| Author |
Message |
stad |
|
Post subject: Clarification: Conceding a Game in a Tourney, end result
 Posted: Jun 15, 2017 - 03:27 PM
|
|
Joined: Jun 14, 2017
Canada
Posts: 1
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
|
|
Hi, new to NAF and while reading the CRP I could not find out how to finalize a tournament game if one player concedes due to only having 2 players able to take the pitch after a drive. In a league there is no penalty for just 2 players on the pitch, but in a tournament I could not find anything.
Any clarification or document would be appreciated.
Thanks |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
Tojurub |
|
|
Post subject: RE: Clarification: Conceding a Game in a Tourney, end result
Posted: Jun 15, 2017 - 03:45 PM
|
|
Joined: Aug 18, 2003
Germany
Posts: 1520
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
|
|
| that is handled differently for each tournament. Each Tournament Organizer has to put this in his rules pack for his tourney. But in general, it counts as a loss and doesn't have the same effect as during league play since there is no post game procedure. Most tourneys give negative points for a "real" concession, but if a player can't field enough players, regular game play occurs and it counts as a regular game result (mostly ending in a loss) |
_________________
Dwarves rule!!! Especially when they pass!
3rd place Underworld Cup 2003
Swiss Champion 2004
2nd place Royal RumBBL 2015 and White Star Cup 2016
.....and now Ex-Vize-Prez
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: RE: Clarification: Conceding a Game in a Tourney, end result
Posted: Jun 16, 2017 - 02:43 PM
|
|
Joined: Feb 10, 2003
Undisclosed
Posts: 2696
Location: Undisclosed
|
|
| Though it does beg the question, why concede? Just place the two (or less) on the LOS. Most tournaments (though not all) make a loss better than a concession. |
_________________
_____ and rankings - that is all
#27 of the "24 club" (due to some dodgy accounting)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
mechmage |
|
|
Post subject: Re: RE: Clarification: Conceding a Game in a Tourney, end re
Posted: Apr 23, 2019 - 03:01 PM
|
|
Joined: Apr 23, 2019
United States of America
Posts: 1
Location: United States of America
Status: Offline
|
|
Darkson wrote: Though it does beg the question, why concede? Just place the two (or less) on the LOS. Most tournaments (though not all) make a loss better than a concession.
If you only put two players on the line of scrimmage it's not a legal set up since you need at least three. The coaches with two players can not make a legal set up and therefore must concede.
What I'd like to know is what happens if both coaches can only field two players? Must it be the kicking team who concerned since they must set up their defense first or is the game a draw? |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Re: RE: Clarification: Conceding a Game in a Tourney, end re
Posted: Apr 24, 2019 - 01:38 AM
|
|
Joined: Feb 10, 2003
Undisclosed
Posts: 2696
Location: Undisclosed
|
|
mechmage wrote: If you only put two players on the line of scrimmage it's not a legal set up since you need at least three. The coaches with two players can not make a legal set up and therefore must concede.
Incorrect (at least in CRP/LRB6, no idea if GW have changed it for BB2016):
CRP, p.6 'Setting up the Game' wrote: If you cannot set up 3 players on the Line of Scrimmage you must either concede the match (see page 15 (or page 29 if you are using the Extra Rules)), or carry on playing by placing as many players on the line of scrimmage as possible.
Underlining the relevant line. |
_________________
_____ and rankings - that is all
#27 of the "24 club" (due to some dodgy accounting)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
