Author |
Message |
SBG |
|
Post subject: HUman Blitzer Ag 4
Posted: Nov 06, 2010 - 09:33 PM
|
|
Joined: Feb 15, 2003
Canada
Posts: 789
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
|
|
Hey guys!
One of my blitzers just got an AG increase on the first skill!
I was wondering which directions you were going starting from there. Since it came on the first skill roll, I thought it opened a lot of possibilities, and wanted some inputs!
Fred |
_________________ Winner of Soup Bowls I, II, III (Chaos Dwarves); IV, V (Dwarves); XIII (Orcs); XIV (Dark Elves) & XVII (Chaos).
Forget the Yankees, forget the Habs: THAT'S a Dynasty!!!
|
|
|
|
 |
SBG |
|
Post subject: RE: HUman Blitzer Ag 4
Posted: Nov 09, 2010 - 11:51 AM
|
|
Joined: Feb 15, 2003
Canada
Posts: 789
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
|
|
Nobody wnats to chime in?
Come on! don't be shy!
Fred |
_________________ Winner of Soup Bowls I, II, III (Chaos Dwarves); IV, V (Dwarves); XIII (Orcs); XIV (Dark Elves) & XVII (Chaos).
Forget the Yankees, forget the Habs: THAT'S a Dynasty!!!
|
|
|
|
 |
Spazzfist |
|
Post subject: RE: HUman Blitzer Ag 4
Posted: Nov 09, 2010 - 12:34 PM
|
|

Joined: Aug 16, 2004
Canada
Posts: 3963
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
|
|
An AG 4 blitzer can be useful in a variety of roles, so I guess it depends on what you envision him as doing.
I have seen people use similar players as a ball handler, giving them Sure Hands. With his S access, Stand Firm would be good too, which then makes him hard to get off of the sidelines.
On doubles, I would look to Dodge, that is a no-brainer. |
_________________ #1 Nurgle coach in Canada (formerly the world!)
#1 Snotling coach in Canada
|
|
|
|
 |
Frantic |
|
Post subject: RE: HUman Blitzer Ag 4
Posted: Nov 24, 2010 - 02:00 AM
|
|

Joined: Jun 11, 2007
Sweden
Posts: 252
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
 |
Grumbledook |
|
Post subject: RE: HUman Blitzer Ag 4
Posted: Nov 24, 2010 - 03:52 AM
|
|

Joined: Feb 10, 2003
Posts: 922
Status: Offline
|
|
I'd still use him like normal, guard then stand firm or mighty blow, perhaps frenzy + juggernaut
the agility just makes him more mobile and can get where you need him easier and is an extra option for ball handling stuff |
_________________ 'Boomshanker an Interception'
Jon
|
|
|
|
 |
Axtklinge |
|
Post subject: RE: HUman Blitzer Ag 4
Posted: Nov 25, 2010 - 10:00 AM
|
|

Joined: May 29, 2006
Portugal
Posts: 325
Location: Portugal
Status: Offline
|
|
Well you do have a potencial star on you hands.
As it is now I would develp him like any other blitzer, but definitly avoid getting him too stuck in "melees", and use him up in the pitch as if to support catchers (and thinking of him almost like a catcher himself).
If he keeps having nice rolls for improvments (or doubles), then I might start having ideas for him... |
|
|
|
|
 |
SBG |
|
Post subject: Re: RE: HUman Blitzer Ag 4
Posted: Nov 25, 2010 - 11:14 AM
|
|
Joined: Feb 15, 2003
Canada
Posts: 789
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
|
|
Axtklinge wrote: If he keeps having nice rolls for improvments (or doubles), then I might start having ideas for him...
Is a double on the next roll automatically Dodge for this guy? Would NoS be an option you'd consider?
Fred |
_________________ Winner of Soup Bowls I, II, III (Chaos Dwarves); IV, V (Dwarves); XIII (Orcs); XIV (Dark Elves) & XVII (Chaos).
Forget the Yankees, forget the Habs: THAT'S a Dynasty!!!
|
|
|
|
 |
Grumbledook |
|
Post subject: RE: Re: RE: HUman Blitzer Ag 4
Posted: Nov 25, 2010 - 03:26 PM
|
|

Joined: Feb 10, 2003
Posts: 922
Status: Offline
|
|
ew no, dodge or side step
how many times a match do you realistically need to use NOS |
_________________ 'Boomshanker an Interception'
Jon
|
|
|
|
 |
SBG |
|
Post subject: RE: Re: RE: HUman Blitzer Ag 4
Posted: Nov 25, 2010 - 10:18 PM
|
|
Joined: Feb 15, 2003
Canada
Posts: 789
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
|
|
Well, I see those elf catchers and I find them pretty awesome. So if I turn him into an offensive threat, this might be an option.
Fred |
_________________ Winner of Soup Bowls I, II, III (Chaos Dwarves); IV, V (Dwarves); XIII (Orcs); XIV (Dark Elves) & XVII (Chaos).
Forget the Yankees, forget the Habs: THAT'S a Dynasty!!!
|
|
|
|
 |
Grumbledook |
|
Post subject: RE: Re: RE: HUman Blitzer Ag 4
Posted: Nov 26, 2010 - 04:36 AM
|
|

Joined: Feb 10, 2003
Posts: 922
Status: Offline
|
|
he already is an offensive threat, obviously you will get some use out of it but it the same with dodge
if he is tied up with multiple tackle zones then you are more likely to have a catcher unmarked or easily blitzed free, if he isn't marked like that then you can blitz him free instead, ergo rendering NOS pointless a lot of the time
NOS is more use for the elf team cause they don't have 5 players who can take guard as a normal skill
AG4 and NOS is no good when you are more likely to get twatted for not having dodge, or even worse you catch it in tackle zones and then fail the dodge
of course it can be countered by tackle but not everyone has that and if they are, then your catchers are less likely to be getting targeted by it
imo if you want NOS catchers, play the elf team ;] |
_________________ 'Boomshanker an Interception'
Jon
|
|
|
|
 |
daloonieshaman |
|
Post subject:
Posted: Nov 28, 2010 - 04:13 AM
|
|
Joined: Feb 28, 2003
United States of America
Posts: 883
Location: United States of America
Status: Offline
|
|
strip ball
leap
wrestle
cage breaker |
|
|
|
|
 |
SBG |
|
Post subject:
Posted: Jan 12, 2011 - 02:55 PM
|
|
Joined: Feb 15, 2003
Canada
Posts: 789
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
|
|
daloonieshaman wrote: strip ball
leap
wrestle
cage breaker
Don't have the rulebook in front of me, but isn't leap an agility skill?
Anyways, I gave him Guard and find him really useful. Nearing 31 SPP's, and I'm thinking Stand Firm as a second skill.
Fred |
_________________ Winner of Soup Bowls I, II, III (Chaos Dwarves); IV, V (Dwarves); XIII (Orcs); XIV (Dark Elves) & XVII (Chaos).
Forget the Yankees, forget the Habs: THAT'S a Dynasty!!!
|
|
|
|
 |
Trentus |
|
Post subject:
Posted: Jan 12, 2011 - 06:07 PM
|
|

Joined: Jan 09, 2011
Posts: 11
Status: Offline
|
|
Good choices. That's the direction I'd go. |
|
|
|
|
 |
|