| Author |
Message |
Dave |
|
Post subject:
 Posted: Apr 18, 2003 - 03:10 AM
|
|
da Veiz-Prez
Joined: Feb 10, 2003
Netherlands
Posts: 895
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
|
|
there's allways the big une up in the sky   |
_________________
First ever poster on the NAF site, Former Prez' proverbial pain in the bum and NTO-Netherlands
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
Agentrock |
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Apr 18, 2003 - 06:35 AM
|
|
Joined: Mar 21, 2003
Posts: 182
Status: Offline
|
|
And Nuffle, don't forget about him! Or her!? Or it?!?  |
_________________
The end-zone ???line of death??? does not discriminate when one tempts fate by using a ???go for it??? to pass over it.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Apr 18, 2003 - 06:54 AM
|
|
Joined: Feb 11, 2003
Posts: 408
|
|
GalakStarscraper wrote: 1) As it currently reads, a stunned Vampire must make an OFAB roll to go prone and if it fails its a turnover ...... (I think that was just an editing mistake and the MBBL is adding back the text that Stunned vampires don't roll for the new OFAB).
If Bonehead and Really Stupid need to be rolled to turn the player over, don't you think the Vamp should need to do it too? Being a turnover for failing to roll over, though, is a bit harsh. |
_________________
Snew
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Agentrock |
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Apr 18, 2003 - 07:01 AM
|
|
Joined: Mar 21, 2003
Posts: 182
Status: Offline
|
|
snotsngrots wrote: If Bonehead and Really Stupid need to be rolled to turn the player over, don't you think the Vamp should need to do it too?
That's true...they should be consistant. |
_________________
The end-zone ???line of death??? does not discriminate when one tempts fate by using a ???go for it??? to pass over it.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Gattolardo |
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Apr 18, 2003 - 08:33 AM
|
|
Joined: Mar 10, 2003
Posts: 169
Status: Offline
|
|
Well, there MIGHT be some consistency...
While it's quite likely that a stupid player wold stay down staring at the grass carpet, a vamp would, at least, be able to control himself enough to make a try to get up...
What would hr do once up it's another matter altogheter...
So, while a stupid player should test even when rolling over, the first test of the vamp would be upon getting up... 
Well, as long as logic is applicable ina fantay setting 
Cheers
Rob |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Agentrock |
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Apr 18, 2003 - 08:41 AM
|
|
Joined: Mar 21, 2003
Posts: 182
Status: Offline
|
|
| Maybe one could argue that "hunger pains" inflict the vamp so much that it won't roll over from a stun on a failed OFaB... |
_________________
The end-zone ???line of death??? does not discriminate when one tempts fate by using a ???go for it??? to pass over it.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Gattolardo |
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Apr 18, 2003 - 09:06 AM
|
|
Joined: Mar 10, 2003
Posts: 169
Status: Offline
|
|
Yup
but i fear that "Hunger Pains" would only speed up a Vamp getting up  |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Agentrock |
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Apr 18, 2003 - 09:58 AM
|
|
Joined: Mar 21, 2003
Posts: 182
Status: Offline
|
|
| Hmmm..."since the vamp is stunned his/her body doesn't react well to the pains, so his/her body enters a state of temporary hybernation until the next turn"...of course I'm pulling this outta no-where but it sounds good! |
_________________
The end-zone ???line of death??? does not discriminate when one tempts fate by using a ???go for it??? to pass over it.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
GalakStarscraper |
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Apr 18, 2003 - 10:56 AM
|
|
Ex-Rulz Committee
Joined: Feb 11, 2003
United States of America
Posts: 1562
Status: Offline
|
|
Agentrock wrote: Hmmm..."since the vamp is stunned his/her body doesn't react well to the pains, so his/her body enters a state of temporary hybernation until the next turn"...of course I'm pulling this outta no-where but it sounds good!
Uh.... isn't it easier to just say they don't roll if Stunned ... (extra 3 words in the text description) ... I'm trying to keep the skill easy. If the Vamps are too good from extra testing ... fine have them roll for Stunned to Prone ... but causing a turnover for this is a pretty big negative.
Galak |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Agentrock |
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Apr 18, 2003 - 11:19 AM
|
|
Joined: Mar 21, 2003
Posts: 182
Status: Offline
|
|
Sure it is...someone was just mentioning why would they have to test to roll over...
But I agree, it shouldn't be a turnover if they fail while stunned. |
_________________
The end-zone ???line of death??? does not discriminate when one tempts fate by using a ???go for it??? to pass over it.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Apr 19, 2003 - 02:30 PM
|
|
Joined: Feb 10, 2003
Undisclosed
Posts: 2696
Location: Undisclosed
|
|
Agentrock wrote: And Nuffle, don't forget about him! Or her!? Or it?!?
Nuffle sucks, whatever it is!
Please, stop hurting my vamps anymore than they are. I just killed my only thrall that gained a skill with a COFAB roll.
With the new list I wouldn't risk having anymore than 6 vamps on the roster until they had PRO, and I'd probably start with 4 and as many thralls as I could afford. |
_________________
_____ and rankings - that is all
#27 of the "24 club" (due to some dodgy accounting)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Apr 19, 2003 - 04:48 PM
|
|
Joined: Feb 11, 2003
Posts: 408
|
|
Darkson wrote: With the new list I wouldn't risk having anymore than 6 vamps on the roster until they had PRO, and I'd probably start with 4 and as many thralls as I could afford.
You say that like it's some substandard roster or something. |
_________________
Snew
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Apr 19, 2003 - 06:28 PM
|
|
Joined: Feb 10, 2003
Undisclosed
Posts: 2696
Location: Undisclosed
|
|
snotsngrots wrote: Darkson wrote: With the new list I wouldn't risk having anymore than 6 vamps on the roster until they had PRO, and I'd probably start with 4 and as many thralls as I could afford.
You say that like it's some substandard roster or something.
It is when the vamps all catch the Elven Curse |
_________________
_____ and rankings - that is all
#27 of the "24 club" (due to some dodgy accounting)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Apr 19, 2003 - 08:36 PM
|
|
Joined: Feb 11, 2003
Posts: 408
|
|
Darkson wrote: snotsngrots wrote: Darkson wrote: With the new list I wouldn't risk having anymore than 6 vamps on the roster until they had PRO, and I'd probably start with 4 and as many thralls as I could afford.
You say that like it's some substandard roster or something.
It is when the vamps all catch the Elven Curse
You need to teach them to stay away from those slender Elven necks then. |
_________________
Snew
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Dave |
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Apr 24, 2003 - 02:33 AM
|
|
da Veiz-Prez
Joined: Feb 10, 2003
Netherlands
Posts: 895
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
|
|
Yeah, do that...
Maybe I lack some eye - sight but where should the vamp, who rolled a '1', make his move action to?
Towards his nearest team member, tot he dug out or where ever?
I can't seem to find it.
 |
_________________
First ever poster on the NAF site, Former Prez' proverbial pain in the bum and NTO-Netherlands
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
