Author |
Message |
Pyrius |
|
Post subject: Casualty against a player with Multiple Block
Posted: Apr 06, 2003 - 02:50 PM
|
|
Joined: Feb 14, 2003
Posts: 12
Status: Offline
|
|
If a player with Multiple Block blocks two players and get´s hurt, which of the two players will get the SPP´s for the casualty ?
One randomly selected player 2SPP´s, both 1 SPP, od both 2 SPP´s ? |
_________________ Es ist nicht die Frage ob man paranoid ist,
es ist die Frage ob man paranoid genug ist.
|
|
|
|
|
Kyrie |
|
Post subject: what a question
Posted: Apr 06, 2003 - 03:31 PM
|
|
Joined: Mar 11, 2003
Posts: 33
Status: Offline
|
|
It seems to me that it will be randomly selected.
Is the same question if that Multiple block player hurts one of those who blocked |
|
|
|
|
|
skummy |
|
Post subject:
Posted: Apr 06, 2003 - 07:06 PM
|
|
Joined: Feb 11, 2003
Posts: 506
Status: Offline
|
|
What happens if one of the players has Mighty Blow and uses it to get the casualty? Do you still roll? If both players have Mighty Blow, can you use one to get through the armor and the second on injury? This might be a good addition to the Hot List... |
_________________ The only thing to do with good advice is pass it on. It is never any use to oneself.
-Oscar Wilde
|
|
|
|
|
Jmac |
|
Post subject:
Posted: Apr 06, 2003 - 07:57 PM
|
|
Joined: Feb 13, 2003
Posts: 57
Status: Offline
|
|
Here's my question. Since both players make injury/armor rolls. Do both players have the opportunity to get a casualty? Therefor having the blocking player who fails his block recieving 2 casualties against him. I think this sounds more fair since the Blocking player has the chance to score 2 casualties from the block himself. |
_________________ "Football incorporates the two worst elements of American society: violence punctuated by committee meetings."
|
|
|
|
|
GalakStarscraper |
|
Post subject: Re: what a question
Posted: Apr 06, 2003 - 09:15 PM
|
|
Ex-Rulz Committee
Joined: Feb 11, 2003
United States of America
Posts: 1562
Status: Offline
|
|
Kyrie wrote: It seems to me that it will be randomly selected.
Is the same question if that Multiple block player hurts one of those who blocked
Actually no, because you do the AV/INJ seperately. But yes, I would say roll a D6 ... 1-3 player 1 ... 4-6 player 2
Galak |
|
|
|
|
|
Agentrock |
|
Post subject:
Posted: Apr 07, 2003 - 01:40 PM
|
|
Joined: Mar 21, 2003
Posts: 182
Status: Offline
|
|
This is something that I've never thought about...so if a multiple block opponent fails his block and goes down himself, the two players he was attempting to block get to both roll AV/INJ on him? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Apr 07, 2003 - 02:27 PM
|
|
Joined: Feb 11, 2003
Posts: 408
|
|
???
I never thought about it either. Big rewards are justified by big risks. I'd rule that both of the players originally being blocked would get to roll AV but they'd have to do it one at a time and, if the first one got through, what he gets would stand. That way you have 2 opportunities to get through the armor. A person would only have the opportunity to get injured once. |
_________________ Snew
|
|
|
|
|
Agentrock |
|
Post subject:
Posted: Apr 07, 2003 - 02:31 PM
|
|
Joined: Mar 21, 2003
Posts: 182
Status: Offline
|
|
Or choose one randomly to roll AV/INJ first...if his passes through armor and injures then the second one doesn't have to...if it doesn't, then you have the second guy to possibly get through the armor. |
_________________ The end-zone ???line of death??? does not discriminate when one tempts fate by using a ???go for it??? to pass over it.
|
|
|
|
|
Mordredd |
|
Post subject:
Posted: Apr 08, 2003 - 04:52 AM
|
|
Joined: Mar 03, 2003
England
Posts: 728
Location: England
Status: Offline
|
|
I would have said the coach should choose which player is making the armour roll before rolling the dice. Otherwise choose one at random. |
|
|
|
|
|
Auciello |
|
Post subject:
Posted: Apr 09, 2003 - 11:12 PM
|
|
Joined: Mar 25, 2003
Canada
Posts: 24
Status: Offline
|
|
I don't see why both players can't be given credit for a casualty.
Give 'em both two points. They were in on it together. |
|
|
|
|
|
|