| Author |
Message |
Doubleskulls |
|
Post subject: NAF Racial Results
 Posted: Jul 20, 2005 - 07:44 PM
|
|
Ex-Rulz Committee
Joined: Mar 05, 2003
Undisclosed
Posts: 2627
Location: Kent, UK
Status: Offline
|
|
As those sad stattos like myself are probably already aware I keep a reasonably upto date breakdown of all the NAF games by race. http://www.irwilliams.com/naf/index.html
We've just finished the Jan-June period for '05. There were over 2000 NAF games recorded in the 6 months - thats over a quarter of all games ever and continues to represent a healthy growth in the number of sanctioned tournaments and size of those tournaments.
Vamps and Ogres both got off to dreadful starts - and are overall worse than Halflings - without about 50 matches recorded for each.
Undead continued to dominate - a .625 record is their best since the very first 6 month period which only represented 17 games (this one was 264  ).
Chaos Dwarves - from their heady peak of a near .600 record CDs have dropped down to .532 - giving them a respectable 6th place for the half year. Obviously that hike in RR cost had the desired effect.
Sputnik is still the most prolific coach with 117 recorded games and over 60 coaches have played at least 50 recorded games. Cyberhare and Geggster jointly hold the record for the most games with a single race (59 games). |
_________________
Ian 'Double Skulls' Williams
SLOBB
NAF Racial Results
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
Graf_Arnhelm |
|
|
Post subject: Re: NAF Racial Results
Posted: Jul 21, 2005 - 01:34 AM
|
|
Joined: May 13, 2004
Posts: 215
Status: Offline
|
|
Doubleskulls wrote:
Vamps and Ogres both got off to dreadful starts - and are overall worse than Halflings - without about 50 matches recorded for each.
Now that I achieved my goal with Vamps, I'll try to wreak havok with the Race Rankings of other races 
But I was still surprised to see other coaches ranking below me (I rank above Darkson with Skaven; something to rub his nose in at the NBA). And I thought I was a sucker  |
_________________
All well considered, Camelot's a silly place
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Emberbreeze |
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Jul 21, 2005 - 02:11 AM
|
|
Joined: Feb 19, 2004
Posts: 323
Status: Offline
|
|
Yeah, if only my 3 wins with vamps counted for NAF 
My win ratio is 0.433, but V naf it is only 0.292
I think I can get vamps up to 0.500 win ratio, still experimeting with different rosters (and tournaments which allow stars help, as I love Luthor!) |
_________________
Hag Graef Dragons Tournament Record 22:9:14 NAF Record 18:7:11
Silvania Suckers Tournament Record 8:2:11 NAF Record 5:2:11
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Graf_Arnhelm |
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Jul 21, 2005 - 05:08 AM
|
|
Joined: May 13, 2004
Posts: 215
Status: Offline
|
|
Could be worse. They counted only two losses, wheras it should have been 0/2/4, with 4-14 TDs and 9-19 CASs.
Another reason not to count games against non-NAF coaches |
_________________
All well considered, Camelot's a silly place
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Jul 21, 2005 - 12:25 PM
|
|
Joined: Feb 10, 2003
Undisclosed
Posts: 2696
Location: Undisclosed
|
|
Yeah, yeah, yeah, it just seems all my wins are against non-NAF.
Anyway, I suck, so anyone below me with non-stunty teams should hang their heads in shame.  |
_________________
_____ and rankings - that is all
#27 of the "24 club" (due to some dodgy accounting)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
