalakStarscraper - Nov 04, 2004 - 10:01 AM
Post subject:
      jpeletis wrote:
As far as moving to gencon, selfishly i'd like it to stay in chicago, but I totally understand if you can get the turnout in Indy. My boys would probably make the trip. I haven't been to Gencon since it moved out of milwaukee yet.

Jon
I'd like to keep in Chicago also ... but I want it run well and to get attendance worth enough to call it a Major. GenCon has had 60 and 44 coaches for our two tournaments and its not that far from Chicago (extra 3 hours).

We'll see ... with this type of support ... we could run a really good tournament for the Chaos Cup at GenCon and have a lot of support. ANYWAY ... I'm ready to have fun with whoever shows up ... my team is ready ... painted and based to full painting points and I'm ready to play some BB.



Galak
Jonny_P - Nov 04, 2004 - 11:23 AM
Post subject:
Very cool! I love the old school treeman. Halflings are great fun to play.

Here is my Darkside Cowboys and my brother's Warped Vengeance. We will both be there saturday with these teams...



Jon
www.thewarrealm.com
GalakStarscraper - Nov 04, 2004 - 01:44 PM
Post subject:
      jpeletis wrote:
Very cool! I love the old school treeman. Halflings are great fun to play.
Yeah it a lot of fun being one of the only coaches in the world who brings Halflings to a tournament and expects to win.

Galak
Melifaxis - Nov 05, 2004 - 12:31 PM
Post subject:
Have fun gents Very Happy
majortusk - Nov 05, 2004 - 12:38 PM
Post subject:
      GalakStarscraper wrote:
      jpeletis wrote:
Very cool! I love the old school treeman. Halflings are great fun to play.
Yeah it a lot of fun being one of the only coaches in the world who brings Halflings to a tournament and expects to win.

Galak


you obviously havent been playing against Gregg Giersch

he should be at CC also
GalakStarscraper - Nov 05, 2004 - 12:54 PM
Post subject:
      majortusk wrote:
you obviously havent been playing against Gregg Giersch

he should be at CC also
Greg would be one of the other few.

I look forward to meeting as many of the WI folks as possible, you, Gregg, Brian (carnage4u), and absent as well.

Galak
Jonny_P - Nov 05, 2004 - 04:10 PM
Post subject:
I enjoyed playing the Madison crew at the tournament in Aurora IL over here. The Skaven player had an awesome paintjob!
ggiersch - Nov 07, 2004 - 05:14 AM
Post subject: And the Winner Is...
Well, I was able to attend - but not able to play... Aarrrghh!!! My wife was on call as a nurse, and for the first time this year - she was called in. Did everything I could to get some babysitters, and at least I was able to get grandma to help out for a few hours just so I could drop in and visit the tournament. It only made me more upset to find out that the Halflings might have dominated the tournament. If I would have played, there would have been 3 Halfling coaches that I know of for sure. I'm dying to know who won! Also, how did my fellow Halfling coaches fare? The man to beat would have been Andy Welton's Khemri. He was having an exellent game when I visited.

Lookin' forward to hearing the results,

Gregg
Old_Man_Monkey - Nov 07, 2004 - 06:35 AM
Post subject:
How many coaches were there, Gregg?
Grumbledook - Nov 07, 2004 - 06:50 AM
Post subject:
so did i win?
Hoshi_Komi - Nov 07, 2004 - 09:45 AM
Post subject:
well i won the overall Champion but DEAN deserves the CHAOS CUP!

I really don't care and wouldn't mind just being the Overall winner (Bunker Player....same thing Grum won at Spike!) with Dean being called the Chaos cup Champ.

Dean played a really good game even with minimal players.
First half I smashed him and scored on turn 8.
2nd half he made 3 4+ dodges, 3+ dodge and 2+dodge then a long pass for td on turn two.
Then I caged up, killed a gutter runer on a foul but got caught on a 1 in 6. He dodges with storm vermin and gets one die block on ball carrier. knocks him down. gutter runner then makes 3 3+dodges picks up the ball 3+ and dodges out 2+ then 2 GFI's. I knock gutter runner down next turn. Gutter runner gets up dodges 4+, picks up ball 4+ then fails 3+ dodge. ball lands in endzone. I decide to take my best block on the field before fouling the gutter runner to eliminate only scoring threat. double skulls with my blitz-ra. Gutter runner gets up and wins the game.

Great Game Dean.
Zombie - Nov 07, 2004 - 09:55 AM
Post subject:
So, how many tournaments is that you've won with Khemri now, three?
Jonny_P - Nov 07, 2004 - 10:05 AM
Post subject:
It was a great time. So many Khemri and Skaven teams. Xavier had his Wood Elves and I had my Dark Elves and that was it for Elf teams. I tied against a halfling team. The master chef and his 3 sets of special ingredients made sure I had no rerolls for either half and made sure he had about 6-7 each half. It was cool to meet everybody.
GalakStarscraper - Nov 07, 2004 - 11:23 AM
Post subject:
And with this in mind Ken ... since GenCon is going to 5 games next year.

I'll get rid of 3rd place. Have the top two coaches after 4 games play for 1st and 2nd. And have the overall point winner from the other coaches take a All-Around award.

I'll also move the CAS bonus points to

+10 for 2 more than opponent
+5 of 1 more than opponent

Made a lot of sense after talking to the basher coaches.

Galak
Zombie - Nov 07, 2004 - 11:45 AM
Post subject:
I don't like that system at all. In fact, i hate it. The 4th place guy (and maybe even the 5h and 6th place coaches as well) will probably have more points at the end of the tourney then the runner up. It makes no sense to me to give the runner up a prize and not give one to those. If you're gonna use the swiss system, use it all the way. The swiss system isn't meant to have a top table at the end decide between no. 1 and no. 2. It's meant to figure out who did best at the end of the day, giving all rounds the same weight.

Even the number 1 guy at the end of the day isn't necessarily the one who won on table 1 last round. It could be the one who lost (as happened to gken). It could even be someone who wasn't on table one at all. For example, the two guys on table one get a tie and both get passed by the winner on table 2. Or the no. 2 on table 1 gets a tight win and the winner on table 2 gets more bonus points. Or the 2nd coach on table 1 has fewer points before the last round than the 1st coach on table 2, but gets to table one regarless because the other coach has already played the no. 1.

What matters in the end is who got most total points, not who got to table 1 and won, or who got to table 1 and lost.
GalakStarscraper - Nov 07, 2004 - 12:05 PM
Post subject:
Zombie to be honest I'm torn because I agree with you (at least I think I do) .... its an overall system the person where the best overall coach wins the tournament and I like that system.

But then you get guys like GKen who clearly won the Chaos Cup overall on total points as the system worked and comes on and says he shouldn't have won because one guy went 4-0 and he went 3-1. I say the point system is solid. Dean won 45 more points than Ken for that 4th game (win was 55 points / loss 10 points). Ken across his 4 games had 35 more bonus points from CAS and TDs than Dean and outscored Dean by 12 points on sportsmanship with a score 44 to Dean's 32.

So to be honest I'm with you Zombie ... in a 4 game tournament the only fair system for overall best coach is the one the Chaos Cup used (or a variation of it).

One of those things for me to think about. I'll probably go back to my eariler thoughts that I give 1st, 2nd, and 3rd ... and for the player with the most game points I gave an extra prize that doesn't receive a trophy. So that it is recognized.

Galak
Zombie - Nov 07, 2004 - 12:45 PM
Post subject:
I thought this was a case of both guys getting one loss, but Ken getting his on the last round. You say Ken lost one more game?

This sounds to me like another case of bonus points being worth too much and actually winning games not being worth enough. Fix that and the guy with the best record should win the tournament.
Jonny_P - Nov 07, 2004 - 12:53 PM
Post subject:
Personally I feel that record should always be used to determine victor, and only in the case of ties you can then look to sportsmanship, td, casualty, and painting points. This one was real close and I believe it was only 6 points difference. Sportsmanship points are very hard to use because they can be unintentionally biased.
Hoshi_Komi - Nov 07, 2004 - 02:22 PM
Post subject:
I agree with the records and thats why I said your brother deserves the Cup. As for Sportsmanship points, these are the best sportsmanship rules I've seen in a tournament....ie just ranking your games 1-4. I gave your brother the #2 slot for sportsmanship...so he didn't lose pts because of me Smile I just found it odd that I ended up with so many sportsmanship pts..(tied for first (45 out of 52)) ..that's what threw the whole formula off.
Darkson - Nov 07, 2004 - 04:21 PM
Post subject:
Personally (and this is from someone who isn't ever going to bother the Tourney winners list), I feel if you know what the scoring system is in advance, you've no call to complain about it afterwards (and I'm not pointing a finger at anyone, especially Ken, who's "alright2 Wink ).

Sure, suggest ways to improve it, but saying "that sucks" post-tourney sounds like sour grapes imo (and I realise Zombie didn't compete).
Darkson - Nov 07, 2004 - 04:22 PM
Post subject:
And I think the servers time has gone screwy again, as the 2 posts below mine were posted before mine (11.22PM GMT).
GalakStarscraper - Nov 07, 2004 - 06:00 PM
Post subject:
Actually they are not.

The bonus points are actually less than was used last year for tournaments like Underworld (including this year's Underworld), Origins, and the GenCon Bowl.

A win was 55 points
A tie was 35 points
A loss was 10 points

Winning by 2+ TDs was a 10 point bonus
Having more CAS was a 10 point bonus
Having the same number of CAS was a 5 point bonus

Sportsmanship had a max of 52 and a minimum of 12.
Painting was max of 15 and minimum of 0.

So the math becomes:
Points up for grabs from games: 180
Points up for grabs from bonus: 80
Points up for grabs from sportsmanship: 40
Points up for grabs from painting: 15

The breakdown of Gken and Dean:

Gken
Games: 175
Bonus: 55
Sports: 45
Painting: 15
Tota:

Dean
Games: 220
Bonus: 20
Sports: 32
Painting: 12

=========================================

So we can go 'round and 'round on this ... and I realize that Dean is not contesting the outcome, but that's a pretty solid method of scoring a 4 game tournament. A tie is always worth more than a loss and a win is always worth more than a tie.

Ken was 45 points behind based on games played ... that's a lot of ground to have to cover with bonus points and he had scored a great deal of them but it really came down to sportsmanship ... and that's something folks will never agree on. You are either of the camp that its as important as winning or that its not important at all for determining who wins. I fall in the camp of as important as winning. I fully understand that some folks will not agree at all that sportsmanship should matter.

Galak
Zombie - Nov 07, 2004 - 06:36 PM
Post subject:
Galak, even if it's less than before, that's still too many bonus points, as can clearly be seen by the final result. I agree with jpeletis, in that people should only be ranked by their records, with TDs, CAS and sportsmanship used only as tie breakers.
Zombie - Nov 07, 2004 - 08:17 PM
Post subject:
And you're right Darkson, the server did have a weird glitch. The two posts marked 10:58 pm and 10:59 pm below (Eastern time) were indeed posted before yours, Galak's and mine.
Jonny_P - Nov 07, 2004 - 08:58 PM
Post subject:
No, it's totally cool Ken, in fact, later on Dean told me he felt bad because people were talking about him being 4-0 and he didn't want people to think he was complaining, because he wasn't. It was just soemthing some people noticed and started talking on their own about it. Not sure, but I think he ranked you 1 or 2 in sportsmanship as well. I know he just signed up to NAF so he should be posting soon. Great time though and I hope to make it to the next NAF event.

Jon
Grumbledook - Nov 07, 2004 - 08:59 PM
Post subject:
if the wins were given more worth it wouldn't have happened

the extra points should be used to tie those off on the same points

i was talking with some guys at the spiky club about this and woody suggested then that adding 5 points more on the win draw and lost would give more emphasis on the record than the extra stuff

this is the first tournament though that this has happened guess the bonus points were a larger preportion of the game points, which was skewed even more with their only being 4 games
avatar666 - Nov 07, 2004 - 09:55 PM
Post subject: Chaos Cup (sorry for the long post)
WOW, WHAT A DAY!! I am new to the NAF (this is my first post), but playing at the Chaos Cup yesterday was awesome. Ken, was that a wild and crazy final game, or what?!?!!! UNREAL! Yeah, I did had some pretty good luck during the end of the second half, but I always tried to position my players so that if they did fail, that they or another player could be in some kind of position to try and counter next turn. I don???t think my Skaven has ever been that beat up as quickly and consistently in a game before. Your dirty player did get busted (and you as an arguing coach as well???.), but not until he committed some fouls before hand. I???m just glad his luck ran out when it did. I think the Dwarf Referee finally took his head out of his stein! I had the incredible luck in my first two games of getting two players thrown out for fouling, and I think I only attempted it 3 times in those games.

I am new to tournaments as well (I played in a mini one about a half year ago or so, but it was not half as organized as this one ??? kudos Joe & Tom), so I really do not have that much input on how the system rated compared to others and how (if any) it could be improved. I would agree with some of the past few posts that the ???sportsmanship??? factor could be flawed. No disrespect for the other three coaches and games I played what so ever ??? they all were excellent games and great guys to play against, but I gave Ken the highest rating (worth 13points). I gave this to him, because he was just that ??? a great sportsman. There was a play where I dodged a guy out and then I remembered I was going to blitz with him, but I didn???t declare it. Ken said, ???go ahead a blitz if that is what you were going to do, that???s no big deal???. I thanked him, but I didn???t make it a blitz because I thought about it ??? and was like This is the Chaos Cup Tournament and if I do something as stupid and fundamental as forget to declare a blitz before moving I shouldn???t do it even if my opponent says that I could. That was very admirable of him and totally blew me away. That stuck out in my head when I did the sportsmanship rating. Where I was saying that the ???sportsmanship factor??? could be abused is by a player (such as in the final) could give his opponent the worst rating just to try and give himself the best chance of winning ??? without regard to how great of sportsman the opponent actually was. I do not think anybody playing there Saturday would do that (and I???d like to believe that nobody would do that) ??? but the fact remains that it could be done. Case in point, had I went with this theory, I could have given Ken a 4th place sportsmanship ranking giving him 3 points instead of 13 ??? and vise versa he could have given me the same. That???s just a bug see in that part of this type of tournament. Enough on that subject, I was just throwing in my two cents.

Sorry for the long post (I???m trying to make up for being a new guy on the NAF site).
Once again - Ken, Ethan, Bryan, & Jim: I had a great time playing you guys in the games and hope to have the chance to play you guys again some time in the future. Tom & Joe: Great job of handling the event and I look forward to competing in it again next year. Razz
Xtreme - Nov 08, 2004 - 01:03 AM
Post subject:
It was great getting a chance to play you Dean.
Still can't beleive I got Best Painted, there were some really nice teams there that I think were better then mine.
majortusk - Nov 08, 2004 - 01:22 AM
Post subject:
Best way to solve that problem with overall winners, is to make a seperate award.

Overall Tournament winner and Best Coach. Tournament winner only takes in account of just the game stats, Best Coach takes care of all the stats combined.

Seen that be used in many Tourneys over here.
dwarfcoach - Nov 08, 2004 - 04:32 AM
Post subject:
      majortusk wrote:
Best way to solve that problem with overall winners, is to make a seperate award.

Overall Tournament winner and Best Coach. Tournament winner only takes in account of just the game stats, Best Coach takes care of all the stats combined.


Yep, 100% in agreement! Exclamation That means that you have a 'knock-out competition style' champion and an 'overall most tourney points style' champion. Both players get acknowledged and it's up to the individual to decide which champion they think is more worthy.
I personally would judge them on an equal level and give the same prize/amount of kudos to both...
Old_Man_Monkey - Nov 08, 2004 - 05:41 AM
Post subject:
Is no one going to post the number of coaches that attended? Evil or Very Mad
GalakStarscraper - Nov 08, 2004 - 05:44 AM
Post subject:
      Zombie wrote:
Galak, even if it's less than before, that's still too many bonus points, as can clearly be seen by the final result. I agree with jpeletis, in that people should only be ranked by their records, with TDs, CAS and sportsmanship used only as tie breakers.


Been there, tried that .... had 6 coaches drop out of the tournament after the 1st round because they lost their first game which made it mathematically impossible for them to compete for gold ring.

So I'll just say I agree and disagree with your opinion Zombie. In a perfect world yeah ... its a great idea. But BB coaches are not perfect people so the point system has to make it very difficult to catch up for a loss but possible. Just my personal belief on the matter. Otherwise, the non-die hards find better things to do with the rest of their day.

As for sportsmanship ... yeah Dean ... I see how you suggest that could happen. But to be honest the type of coach that would be willing to do that probably won't be getting many sportsmanship points from his other 3 games as that type of attitude tends to bleed through your playing style.

That said ... it was a good time ... it ran a lot better than I hoped. I'm going to take some thoughts from Ken on the bonus points for CAS and I'll kick around in my head Dean's thoughts on sportsmanship.

Galak
Melifaxis - Nov 08, 2004 - 06:00 AM
Post subject:
      Old_Man_Monkey wrote:
Is no one going to post the number of coaches that attended? Evil or Very Mad


22 according to Galak over on TBB Very Happy
Old_Man_Monkey - Nov 08, 2004 - 06:18 AM
Post subject:
Thank, Rob! Just saw where Tom had posted it... such an in-between number - I had thought 30+ would mean relative success, below 20 demonstration of failure... still, when I see 40 or so in Canada - with the effort that was made to entertain and enjoy - it's clear that someone in the US has some work to do...
avatar666 - Nov 08, 2004 - 08:16 AM
Post subject:
Xtreme,
Yeah that was a great game. It's always very "interesting" setting up against a Big guy team when my guys only have strength 2 and strength 3. That's why they can run like hell!
At the end of the second half I don't think I ever seen anyone roll that many "Bonehead" rolls! Neutral


avatar666 - Nov 08, 2004 - 09:08 AM
Post subject:
      Quote:
As for sportsmanship ... yeah Dean ... I see how you suggest that could happen. But to be honest the type of coach that would be willing to do that probably won't be getting many sportsmanship points from his other 3 games as that type of attitude tends to bleed through your playing style.


I agree with you Tom. But the problem I see is it is a vote you cast insecrecy at the end of the tourney. Plus the fact that you have to give somebody that dreaded 4th slot of 3 points. It was a very difficult to decide some of the ranking as all of the coaches I played could have a 1st place rating if it was possible, and I would like to think that I was as good as sport in their eyes as well. In theory, someone could end up with 12 points (4 games of 4th sportsmanship), just because every coach had to chose one.

Like I said, I am new to tourneys, so I don;t fully understand all of the reasoning., but I think that your "Red" and "Yellow" demerits would be enough to take away the threat of a poor sport going anywhere point wise.

      Quote:
That said ... it was a good time ... it ran a lot better than I hoped.


I agree 100% - and I think everyone who attended would agree!
Hoshi_Komi - Nov 08, 2004 - 10:11 AM
Post subject:
i'm in the group of overall winner and tourney champion (winner of championship game) --but usually they are the same person so the overall winner would go to 2nd best.

As for sportsmanship, I think this is the best method I've seen just because it actually forces you to differentiate between your opponents. Other tourneys basically I've seen have you give everybody a rating....some people just give max points to everyone while others differentiate. Which leads to skewed results. I think with this system you'll actually get a "best sportsman" because the variance of pts.
GalakStarscraper - Nov 08, 2004 - 12:35 PM
Post subject:
This could change ... but here I think are my thoughts for GenCon then next year that used the same system as the Chaos Cup.

1) 5 games

2) Top two teams using game+bonus points after 4 games play in the final in game 5. They are 1st and 2nd. Drop the prize for 3rd place.

3) All-around coach award will be award to the coach from the remaining players with the most overall tournament points (including sportsmanship and painting).

4) CAS bonus points will move to 10 points for 2 more than opponent, 5 points for 1 more, 0 points for tie.

5) Sportsmanship will be revised to this if GenCon was still 4 games like the Chaos Cup was:
1st: 17 points
2nd: 13 points
3rd: 9 points
4th: 5 points
Your highest and lowest rankings will be halved and rounded up for total sportsmanship.
So the current system without this change would have a maximum of 52 and a minimum of 12 for 4 games. This would have a maximum of 52 and a minimum 16 for 4 games.

This is removes some error if a coach gets nailed hard by one weird result. A coach in the old method with 3 1sts and a 4th would get 42 points. With this sytem he would get 46 points. Without ignoring results you cannot totally fix this possible issue that Dean mentioned ... but this reduces its effect quite a bit ... costing that coach no more than 6 points as compared to 10 in the old system.

=========================================

Not locked in stone ... but this is what I'm taking away from this tournament at this moment for possible changes.

Galak
Hoshi_Komi - Nov 08, 2004 - 12:44 PM
Post subject:
that looks solid to me tom.
jaylazer - Nov 08, 2004 - 12:57 PM
Post subject:
      GalakStarscraper wrote:
5) Sportsmanship will be revised to this if GenCon was still 4 games like the Chaos Cup was:
1st: 17 points
2nd: 13 points
3rd: 9 points
4th: 5 points
Your highest and lowest rankings will be halved and rounded up for total sportsmanship.
So the current system without this change would have a maximum of 52 and a minimum of 12 for 4 games. This would have a maximum of 52 and a minimum 16 for 4 games.

This is removes some error if a coach gets nailed hard by one weird result. A coach in the old method with 3 1sts and a 4th would get 42 points. With this sytem he would get 46 points. Without ignoring results you cannot totally fix this possible issue that Dean mentioned ... but this reduces its effect quite a bit ... costing that coach no more than 6 points as compared to 10 in the old system.


Galak, I'm a little confused about this. You've mixed tense a couple of times and some of the math doesn't seem to add up.

Could you post exactly what you are thinking of for next years Gen Con?

If you put that in it might clear it up.

Also, I'm not sure I follow your math. 3 firsts and a 4th add up to 56 (17*3 +5) you said 42?

Did I miss something? Confused
Hoshi_Komi - Nov 08, 2004 - 01:07 PM
Post subject:
I think Chaos cup was 13, 10, 6, 3
jaylazer - Nov 08, 2004 - 01:13 PM
Post subject:
      gken1 wrote:
I think Chaos cup was 13, 10, 6, 3


OK. Now I get 42. Thanks Ken Smile
Hoshi_Komi - Nov 08, 2004 - 01:39 PM
Post subject:
Chaos Cup FLUFF:

Warped Vengence 2 vs Desert Kings 1

The Warped Vengence raised the Chaos Cup in the air declaring victory, but when they go to receive their winnings the Chaos gods frowned on their Casualty output and they only walk away with the Cup. The Desert Kings receive all the $$$$$$$$$$$$ from the Crystal Ball Service (CBS) and the gate.

Warped Vengence----Chaos Cup Champs!!!!!!!!!
avatar666 - Nov 08, 2004 - 02:44 PM
Post subject:
... and the DESERT KINGS the undisputed Overall Champions!

Ken, you rule, man. We'll meet up again on the pitch some day!


Old_Man_Monkey - Nov 08, 2004 - 02:58 PM
Post subject:
Great display of sportsmanship you two! It's great to see and I'm glad to have such great players in the US...

And Ken - we gotta do some shopping for you, my friend! All your champions pictures are in the same shirt... or, maybe that's your LUCKY shirt... Very Happy Wink
Melifaxis - Nov 08, 2004 - 03:14 PM
Post subject:
Maybe we should place a bounty on the shirt Wink

Next one to bunk with Ken swipes it and puts it through a shredder... Razz
Doubleskulls - Nov 08, 2004 - 03:56 PM
Post subject:
      majortusk wrote:
Best way to solve that problem with overall winners, is to make a seperate award.

Overall Tournament winner and Best Coach. Tournament winner only takes in account of just the game stats, Best Coach takes care of all the stats combined.

Seen that be used in many Tourneys over here.


IMO this is a really tricky question and both approaches are valid.

By including Sports/Painting etc in the overall rankings Galak and other organisers are emphasising the combined nature of the event. If you separate sports/painting into their own prizes where they don't count then you are making these important parts of the hobby less significant - and crucical allowing b*st*rds with unpainted teams compete.
GalakStarscraper - Nov 08, 2004 - 04:47 PM
Post subject:
      Doubleskulls wrote:
and crucical allowing b*st*rds with unpainted teams compete.
and to be honest ... this was the part of the system that has always made me cringe. Because I know the point system I'm using was designed to specifically not allow these folks to win or at least make it more difficult.

Galak
Hoshi_Komi - Nov 08, 2004 - 04:54 PM
Post subject:
      GalakStarscraper wrote:
      Doubleskulls wrote:
and crucical allowing b*st*rds with unpainted teams compete.
and to be honest ... this was the part of the system that has always made me cringe. Because I know the point system I'm using was designed to specifically not allow these folks to win or at least make it more difficult.

Galak


Worship never thought of it from that point of view....hmm. to show up to a tourney without a painted team just seems unthinkable to me I guess.
Hoshi_Komi - Nov 08, 2004 - 04:56 PM
Post subject:
      Old_Man_Monkey wrote:
Great display of sportsmanship you two! It's great to see and I'm glad to have such great players in the US...

And Ken - we gotta do some shopping for you, my friend! All your champions pictures are in the same shirt... or, maybe that's your LUCKY shirt... Very Happy Wink


lol....it's my hawaiian shirt. don't hate the shirt.....hate the player...or is it don't hate the player, hate the game? Mr. Green I guess it might be a little lucky Smile
absent - Nov 08, 2004 - 07:09 PM
Post subject:
on the issue of sportsmanship, I really disliked having to judge people 1234 like that as I had 4 great games, one with the person I rode with (wonder who I put as number 1), a new guy, and a pair of good skaven coaches who gave me tough games. I didn't like the idea of putting the new guy down as number 4 because he is just getting into the game, he was a nice opponent, but the game wasn't as good as the other 3, but i don't want to discourge him from future games.
I understand not letting people score everyone; you feel like you have to give everyone the max points then.
I think the scale should be a little more even, or you should get like 40 points, distribute how you like between 5-15 points per opponent, or something, so you don't have to shaft someone.
majortusk - Nov 08, 2004 - 08:41 PM
Post subject:
I like how RTT scoring is for these.

Every Game you vote on it.

1 Best Opponent ever
2 Solid enjoyable game
3 Rule Dogding, not a fun game.
4 Want to ambust the %&@%#&% in the parking lot
absent - Nov 08, 2004 - 08:50 PM
Post subject:
Like I said though then you feel like you have to give the person you play a 4 every round, maybe it's different in BB than it is in other games though.
Zombie - Nov 08, 2004 - 09:49 PM
Post subject:
      GalakStarscraper wrote:
Been there, tried that .... had 6 coaches drop out of the tournament after the 1st round because they lost their first game which made it mathematically impossible for them to compete for gold ring.


That's got to do with the fact that you're talking GenCon, with lots of people (about 50) and not enough games played (only 4) to find a winner. In a standard North American tournaments with 20 people and 6 rounds, you could win the whole thing even with 2 losses.

      GalakStarscraper wrote:
So I'll just say I agree and disagree with your opinion Zombie. In a perfect world yeah ... its a great idea. But BB coaches are not perfect people so the point system has to make it very difficult to catch up for a loss but possible. Just my personal belief on the matter. Otherwise, the non-die hards find better things to do with the rest of their day.


Again, that's only GenCon. In a normal tournament, win or lose, there is nothing better to do with the rest of your day.
Jonny_P - Nov 08, 2004 - 10:09 PM
Post subject:
Anyone who doesn't stay until then end, unless they have some type of emergency should be banned from the next NAF event. That is just wrong. Not only does it screw up the next rounds games but it really brings down morale and shows that some people really don't play games to have fun.
Doubleskulls - Nov 08, 2004 - 10:49 PM
Post subject:
      absent wrote:
I didn't like the idea of putting the new guy down as number 4 because he is just getting into the game, he was a nice opponent, but the game wasn't as good as the other 3, but i don't want to discourge him from future games.


IMO this is a huge problem. Coaches award sportsmanship based on the game - not their opponent's behaviour.

Also I don't like the RTT system - their are too few bands to really allow much differentiation and my own preference is for a simple maybe a 1-7 score (4 a "normal opponent", 7 and you want them to marry your sister) but only very low scores actually effect the overall tournament score (so you penalise bad sports). Then you have a separate prize for best sportsman too to reward the best sports out there.
absent - Nov 08, 2004 - 11:14 PM
Post subject:
The better the game, the more fun it is, I assumed thats I should vote for who I had the most fun against. If I have to hold my opponents hand and point out 2 die blocks for him every turn to get through the turn... eh...I don't mind teaching someone to play, but not at a timed tournament.
GalakStarscraper - Nov 09, 2004 - 06:48 AM
Post subject:
      absent wrote:
I didn't like the idea of putting the new guy down as number 4 because he is just getting into the game.
Gave my first place marks to an opponent who was only playing his 2nd game of BB in his life. He needed help, but he was a great sport and the game was fun. So the newbie isn't always going to get nailed.

Like I said ... a small modification to the system so that your highest and lowest score are halved will help take care of any problem with that.

Galak
AnthonyTBBF - Nov 09, 2004 - 09:04 AM
Post subject:
      Old_Man_Monkey wrote:
Thank, Rob! Just saw where Tom had posted it... such an in-between number - I had thought 30+ would mean relative success, below 20 demonstration of failure... still, when I see 40 or so in Canada - with the effort that was made to entertain and enjoy - it's clear that someone in the US has some work to do...


Yikes, this doesn't look good... why do you guys suppose there was such a (relatively) low turnout?
Darkson - Nov 09, 2004 - 11:42 AM
Post subject:
Have to agree with absent here, I reall dislike that type of "sportsman" scoring. I'd be more likely to "forget" to mark anyone (possibly screwing 4 people) that have to choose. In the 5 turneys I've attended, there's been 1 I'd rather not play again, 1 I'd play again but don't care if I don't, and the rest of them I'd happily play again anyday, and I'd find it almost impossible to choose between them. Hell, Siky this year I play 6 people and can't chose between them. I perfer absents idea of a pool of poits for you to divide, then these fixed values.
Grumbledook - Nov 09, 2004 - 12:01 PM
Post subject:
      Darkson wrote:
1 I'd rather not play again


i hope that wasn't me ;]
angryrob - Nov 09, 2004 - 12:09 PM
Post subject:
Galak[/quote]
      Quote:

absent wrote:
I didn't like the idea of putting the new guy down as number 4 because he is just getting into the game

do you guys even know what sportsmanship means?
      Quote:

I don't mind teaching someone to play, but not at a timed tournament

isn't this game supposed to be fun
absent - Nov 09, 2004 - 01:33 PM
Post subject:
      angryrob wrote:

isn't this game supposed to be fun


sure is, thats why I love leagues, and the whole game, thats why I had fun in my 4 close games at the CC(even against the new guy was close as my blitzer hurt himself on his thrower) I didn't say I didn't have fun, I said I had the least fun vs. him because I had to sit and teach him while my lunch hour was going by, and the game was the least competative. What does sportsmanship mean?, to me it means how fun the person was to play against. I would rather have given him 3rd, I kinda had a tie for first and a tie for third for sportsmanship in my eyes, not a first and a last. After I posted that I knew I was too tired, it kinda came across rude, but O well, I had a great time at the tournament and putting someone as last in sportsmanship was the only bad part of the whole thing.
GalakStarscraper - Nov 09, 2004 - 02:05 PM
Post subject:
      AnthonyTBBF wrote:
Yikes, this doesn't look good... why do you guys suppose there was such a (relatively) low turnout?


1) One day tournament. We could debate this for a year but I think the one day format counted for a good piece of the drop from 43 to 22 coaches. You are not going to get folks from out of town (other than Xavier and Ken) to come to a one day event.

2) Buried info. The rules for the tournament were buried on a non GW site so deep that most of the coaches were unable to find the rules.

3) Little to no advertising. I'm told there was a ad in White Dwarf, but other than that and some flyers at GenCon ... advertising was almost nil.

4) Appearance of lack of support. The one day format mixed with how the tournament was organized last year gave the impression to many that it was not going to be run well. That turned out not to be true, but only because NAF folks like Gregg and I (and I think Andy as well) stepped in and gave GW a hand.

===========================================

Solutions as I see them

1) We have to convince Joe to try a 2 day tournament again. I consider most of the 21 folks that didn't show up to be voting for 2 days. If a 2 day event doesn't generate interest next year ... I'd back down ... but I think its important to pull in the out of towners.

2) GW or NAF or I reserve a domain and use it to post results, rules, and information on the tournament. I'll more than happy post a link straight to it off my main page of bloodbowl.net which will help inform everyone. In addition, this site could list nearby inexpensive hotels to help folks see that its not that expensive to stay overnight.

3) GW needs to make sure that Fanatic Mag (even if its online) has a full page/half page ad to announce the event. It needs an ad in White Dwarf to run, and its needs to make sure there is an online presense to advertise the tournament.

4) If the NAF has all 4 (5 if you add on in OZ) majors be the same for K value, this will help give the world legit reasons to take the effort to attend the majors. There are several NAF members that are willing get the Chaos Cup a breathing functional tournament. But the NAF lending it some street cred would sure as heck help. Right now if I've got to choose between GenCon and the Chaos Cup ... its a slam dunk if I'm buying a plane ticket because the GenCon tournament will be more games, more folks, and count more for my NAF ranking. I'm willing to work with Joe on more games, but I need the NAF to equal up the majors to give the Cup some more reasons for folks to come. If we can get folks through the doors, we can make it a good tournament.

5) Joe is working on starting a Battle Bunker Blood Bowl league ... if that takes hold that will be an excellent source for players and word of mouth to build on for that tournament.

Galak
absent - Nov 09, 2004 - 02:51 PM
Post subject:
Everyone is jumping around like this was some disastorous failure, I, For One, thought the tournament was great, and I didn't hear ONE PERSON complain during the tournament about it.

I'd like to mention there were only 20 boards available from the tourney host, thats a 40person max, I don't see how 22 people was that bad for a 40 person max.

Always amazing how things get blown out of proportion online.... I guess thats what I'm here for though, thats ussually my job!
Hoshi_Komi - Nov 09, 2004 - 03:00 PM
Post subject:
i'm just glad to have met more people.....that's always the goal Smile

I got to play Xavier and his pansy elves Smile I think I was the only one to hold him scoreless....but it took double 1's from his catcher to do it Smile

I met Tom-finallly!!!!!--he looked alot taller in pictures Smile , Brian, Dean, Andy (again), Jim the spammer, and got to see the GenCon/Chaos Cup Casualty machine Alex in action Smile 8 Casualties agianst UNDEAD!!! incredible.

But I agree with Tom that next year should be a two day event to see if more people would come.
Doubleskulls - Nov 09, 2004 - 03:07 PM
Post subject:
      absent wrote:
The better the game, the more fun it is, I assumed thats I should vote for who I had the most fun against. If I have to hold my opponents hand and point out 2 die blocks for him every turn to get through the turn... eh...I don't mind teaching someone to play, but not at a timed tournament.


This is a separate issue - and one probably peculiar to the US (where tournies are in conventions rather than specifically set up for the competition). TBH inadequetely prepared coaches I'll generally mark down (i.e. not know basic rules) because I believe when you've paid however much to play each game you want opponent's who are competent.

The problem I'm referring too is where you lose a 6 man pitch invasion in the 1st kick off and lose 4-0. Invariably low sportsmanship points are awarded for such games (by both players) because the game itself wasn't fun. It has no bearing on the sportsmanship of either coach (sometimes coaches in those games are very sporting).
absent - Nov 09, 2004 - 03:26 PM
Post subject:
      gken1 wrote:
Jim the spammer


HEY! I resemble that remark!

if 2 day tourney would double the number of people I'll dish the 25 on a hotel, I'll concede that.
GalakStarscraper - Nov 09, 2004 - 05:04 PM
Post subject:
      absent wrote:
Everyone is jumping around like this was some disastorous failure,!
Its the lens you use to view Jim.

You are looking at it and comparing it to tournaments like the Halfling Dinner Mug, Underworld, or the Golden Skull ... then it was a decent tournament.

When you compare it to the other majors that it was supposed to match up to with 38, 76, and 192 players ... well it wasn't there.

So it was not a disasterous failure as a tournament. It was well run, the prizes were nice, it stay on time for the most part, and folks had a good time. But the desire is to kick it up a notch from being just another US tournament and give it the type of appeal that would make folks want to come you have to do so without a car.

Galak
absent - Nov 09, 2004 - 05:29 PM
Post subject:
We in the US don't have the population density of BB players as they do in europe, hardly our fault. At gen con you get every gamer and their brother, and they draw a bigger crowd yes. I say yes to more advertisment, yes to 2 day tournaments, yes to whatever will make the tournaments larger, but NO to this was some kinda failure. I had a great time, and that is a success to me. If everyone has a great time I think that will help tournament participation, kinda a grassroots type of advertising.
I wouldn't ever spend money on a plane flight for a BB tourney, and I don't blame other people for feeling the same way. BB tournament winnings arn't going to pay for the trip, and It's not like us gamers are rich (not many i've met anyway)
If GW promoted BB at all in the states you might get a pick up in tournaments though, I don't think the issue is how the tournament was advertised or run, or what format it was, but the number of players in a 12 state area from Illinois.
Zombie - Nov 09, 2004 - 05:44 PM
Post subject:
      absent wrote:
We in the US don't have the population density of BB players as they do in europe, hardly our fault.


The US has about 12 times the population density that Canada has, and your major had about half the turnout that ours did. And this despite the fact that the Spike! was only announced about a month in advance.
absent - Nov 09, 2004 - 05:57 PM
Post subject:
on tbb canadia has 21 votes under the population poll, and canadia has a population of 31 million

united states has 96 on pop poll at TBB and a pop of 294 million

we have 5 times the number of players, but 10 times the number of people, therefore you have a higher density of BBers per person, thats what i was getting at... and the spike was in quebec or ontario, right? were the pop density rivals that of the US? where almost all of canadia's residents are?

That was my point was that we don't really have that many BB players in our region.

not trying to be rude, please don't read it as such.
Zombie - Nov 09, 2004 - 06:56 PM
Post subject:
Yes, Ontario and Quebec put together make up for 60% of our population, but they're about half the size of your entire country! For example, the city i'm from is 13 hours away from where the Spike! was held, and that's only if you drive fast like us crazy Quebecers.

It doesn't matter how many Blood Bowl coaches there are per non-Blood Bowl coach. What matters is how many coaches live within a certain distance of the tournament. Toronto is indeed within an area with a high population density (for North America), but so is Chicago. You may be able to use that argument when comparing with European tournaments, but not with Canadian ones.

I agree with Galak, a major should be able to draw more than 22 coaches.
absent - Nov 09, 2004 - 07:30 PM
Post subject:
It does matter how dense a population of BB players you have in a region to see how many people to expect for a tournament in that region though, I disagree with you on that. And the upper midwest doesn't really have that many BBers. It's a moot point anyway, I do agree that everything possible should be done to increase the number of people participating at the tournament, short of moving the tournament to a different region. I think we're just arguing for fun here Smile But I think how this tournament is being judged here is all wrong, It wasn't some disaster, it was FUN, and since it was fun we should work on expanding it for next time.
GalakStarscraper - Nov 09, 2004 - 07:32 PM
Post subject:
      absent wrote:
I say yes to more advertisment, yes to 2 day tournaments, yes to whatever will make the tournaments larger, but NO to this was some kinda failure.
Just so you know absent ... I 100% agree with what you said here. A good tournament that should be have work done to make it bigger ... we are saying the same thing.

Galak
absent - Nov 09, 2004 - 07:46 PM
Post subject:
I wasn't trying to be arguementative, just bored at work, and thought I'd say my bit on how the tournament is being judged. I know i post some stuff that sounds strongly whatever sometimes, not intentional.
Jonny_P - Nov 09, 2004 - 10:21 PM
Post subject:
      Quote:
5) Joe is working on starting a Battle Bunker Blood Bowl league ... if that takes hold that will be an excellent source for players and word of mouth to build on for that tournament.


I am right near the bunker and Dean and I were gathering up names for that bunker league next year. Once up, I'll send the link over becuase if the Chaos Cup remains there, a good core of players from a league already existing there will be a big boost, both in number of players and word of mouth.

Also, this was my first NAF event, but 22 coaches still seems very low for what this tournament is SUPPOSED to be. Like I posted once before, late 2003 GW ran a BB tournament that the final prize was 2 Super Bowl tickets and airfare for the 2005 Super Bowl!!! We had about 8 people show up. They cancelled that prize due to lack of interest and gave each tournament qualifying coach a very nice parting gift. No advertising though. Best prize ever, and no one knew about it.

I play other GW specialist games and it has been my experience that they give you free rulebook downloads to get you into playing, but they don't really push the games. They like to see gaming groups get together and push these games. That's great and all for a little Necromunda campaign, but since they know BB has such a huge (cult) following, they need to advertise this game. Last year's Chaos Cup had a one page ad in a special Chicago Gamesday insert that came with WD subscriptions. This year had nothing on Chicago Gamesday, and just a small blurb about the Chaos Cup.
Old_Man_Monkey - Nov 10, 2004 - 07:21 AM
Post subject:
Well, I had quite a long response last night that was somehow eaten by the site Evil or Very Mad but in a nutshell:

a) no one has suggested that the environment played in this year was 'some kinda failure', rather that the effort put forth by GW-US was not worthy of the national BB tournament for the US and a major championship;

b) as such, it is less a matter of WHERE than ORGANIZATION and SUPPORT - when so many are willing to help improve the tournament. The question is NOT about density - never has been - Chicago was the site because the Midwest Sale Group for GW-US wanted to serve as the host. If density does become the issue, then how about the suggestion that the Chaos Cup move to the Glen Burnie, MD Battle Bunker - the HQ for GW-US - since the density of people/coaches provides a stronger base?

c) the move to GenCon is to ease any transition - Tom already runs a large, well-organized tournament and with some small tweaks, this tournament could serve as the Chaos Cup quite easily. But again, it's less about WHERE and more about ORGANIZATION and SUPPORT;

d) the Chaos Cup is not supposed to be a regional tournament - it should be THE tournament of the year for the country - I understand if some are not willing or able to travel - I do know of DOUBLE the numbers of this year's attendees that did not come to the tourney (both near and far) because it was a one day tournament. '12 states from Illinois' should not be part of the equation;

e) two more points for Tom:
1. it appeared to have no support because it had no support - because your good efforts, along with Gregg's and Andy's and others, kept it from being a disaster does not change this;
2. a change in NAF k value cannot be the issue right now - I am pretty sure the membership would support changes when the level of commitment from GW includes the changes we've talked about. It's putting the cart before the horse - as an officer representing an international membership and as a coach/TO who has attended tournies on both sides, it is premature to make any changes now until we see what GW-US is going to do to improve the tournament. I am working and hoping they allow help from outside their doors to help make this tournament what it should be - one of the preimminent Blood Bowl tournaments in the world and a great time for everyone involved.

-OMM
Old_Man_Monkey - Nov 10, 2004 - 08:18 AM
Post subject:
      absent wrote:
And the upper midwest doesn't really have that many BBers. It's a moot point anyway, I do agree that everything possible should be done to increase the number of people participating at the tournament, short of moving the tournament to a different region. I think we're just arguing for fun here Smile But I think how this tournament is being judged here is all wrong, It wasn't some disaster, it was FUN, and since it was fun we should work on expanding it for next time.


Sorry - usually I just ignore things like this but this project is just too important to stand on the sidelines:

1. If the upper midwest 'doesn't really have that many BBers', then 'expanding it' (and here I take it you mean to move to more games and thus days...) might point out that the tournament should be more central to a majority of coaches who attend;
2. it surely is evident that many don't want the tournament to move because it's convenient to them. Sort of small townish, but OK, what I expect then in turn is for those that want the tourney to remain where it is to appreciate the concerns of those that did not come - for any reason: expense, timeline, organization, et al - and help make sure the needed changes for next year go through.
AnthonyTBBF - Nov 10, 2004 - 08:52 AM
Post subject:
      GalakStarscraper wrote:


Solutions as I see them

1) We have to convince Joe to try a 2 day tournament again. I consider most of the 21 folks that didn't show up to be voting for 2 days. If a 2 day event doesn't generate interest next year ... I'd back down ... but I think its important to pull in the out of towners.

2) GW or NAF or I reserve the domain ChaosCup.com and use it to post results, rules, and information on the tournament. I'll more than happy post a link straight to it off my main page of bloodbowl.net which will help inform everyone. In addition, this site could list nearby inexpensive hotels to help folks see that its not that expensive to stay overnight.

3) GW needs to make sure that Fanatic Mag (even if its online) has a full page/half page ad to announce the event. It needs an ad in White Dwarf to run, and its needs to make sure there is an online presense to advertise the tournament.

4) If the NAF has all 4 (5 if you add on in OZ) majors be the same for K value, this will help give the world legit reasons to take the effort to attend the majors. There are several NAF members that are willing get the Chaos Cup a breathing functional tournament. But the NAF lending it some street cred would sure as heck help. Right now if I've got to choose between GenCon and the Chaos Cup ... its a slam dunk if I'm buying a plane ticket because the GenCon tournament will be more games, more folks, and count more for my NAF ranking. I'm willing to work with Joe on more games, but I need the NAF to equal up the majors to give the Cup some more reasons for folks to come. If we can get folks through the doors, we can make it a good tournament.

5) Joe is working on starting a Battle Bunker Blood Bowl league ... if that takes hold that will be an excellent source for players and word of mouth to build on for that tournament.

Galak


My responses:

1) Tell Joe to contact the Cnadian GW people about the Spike (BTW I am leaving GW in December to start my own thing so I won't be around). The Spike was a two-day event that drew 38 coaches, with 2 from the UK and several from the US. These events can work and we have proof. The Spike didn't cost GW a dime either (we at least broke even on the event).

2) I don't think you need a domain but they do need a dedicated page on the US GW site. We had one for the Spike.

3) I ran a 2 page article on BB the month before the Spike in the Candian WD. Half of one of those pages was an ad for the Spike. I like to do contextual articles like this when events are looming.

4) After the Tourney Director is confirmed I will be looking into getting the NAF more involved in running these majors. I think we need to take the helm becuase IMO they aren't living up to expectations at the moment.

5) League support never hurts...

If you want to get Joe in touch with me I can give him the lowdown on the Spike. I won't be running it next year per se but I still hope to be involved. At least I've set an expectation here in the Canadian business of what a major should be (even though there are even more things we could do).
absent - Nov 10, 2004 - 12:48 PM
Post subject:
I did say I'm for making it 2 days....
Gencon already has a tournament, your suggesting deleting a tournament from already under supported US fans....
If that was the nutshell....that musta been on helluva nut Very Happy

moral- Leave it in chicago, make it two days, do all the advertisment, we'll tell everyone how fun it was and pester them to go next year, you ALL fly in, we have a big ole tourney. fine.
Melifaxis - Nov 10, 2004 - 01:14 PM
Post subject:
Two days versus one is a double edged sword. On one hand you're away from your family (for those of us that it's a factor) longer which is harder for most of us, but at the same time it's hard to justify the expense of a flight for a one-day event.

Maybe the Chaos Cup should be in Vegas. There's cheap flights to Vegas from just about anywhere in the US...of course then you risk losing some folks to the slot machines, etc Wink
Old_Man_Monkey - Nov 10, 2004 - 02:26 PM
Post subject:
All right, brand new dad, point taken - but if it were announced early enough, cheap flights can be had and roomies can be found as you know.

Not true, absent, what I'm saying is that the US Major tournament absolutely should be a two day tournament that is well supported - all of you folks in and around Chicago can, and should, organize a regional tournament - one or two day - if you're up for it.

I think this has probably been hashed to death - one final point for those who may not have seen how other majors or large tournaments are usually organized:

a. on site computer for tournament results and seeding - I understand Joe was running with results to another building!
b. enough staff so that coaches are not having to stop their games and answer rules questions (not that most coaches aren't perfectly willing to help, but it shouldn't be counted upon, especially in a GW environment;
c. activities between games - pub quizzes, drawings, etc -
d. online registration: this is becoming standard in most other parts of the world and the code and how to use it has been around this site for nearly a year;
e. staff familiar with the tournament software - 'nuff said on that...

And I guess it was one helluva nut, absent - thanks for letting me rant a little - having seen how much fun the large tourneys (mostly indie) are, I just want to see that kind of experience available here for US coaches...

      absent wrote:
moral- Leave it in chicago, make it two days, do all the advertisment, we'll tell everyone how fun it was and pester them to go next year, you ALL fly in, we have a big ole tourney. fine.


Perfect - with the added caveat that GW-US improve on their side as well and give Joe some help and support...

-OMM
Melifaxis - Nov 10, 2004 - 02:59 PM
Post subject:
What no comment on the Vegas idea? Wink
Doubleskulls - Nov 10, 2004 - 03:24 PM
Post subject:
      Melifaxis wrote:
What no comment on the Vegas idea? Wink


A Vegas tournament would be a good sell to the Rest of World...
Old_Man_Monkey - Nov 10, 2004 - 03:30 PM
Post subject:
Gonna save that fight only if it's needed.... Very Happy right now, we'll see what we can do with GW-US and Chicago, then if needed to GenCon. I support Galak getting first crack at anyting outside of GW's boundaries because he's earned it... Tom's tournament is great fun and it's still the one place I can count on seeing Darthnoir, Snotsngrots, and my west coast friends...
Grumbledook - Nov 10, 2004 - 03:40 PM
Post subject:
man i'd go to vegas ;]

prolly save up and quit my job and stay till i'm broke heh
TiMuN - Nov 10, 2004 - 05:17 PM
Post subject:
Hey Grum, you are broke already!! Wink
Hoshi_Komi - Nov 10, 2004 - 05:19 PM
Post subject:
nah...he's VODAPHONE RICH BABY!!!!!!!!!!!! those blackberries are worth a pretty penny.....
Doubleskulls - Nov 10, 2004 - 08:14 PM
Post subject:
      Grumbledook wrote:
man i'd go to vegas ;]

prolly save up and quit my job and stay till i'm broke heh


So 15 mins later... Very Happy
Darkson - Nov 11, 2004 - 06:48 AM
Post subject:
      Grumbledook wrote:
      Darkson wrote:
1 I'd rather not play again


i hope that wasn't me ;]


I meant 1 I'd rather not play again because of sportsmanship. My list of players I don't want to face again because of the beatings I'd take is a lot longer! Wink
Darkson - Nov 11, 2004 - 07:02 AM
Post subject:
Going back on thread, although in all honesty, this isn't an option for at least the foreseeable future, atm, if I had the money and time to fly to the US to attend a tourney, I'd be looking at Gencon as the first, Jim's florida tourney or Mel's, much more than the CC. A one-day tourney just isn't going to tempt me across the ocean.

Of course, if I can afford the flight, then the US tourneys are going to have to fight the Canadian tourneys for the pleasure of my presence. Wink
AnthonyTBBF - Nov 11, 2004 - 07:06 AM
Post subject:
Flying for tourneys is fun and all, but running an event isn't a competition. We shouldn't be competing with each other for people. I am a little worried that this sort of talk is going to discourage people from running there own tournaments. I am really glad there are high calibre tournaments out there, but if the NAF isn't getting its members to run smaller regional events then we are failing.
Darkson - Nov 11, 2004 - 07:10 AM
Post subject:
Oh, don't get me wrong. If money was no object, I'd attend all those tourneys I mentioned above. It's just if it's a "one-tourney in my lifetime" thing, do I go to Canada to met the guys there, or the US to meet those guys?

And tbh, I'm really hoping to hold a small tourney sometime next year (because f the fun I had at the 2 Spikys and CamCarn). Just need to sort out which of the 2 groups I game with would be better to hold it with.
Zarhan - Nov 11, 2004 - 07:23 AM
Post subject:
I heard at the Chaos cup, that my MUMMIES were going to get back general access during tournaments, is this just a rumor, or does anyone know for sure.

Secondly, in a five game Gen Con Tournament do you think High Elves will do well.

Bobbo
Hoshi_Komi - Nov 11, 2004 - 07:28 AM
Post subject:
yeah Mummies will keep General Access.....but they really don't need it in tournies....at least I don't take them on my team Smile
Melifaxis - Nov 11, 2004 - 10:29 AM
Post subject:
Thats because you're too busy taking DP, DP, DP, DP on your skeletons Wink
Hoshi_Komi - Nov 11, 2004 - 01:19 PM
Post subject:
yeah, I guess if I didn't take DP on skeletons.....I'd take block or something on mummies Smile
GalakStarscraper - Nov 11, 2004 - 03:18 PM
Post subject:
      AnthonyTBBF wrote:
Flying for tourneys is fun and all, but running an event isn't a competition. We shouldn't be competing with each other for people. I am a little worried that this sort of talk is going to discourage people from running there own tournaments. I am really glad there are high calibre tournaments out there, but if the NAF isn't getting its members to run smaller regional events then we are failing.


Agreed.

However, even though only 6 players showed up last time ... I'm still going to run the Mayhem in April again Anthony. So while I think a major should worry about its attendance ... there are some tournaments I'm willing to run that will not be about attendance.

Galak
GalakStarscraper - Nov 11, 2004 - 03:19 PM
Post subject:
Oh and Joe agreed to move to a 2 day tournament next year and see what happens.

Galak
Spazzfist - Nov 11, 2004 - 04:06 PM
Post subject:
      AnthonyTBBF wrote:
. I am really glad there are high calibre tournaments out there, but if the NAF isn't getting its members to run smaller regional events then we are failing.


Can you please explain what you mean by this?
AnthonyTBBF - Nov 11, 2004 - 08:48 PM
Post subject:
      Spazzfist wrote:
      AnthonyTBBF wrote:
. I am really glad there are high calibre tournaments out there, but if the NAF isn't getting its members to run smaller regional events then we are failing.


Can you please explain what you mean by this?


The NAF is here to support and promote BB tournaments, but they don;t all have to be huge events. A small tourney is as valid as a big one and we need to make sure people understand that. We don't want to scare people off because they don;t think they can live up to the biggies.
Spazzfist - Nov 11, 2004 - 09:08 PM
Post subject:
Well "The Challenge of Q'ermit" took on a life of it's own, but I was thinking of doing a smaller event sometime else in the year - probably the summer. "The Stunty Cup" was an idea that was being bashed around a bit.
AnthonyTBBF - Nov 12, 2004 - 05:06 AM
Post subject:
Doing a big event is OK! I just want everyone to know doing a small one is OK too.
Carnage4u - Nov 15, 2004 - 07:05 AM
Post subject:
Hey, im sure if enough people complain about smaller touraments, then maybe they can just stop having them. THat will sure help the game.
AnthonyTBBF - Nov 15, 2004 - 07:35 AM
Post subject:
Huh?
Spazzfist - Nov 15, 2004 - 08:17 AM
Post subject:
I think he's being sarcastic......

(at least let's hope he is!)
GalakStarscraper - Nov 15, 2004 - 01:36 PM
Post subject:
Brian posts anymore in the realm of pure sacrasm unless he's posting on BBC. So yes that is the correct way to read Carnage4u's post.

Galak
Mordredd - Nov 16, 2004 - 08:12 AM
Post subject:
I just wanted to make a quick comment about advertising and tickets sales. I think that these events need to be well advertised many months in advance if you want people to fly to them. I was seriously considering going to the Spike but would have needed to combine it with a visit to my (only US) relatives in New York to justify the expense. For this to work I would have really wanted the tickets to have gone on sale more like 3 months before the event. I'm not prepared to risk booking flights and hotels only to find that I can't get a ticket to the event, and I need that much time to organise things. I think that most people incorporating a tourney into some kind of holiday will not be happy doing everything at short notice. Also a good deal of thought should be given to timing with regard to the cost of flights. The Spike was just a few weeks on the wrong side of a fairly big price hike on transatlantic flights (something like August = £200, September = £350).
Old_Man_Monkey - Nov 16, 2004 - 08:15 AM
Post subject:
Agreed 100%, Mordredd - this has been a constant battle with all but the Blood Bowl... should the NAF become meaningfully involved, this will be a priority, as much for the ability to check and recheck and plan properly as well as to notify coaches and promote the tournament...
Grumbledook - Nov 16, 2004 - 11:43 AM
Post subject:
i got my canadian flights for £250, mind you i booked them in april

nearly had a heart attack when ant told me they might be changing the dates heh
Carnage4u - Nov 18, 2004 - 07:23 PM
Post subject:
      GalakStarscraper wrote:
Brian posts anymore in the realm of pure sacrasm unless he's posting on BBC. So yes that is the correct way to read Carnage4u's post.

Galak



actually thats not true

i save 95% of all sarcasim posts for bloodbowl.com

altough there was indirect saracasim im my post.

basically just calm down if the chaos cup donest have X people.

sadly i missed it, but from everything i hear, everyone had fun, and it was a good time.

I dont knw what else you want out of a tourament.
All times are
Powered by PNphpBB2 © 2003-2009 The Zafenio Team
Credits