| Author |
Message |
Tutenkharnage |
|
Post subject:
 Posted: Feb 12, 2004 - 03:11 PM
|
|
Joined: Feb 11, 2003
Posts: 620
Status: Offline
|
|
In my tabletop league, turning from stunned to prone will no longer be an action. And yes, you'll get the +2 bonus to the roll if you declare a Foul with the WA.
-Chet |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Feb 12, 2004 - 03:20 PM
|
|
Joined: Feb 10, 2003
Undisclosed
Posts: 2696
Location: Undisclosed
|
|
| With those additions I'd consider palying a WA then. I still prefer the straight +2 for having a standing teammate in the WA TZ (a la Really Stupid), but I think this is the best version bar that. |
_________________
_____ and rankings - that is all
#27 of the "24 club" (due to some dodgy accounting)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Feb 12, 2004 - 03:21 PM
|
|
Joined: Feb 10, 2003
Undisclosed
Posts: 2696
Location: Undisclosed
|
|
Tutenkharnage wrote: In my tabletop league, turning from stunned to prone will no longer be an action.
So no BH/RS roll either? (Which I agree with btw.) |
_________________
_____ and rankings - that is all
#27 of the "24 club" (due to some dodgy accounting)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Tutenkharnage |
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Feb 13, 2004 - 06:52 AM
|
|
Joined: Feb 11, 2003
Posts: 620
Status: Offline
|
|
No BH/RS roll for going from stunned to prone. As for a straight +2 for a standing team-mate ala RS - at that point, why not give them RS instead? This feels much "wilder," and it's not clearly better (IMO) than BH.
-Chet |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
