| Author |
Message |
Ratin_Mutants |
|
Post subject: Pilling On
 Posted: Jul 20, 2003 - 03:09 PM
|
|
Joined: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 57
Status: Offline
|
|
Can pilling On be used, if the attacker Goes down as well as the defender? My logic would say no... but the rules only say
" The player may use this skill after he has made a block, but only if
the victim was knocked over. The player falls on top of the player
that he has just knocked down and may add his Strength to the
Armour roll for the victim. For obvious reasons, when a player uses
this skill he is knocked over as well. However, do not make an
Armour roll for the player who is piling on, as his fall is cushioned
by the victim. Note that the player who is piling on is knocked over
in his own square rather than that of his victim ??? it is assumed that
he rolls back there after flattening his opponent. If the player has
pushed back his opponent before knocking him over, then he must
follow up the block if he can in order to use this skill. Piling on does
not cause a turnover unless the piling on player is carrying the ball." |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
jmccubbin |
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Jul 20, 2003 - 07:07 PM
|
|
Joined: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 152
Status: Offline
|
|
No, I asked this one earlier. Pow Skulls results in both attacher and defender going down.
"The player falls on top of the player that he has just knocked down and may add his Strength to the Armour roll for the victim"
If the attacker is already down from the block, then he cannot fulfill this part of the skill. |
_________________
Officially 0-1-1 in NAF.
At least my team looked good.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
pastaga |
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Jul 21, 2003 - 06:37 AM
|
|
Joined: Feb 28, 2003
Posts: 15
Status: Offline
|
|
The attacker must follow the down defender if he want to use eventulay his pilling on skill ?
Personnally, I have frenezy with my norse blitzers  , so I don't need to ask that.. but ... ? |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Jul 21, 2003 - 07:12 AM
|
|
Joined: Feb 10, 2003
Undisclosed
Posts: 2696
Location: Undisclosed
|
|
| Yep, you must follow up to use PO. |
_________________
_____ and rankings - that is all
#27 of the "24 club" (due to some dodgy accounting)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
jejaatin |
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Aug 18, 2003 - 06:20 AM
|
|
Joined: May 05, 2003
Posts: 37
Status: Offline
|
|
| When do you actually get to decide whether or not to use PO? Before or after armour roll? |
_________________
It's not how you play the Game, It's how the Game plays you.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Indigo |
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Aug 18, 2003 - 08:01 AM
|
|
Da Warboss
Joined: Feb 12, 2003
England
Posts: 2168
Location: England
Status: Offline
|
|
Technically after, but 99% of people say this overpowers it so a LOT of leagues use the rule that it needs to be declared before...
You could trial a variant whereby using PO let's you re-roll the Armour roll - if attempted, regardless of the result, the player goes down. |
_________________
NAF #60
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Didacsoy |
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Sep 19, 2003 - 07:04 AM
|
|
Joined: Sep 17, 2003
Spain
Posts: 18
Status: Offline
|
|
Just for the record, guys:
What about the possibility of throwing pow skulls, having Pilling On AND Block? the dice said "both down" but in fact the attacker didn't go down... and besides, he didn't follow up. Wouldn't he get to use PO?
I think he could, since the opponent went down and the attacking player is still standing (wow! Elton John's flavoured one!) to jump over some unprotected backbone  |
_________________
"I'm the Child of the Stars,
the Blaster of the Gods
and I have seen it all before...
before the WAR!"
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
