NAF Logo
leftstar May 28, 2024 - 06:01 PM
capleft
spacer
NAF World Headquarters
home forum rankings tourneys nyleague faq
Tournament Director in ratings fix scandal! rightstar
capright

Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Printable version Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
Zombie
Post subject:   PostPosted: Feb 06, 2004 - 03:12 PM



Joined: Oct 24, 2003

Posts: 1671

      mikeyc222 wrote:
and while most passes may be made "in situations where you only fumble on a 1" that's not the only time they are made. as a matter of fact i REGULARLY make long passes. that's because i actually use my throwers as throwers and build their skills as PURE passers and make even AG3 passers deep threats.


So what's your point? A thrower with accurate making a long pass still only fumbles on a 1.

      mikeyc222 wrote:
if you would like to play test your proposed rule changes then by all means do so and i will look at any VERIFIABLE data you have the proves your point.


I've been "playtesting" this for about 10 years now. Never played differently. Unfortunately, as my leagues where always table top and never had records kept on computers, i'm afraid that i can't provide any numbers.
 
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
Zombie
Post subject:   PostPosted: Feb 06, 2004 - 03:14 PM



Joined: Oct 24, 2003

Posts: 1671

      Mordredd wrote:
Zombie, foul appearance working when prone is not absurd. I made the argument in the thread about FA earlier. I notice you had no come back then, so just drop it already.


I'm afraid i've lost track of that thread and can't find it anymore. Point it out to me and i'll be sure to give you a satisfactory answer.
 
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
MordreddOffline
Post subject:   PostPosted: Feb 06, 2004 - 04:52 PM



Joined: Mar 03, 2003
England
Posts: 728
Location: England
Status: Offline
How about the one entitled "Does Foul appearrance works all the time?"
 
 View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Zombie
Post subject:   PostPosted: Feb 06, 2004 - 06:46 PM



Joined: Oct 24, 2003

Posts: 1671

I didn't even know which forum to look in! It appears it's in this one. Thanks for pointing it out and i'll get right to it.

_________________
They will slowly add bits of the vault in on each RR leading up to 2007, starting with LRB 4.0, so it will be a slow and agonising death for BB.
 
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
smeborgOffline
Post subject:   PostPosted: Feb 23, 2004 - 05:24 PM



Joined: Feb 16, 2003

Posts: 223

Status: Offline
I would favour a change enabling interceptions to be made AFTER inaccurate passes are scattered.

I understand there would be a few complications, but they don't look difficult to resolve in a simple way.

I agree with Bevan's earlier comments (risky passes are discouraged).

I would add that the current rule favours AG sides and sides that come with Throwers. If you play a low AG side, or one that comes without throwers or catchers, most of your pass attempts could be deemed "risky". It's frustrating to see a pass which has a 1 in 6 chance of going to the target square land neatly in the interceptor's hands every time.

Just my tuppence worth.

Cheers

Smeborg the Fleshless
 
 View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
ApedogOffline
Post subject:   PostPosted: Feb 26, 2004 - 05:58 AM



Joined: Feb 17, 2003

Posts: 146

Status: Offline
This whole argument always seems to come down on the 'it's not realistic' point.

Have you considered that you are playing a game of american football with Orcs and Elves where one team moves while the other waits for them?

And what about the Turnover rule... one player drops the ball and the rest of the team can't move. I think we should get rid of that next Wink

_________________
Munkey

Boom! He's on his back!
 
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
smeborgOffline
Post subject:   PostPosted: Feb 27, 2004 - 01:19 PM



Joined: Feb 16, 2003

Posts: 223

Status: Offline
I wasn't making a proposal on the basis of "realism".

I suggest the rule (or sequence) could be made better from the following points of view (among others):

- Easier to assimilate for newbies (because more in line with common sense). Fewer rules questions.

- Greater variety (and hence more character or colour).

- Some potential for more skilfull coaching (without a corresponding increase in complexity).

I also find the way interception works at the moment (especially with a good interceptor) somewhat mechanistic and automated. Maybe that's just a matter of taste.

Cheers

Smeborg the Fleshless
 
 View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Printable version Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Powered by PNphpBB2 © 2003-2009 The Zafenio Team
Credits