| Author |
Message |
Spazzfist |
|
Post subject:
 Posted: Nov 11, 2004 - 06:06 AM
|
|
Joined: Aug 16, 2004
Canada
Posts: 3954
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
|
|
Graf_Arnhelm wrote: That's "Stupid_Graf_Smartass" then 
Well at least now you know that you won't have to roll to turn yourself over if you fall down!  |
_________________
#1 Nurgle coach in Canada (formerly the world!)
#1 Snotling coach in Canada
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
GalakStarscraper |
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Nov 11, 2004 - 06:43 AM
|
|
Ex-Rulz Committee
Joined: Feb 11, 2003
United States of America
Posts: 1562
Status: Offline
|
|
Ken was right and Zombie was half right (it not overrulled ... its changed my friend).
Anyway the 2004 Rules Review changed the wording of Stunned on the injury chart to get rid of this issue.
Galak |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Nov 11, 2004 - 05:01 PM
|
|
Joined: Oct 24, 2003
Posts: 1671
|
|
| It's changed back. Last i checked, that's called overruled. |
_________________
They will slowly add bits of the vault in on each RR leading up to 2007, starting with LRB 4.0, so it will be a slow and agonising death for BB.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Clan_Skaven |
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Nov 11, 2004 - 05:46 PM
|
|
Joined: Aug 19, 2003
Niagara Falls ON, Canada
Posts: 2604
Location: Niagara Falls ON, Canada
Status: Offline
|
|
Ok so now after all the children are done arguing in the sandbox over the propper wording of this rule,just to be clear on this, it's now roll over for free for all Big Guys, then a Dice Roll to stand up,move, blitz?
Ok thanks.
-Rod- |
_________________
"2006 SPIKE Champion!"
"Death-Bowl IV & V, Most Casualties!, Death-Bowl VI Best Team!"
"2008 Dagger Bowl Champion"
Host of the Warpstone Cup, Q'ermitt Bowl & the Hope Bowl
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Nov 11, 2004 - 07:02 PM
|
|
Joined: Oct 24, 2003
Posts: 1671
|
|
| If the rules review has come out (which would be news to me), then probably yes. Otherwise, then no. |
_________________
They will slowly add bits of the vault in on each RR leading up to 2007, starting with LRB 4.0, so it will be a slow and agonising death for BB.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
GalakStarscraper |
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Nov 11, 2004 - 08:27 PM
|
|
Ex-Rulz Committee
Joined: Feb 11, 2003
United States of America
Posts: 1562
Status: Offline
|
|
Clan-Skaven wrote: Ok so now after all the children are done arguing in the sandbox over the propper wording of this rule,just to be clear on this, it's now roll over for free for all Big Guys, then a Dice Roll to stand up,move, blitz?
Ok thanks.
-Rod- Wait until the end of next week and ask again Rod.
Galak |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Clan_Skaven |
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Nov 11, 2004 - 09:15 PM
|
|
Joined: Aug 19, 2003
Niagara Falls ON, Canada
Posts: 2604
Location: Niagara Falls ON, Canada
Status: Offline
|
|
| Sounds good to me, thanks. |
_________________
"2006 SPIKE Champion!"
"Death-Bowl IV & V, Most Casualties!, Death-Bowl VI Best Team!"
"2008 Dagger Bowl Champion"
Host of the Warpstone Cup, Q'ermitt Bowl & the Hope Bowl
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Mordredd |
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Nov 12, 2004 - 05:07 AM
|
|
Joined: Mar 03, 2003
England
Posts: 728
Location: England
Status: Offline
|
|
Zombie wrote: It's changed back. Last i checked, that's called overruled.
If they were changing their position on how the rule book should be read then yes, maybe just, but they're not. They've decided the rule needed to be changed, so "the rule has been revised" is perhaps more accurate than "the FAQ has been overruled".
Besides "overruled" at the very least implies someone of higher rank changing the earlier decision. For (a soccer) example the main referee might overrule the sideline official, or a tennis umpire would overrule one of the line judges. If either were overturning a previous ruling of their own then it would be, well, "overturned" surely.
Now I don't think that the BBRC outrank themselves, and I don't think that this change was handed down by JJ, so I don't see how you can legitimately say it can be "overruled". |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Clan_Skaven |
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Nov 12, 2004 - 05:44 AM
|
|
Joined: Aug 19, 2003
Niagara Falls ON, Canada
Posts: 2604
Location: Niagara Falls ON, Canada
Status: Offline
|
|
Mordredd wrote: Zombie wrote: It's changed back. Last i checked, that's called overruled.
If they were changing their position on how the rule book should be read then yes, maybe just, but they're not. They've decided the rule needed to be changed, so "the rule has been revised" is perhaps more accurate than "the FAQ has been overruled".
Besides "overruled" at the very least implies someone of higher rank changing the earlier decision. For (a soccer) example the main referee might overrule the sideline official, or a tennis umpire would overrule one of the line judges. If either were overturning a previous ruling of their own then it would be, well, "overturned" surely.
Now I don't think that the BBRC outrank themselves, and I don't think that this change was handed down by JJ, so I don't see how you can legitimately say it can be "overruled".
More sandbox fighting! I think what is being missed here is who cares if the rule was overruled, revised, rewrote, mutated, abducted by aliens then left in a farmer's field, or whatever! It does not matter what you wanna call the change. All that really matters is what the change is. (& Galak said I'll know by the end of next week)
-Rod- |
_________________
"2006 SPIKE Champion!"
"Death-Bowl IV & V, Most Casualties!, Death-Bowl VI Best Team!"
"2008 Dagger Bowl Champion"
Host of the Warpstone Cup, Q'ermitt Bowl & the Hope Bowl
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Mordredd |
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Nov 12, 2004 - 06:06 AM
|
|
Joined: Mar 03, 2003
England
Posts: 728
Location: England
Status: Offline
|
|
Clan-Skaven wrote: More sandbox fighting!
 Wrestling in kitty litter? Ewwww!
Sorry, but aren't you just joining in the 'pointless bickering' yourself now? |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Spazzfist |
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Nov 12, 2004 - 06:10 AM
|
|
Joined: Aug 16, 2004
Canada
Posts: 3954
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
|
|
So how about that stunned rule, eh? I heard that if we wait patiently that our question will be answered......
(Put the pepper spray down Rod, it's just not worth it....) |
_________________
#1 Nurgle coach in Canada (formerly the world!)
#1 Snotling coach in Canada
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
GalakStarscraper |
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Nov 12, 2004 - 08:00 AM
|
|
Ex-Rulz Committee
Joined: Feb 11, 2003
United States of America
Posts: 1562
Status: Offline
|
|
Spazzfist wrote: our question will be answered...... hmmm ... more like made irrelevant than answered ... 
Galak |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Spazzfist |
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Nov 12, 2004 - 08:06 AM
|
|
Joined: Aug 16, 2004
Canada
Posts: 3954
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
|
|
GalakStarscraper wrote: Spazzfist wrote: our question will be answered...... hmmm ... more like made irrelevant than answered ... Galak
AAAARGH! Don't you start! 
(On second, thought Rod, get the pepper spray!) |
_________________
#1 Nurgle coach in Canada (formerly the world!)
#1 Snotling coach in Canada
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
DarkDancer17 |
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Nov 15, 2004 - 05:19 PM
|
|
Joined: Sep 19, 2003
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Posts: 211
Location: Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Status: Offline
|
|
Question then, as this came up in a game I played just recently...
If a Beast of Nurgle gets tacked with the Handicap that gives him Frenzy and Jump Up...
Does he have to roll to simply stand? As there is no cost for Standing? |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Nov 15, 2004 - 05:26 PM
|
|
Joined: Feb 10, 2003
Undisclosed
Posts: 2696
Location: Undisclosed
|
|
| Yes, as standing up can only be done as part of a Move action (even as in this case you are using MA 0). |
_________________
_____ and rankings - that is all
#27 of the "24 club" (due to some dodgy accounting)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
