Author |
Message |
Rune_Master |
|
Post subject: Vampire Lord?
Posted: May 27, 2006 - 05:41 AM
|
|
Joined: Apr 02, 2005
Posts: 196
Status: Offline
|
|
I was looking for tactics online for vampire teams, and I noticed a number of them (due to their age) made mention of using a Vampire "Lord". Even on the GW online store, the box set says it contains a Lord.
I assume the Lord player was removed for LRB 4, and I didn't see a mention of it on the LRB 5 linked at the Specialist Games forum. Can anyone explain why this player option was removed from that team list? |
_________________ Erik Grogswiller
"Ho! stand to your flagons steady!
'Tis all we have left to prize.
A drink to the dead already,--
Hurrah for the next that dies."
- ancient Dwarf toast
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: May 27, 2006 - 02:43 PM
|
|
Joined: Feb 10, 2003
Undisclosed
Posts: 2696
Location: Undisclosed
|
|
Because it was felt (and I agree) that a Vamp player without a negatrait was to powerful. |
_________________ _____ and rankings - that is all
#27 of the "24 club" (due to some dodgy accounting)
|
|
|
|
|
KarlLagerbottom |
|
Post subject:
Posted: May 27, 2006 - 07:21 PM
|
|
Joined: May 25, 2004
Undisclosed
Posts: 1148
Location: Undisclosed
Status: Offline
|
|
Yep...I guess Wardancers starting as Blodgers with leap are really loads worse than a Vampire with no neg-trait. Especially considering that the majority of the team has no skills.
Having one player on the team that you can count on is more of a hiderance to the vamp player in terms of team development...but i don't agree that it makes the team a powerhouse.
-Rob |
_________________ Karl Lagerbottom - Dwarf Blocker of Renown
NAF Member #5236
---
|
|
|
|
|
GalakStarscraper |
|
Post subject:
Posted: May 28, 2006 - 08:24 PM
|
|
Ex-Rulz Committee
Joined: Feb 11, 2003
United States of America
Posts: 1562
Status: Offline
|
|
KarlLagerbottom wrote: Having one player on the team that you can count on is more of a hiderance to the vamp player in terms of team development...but i don't agree that it makes the team a powerhouse.
-Rob Last Vampire team I played with a Vampire Lord ... the Lord scored 51 TD BY HIMSELF (not counting the other TDs of the team) in 13 games.
Yup ... no problems there ... rrriiiiggghhhtttt
Galak |
|
|
|
|
|
Rune_Master |
|
Post subject:
Posted: May 29, 2006 - 06:28 AM
|
|
Joined: Apr 02, 2005
Posts: 196
Status: Offline
|
|
GalakStarscraper wrote: Last Vampire team I played with a Vampire Lord ... the Lord scored 51 TD BY HIMSELF (not counting the other TDs of the team) in 13 games.
Yup ... no problems there ... rrriiiiggghhhtttt
I don't know, doesn't sound like you were having any problems!
Anyway, I can understand if the Lord character was too unbalanced, but rather than eliminate, why wasn't he balanced? And didn't the Lord come with OFAB? Isn't that a neg-trait?
Just seems to me that, fluff-wise, having a Lord on the field for a Vampire team seems "right".
my two cents... |
_________________ Erik Grogswiller
"Ho! stand to your flagons steady!
'Tis all we have left to prize.
A drink to the dead already,--
Hurrah for the next that dies."
- ancient Dwarf toast
|
|
|
|
|
Clan_Skaven |
|
Post subject:
Posted: May 29, 2006 - 08:50 AM
|
|
Joined: Aug 19, 2003
Niagara Falls ON, Canada
Posts: 2606
Location: Niagara Falls ON, Canada
Status: Offline
|
|
As far as I can remember the Vamp Lord was
6 movement, 5 strength, 4 agility, & 8 armour, not sure what his skills were, but he did not suffer from off for a bite like the other vamps did.
to me 5 strength, 4 agility player blows away a Wardancer (not even in the same book)
Rod |
_________________ "2006 SPIKE Champion!"
"Death-Bowl IV & V, Most Casualties!, Death-Bowl VI Best Team!"
"2008 Dagger Bowl Champion"
Host of the Warpstone Cup, Q'ermitt Bowl & the Hope Bowl
|
|
|
|
|
Rottweilerrme |
|
Post subject:
Posted: May 29, 2006 - 02:33 PM
|
|
Joined: Jun 29, 2004
Posts: 75
Status: Offline
|
|
The Vampire Lord was a 0-1 at 180k Move 6, Strength 5, Agility 4, Armour 9.
Block, Dodge, Hypnotic Gaze and Regenerate. Page 12 2003 Annual. The negative object they thought of was I guess he could not get any more skills only stat incresess I guess. |
_________________ Don't worry. Anything but a.........1........ DANG IT!!!! Why is my D6 loaded with 1's???
|
|
|
|
|
Spazzfist |
|
Post subject:
Posted: May 29, 2006 - 05:44 PM
|
|
Joined: Aug 16, 2004
Canada
Posts: 3956
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
|
|
I seem to recall there being something about the Vampire Lord being a freebooter, and that you would pay for him for the one game only. Was not playing vamps at the time, so the rules are fuzzy. Was that a rule?
If so, it was certainly a lot of cash to fork out for a one game player with a giant bullseye! |
_________________ #1 Nurgle coach in Canada (formerly the world!)
#1 Snotling coach in Canada
Last edited by Spazzfist on May 29, 2006 - 08:33 PM; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
Doubleskulls |
|
Post subject:
Posted: May 29, 2006 - 08:23 PM
|
|
Ex-Rulz Committee
Joined: Mar 05, 2003
Undisclosed
Posts: 2627
Location: Kent, UK
Status: Offline
|
|
One of the earliest versions of the current vampire team had him as permanent rostered player. Massively unbalanced as Galak pointed out.
@Rune_Master - according to BB background vampires are bad at BB so the current line up (where they are a real challenge) fits that better than a competitive team. |
_________________ Ian 'Double Skulls' Williams
SLOBB
NAF Racial Results
|
|
|
|
|
Rune_Master |
|
Post subject:
Posted: May 30, 2006 - 08:58 AM
|
|
Joined: Apr 02, 2005
Posts: 196
Status: Offline
|
|
Doubleskulls wrote: @Rune_Master - according to BB background vampires are bad at BB so the current line up (where they are a real challenge) fits that better than a competitive team.
I'll can't argue that they are a challenge to play. Just thought it made more sense to balance the Lord character so he is only slighty better than a standard vamp, still at 0-1, just for the sake of having a central character to lead the team.
I'll probably be corrected on this, but in a WFB VC army, isn't the core of the army filled with zombies/skellies (cannon fodder like the thralls), backed up by the true power of the army, the vampires, often lead by a lord?
Eh, whatever....I'm going to build a team anyway, and I may not coach them well, but I'm up for the challenge! Somebodies got to be #2 in the U.S.!!!! |
_________________ Erik Grogswiller
"Ho! stand to your flagons steady!
'Tis all we have left to prize.
A drink to the dead already,--
Hurrah for the next that dies."
- ancient Dwarf toast
|
|
|
|
|
Clan_Skaven |
|
Post subject:
Posted: May 30, 2006 - 09:03 AM
|
|
Joined: Aug 19, 2003
Niagara Falls ON, Canada
Posts: 2606
Location: Niagara Falls ON, Canada
Status: Offline
|
|
Rune_Master wrote: Doubleskulls wrote: @Rune_Master - according to BB background vampires are bad at BB so the current line up (where they are a real challenge) fits that better than a competitive team.
I'll can't argue that they are a challenge to play. Just thought it made more sense to balance the Lord character so he is only slighty better than a standard vamp, still at 0-1, just for the sake of having a central character to lead the team.
I'll probably be corrected on this, but in a WFB VC army, isn't the core of the army filled with zombies/skellies (cannon fodder like the thralls), backed up by the true power of the army, the vampires, often lead by a lord?
Eh, whatever....I'm going to build a team anyway, and I may not coach them well, but I'm up for the challenge! Somebodies got to be #2 in the U.S.!!!!
As stated many times in the past , The BloodBowl Universe & WHFB Universe are two completely diferent Universes & timelines. So what Vamps are in one has no bearing on the other.
Rod. |
_________________ "2006 SPIKE Champion!"
"Death-Bowl IV & V, Most Casualties!, Death-Bowl VI Best Team!"
"2008 Dagger Bowl Champion"
Host of the Warpstone Cup, Q'ermitt Bowl & the Hope Bowl
|
|
|
|
|
Rune_Master |
|
Post subject:
Posted: May 30, 2006 - 10:01 AM
|
|
Joined: Apr 02, 2005
Posts: 196
Status: Offline
|
|
Clan-Skaven wrote:
As stated many times in the past , The BloodBowl Universe & WHFB Universe are two completely diferent Universes & timelines. So what Vamps are in one has no bearing on the other.
Rod.
I don't know about "completely different", there are similarities. But that's fine, with good reason I wasn't asked to write the rules, so I'll just play the game. |
_________________ Erik Grogswiller
"Ho! stand to your flagons steady!
'Tis all we have left to prize.
A drink to the dead already,--
Hurrah for the next that dies."
- ancient Dwarf toast
|
|
|
|
|
Doubleskulls |
|
Post subject:
Posted: May 30, 2006 - 07:44 PM
|
|
Ex-Rulz Committee
Joined: Mar 05, 2003
Undisclosed
Posts: 2627
Location: Kent, UK
Status: Offline
|
|
The similarities are delibertely being reduced. JJ wants to move away from WFB and back to the cyber-fantasy theme of 2nd ed. |
_________________ Ian 'Double Skulls' Williams
SLOBB
NAF Racial Results
|
|
|
|
|
KarlLagerbottom |
|
Post subject:
Posted: May 30, 2006 - 08:19 PM
|
|
Joined: May 25, 2004
Undisclosed
Posts: 1148
Location: Undisclosed
Status: Offline
|
|
GalakStarscraper wrote: Last Vampire team I played with a Vampire Lord ... the Lord scored 51 TD BY HIMSELF (not counting the other TDs of the team) in 13 games.
Yup ... no problems there ... rrriiiiggghhhtttt
Galak
Big difference? ON Pitch OFAB...where you are killing your own players...what was the worst thing that could happen before...2 vamps miss the drive. Now 5 vampires could be gunning aftyer your own players each drive...then they are targets on offense and on defense.
EDIT: Sure the Lord was a SPP Hog...but as I said earlier that will severly hamper the team's development.
P.S. My Vamp Lord also managed to get a Magic Helmet. He was unstoppable, but was still only one player. |
_________________ Karl Lagerbottom - Dwarf Blocker of Renown
NAF Member #5236
---
Last edited by KarlLagerbottom on May 30, 2006 - 08:29 PM; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
KarlLagerbottom |
|
Post subject:
Posted: May 30, 2006 - 08:24 PM
|
|
Joined: May 25, 2004
Undisclosed
Posts: 1148
Location: Undisclosed
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|