| Author |
Message |
|
|
Post subject:
 Posted: Jan 28, 2004 - 02:10 PM
|
|
Joined: Oct 24, 2003
Posts: 1671
|
|
| You were right though Tojurub. I also said in my post that i didn't believe it should be that way anymore, but that you should still always gain all the rerolls despite how many your opponent has. So Chet did agree with me. |
_________________
They will slowly add bits of the vault in on each RR leading up to 2007, starting with LRB 4.0, so it will be a slow and agonising death for BB.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
HighandMighty |
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Feb 03, 2004 - 10:44 AM
|
|
Joined: Feb 16, 2003
Posts: 3
Status: Offline
|
|
| Thanks all. We played it that the haflings could get more rerolls than the opponent has since that appears to be the way the rule is currently worded, though I'd agree that making it only a stealing mechanism, rather than a freeboot rerolls option, seems a bit better. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
