Author |
Message |
SBG |
|
Post subject: No Wizards, but lower cost 200K cards?
Posted: Jun 02, 2008 - 08:21 PM
|
|
Joined: Feb 15, 2003
Canada
Posts: 789
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
|
|
Hi guys!
We don't really like wizards here, but I admit they are a good inducement to get.
Would removing them as an inducement possibility but lowering the cost of the 200 K cards to 150 K sounds reasonnable to you as a counter-measure?
Fred |
_________________ Winner of Soup Bowls I, II, III (Chaos Dwarves); IV, V (Dwarves); XIII (Orcs); XIV (Dark Elves) & XVII (Chaos).
Forget the Yankees, forget the Habs: THAT'S a Dynasty!!!
|
|
|
|
 |
PubBowler |
|
Post subject: RE: No Wizards, but lower cost 200K cards?
Posted: Jun 03, 2008 - 05:12 AM
|
|
Joined: Mar 26, 2007
Glasgow UK
Posts: 44
Location: Glasgow UK
Status: Offline
|
|
If you don't like them, don't have them.
But I wouldn't change any other inducements, they are balanced for current cost.
And there are lots of other 150k options (stars, mercs etc) |
|
|
|
|
 |
SBG |
|
Post subject: RE: No Wizards, but lower cost 200K cards?
Posted: Jun 03, 2008 - 10:44 AM
|
|
Joined: Feb 15, 2003
Canada
Posts: 789
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
|
|
Yeah it was my first option, I think I'll stick with it.
Fred |
_________________ Winner of Soup Bowls I, II, III (Chaos Dwarves); IV, V (Dwarves); XIII (Orcs); XIV (Dark Elves) & XVII (Chaos).
Forget the Yankees, forget the Habs: THAT'S a Dynasty!!!
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|