| Author |
Message |
GalakStarscraper |
|
Post subject:
 Posted: Nov 15, 2004 - 06:05 PM
|
|
Ex-Rulz Committee
Joined: Feb 11, 2003
United States of America
Posts: 1562
Status: Offline
|
|
Darkson wrote: Yes, as standing up can only be done as part of a Move action (even as in this case you are using MA 0).
Hmmmm ... Darkson ... I'd say Jump Up overrules the less than MA 3. It says stand up for free. I'd include the roll to stand as part of the price. That's the intention as well. So if folks want to disagree I'll add it to the list of things to rephrase for LRB 5.0 to make more clear.
Galak |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Nov 15, 2004 - 07:10 PM
|
|
Joined: Oct 24, 2003
Posts: 1671
|
|
You can stand up for free once at the start of your action, but you still have to roll for the negative skill before you start your action. Darkson is right. The roll is not part of the action. Standing up is, even if it's free.
Besides, we all know that free only refers to how much movement you have to spend to get up.
How is the roll part of the price paid to stand up? What's the cost? None. What's the risk? None. Since you're down you don't even have a tackle zone to lose.
Of course, all of this is moot since no player can have a negative skill and jump up. |
_________________
They will slowly add bits of the vault in on each RR leading up to 2007, starting with LRB 4.0, so it will be a slow and agonising death for BB.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
DarkDancer17 |
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Nov 15, 2004 - 07:15 PM
|
|
Joined: Sep 19, 2003
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Posts: 211
Location: Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Status: Offline
|
|
| Except, of course, when they are given it by a Handicap, Zombie. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Doubleskulls |
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Nov 15, 2004 - 07:56 PM
|
|
Ex-Rulz Committee
Joined: Mar 05, 2003
Undisclosed
Posts: 2627
Location: Kent, UK
Status: Offline
|
|
| Er - Galak aren't we talking about the negative skill roll? |
_________________
Ian 'Double Skulls' Williams
SLOBB
NAF Racial Results
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Nov 16, 2004 - 11:00 AM
|
|
Joined: Feb 10, 2003
Undisclosed
Posts: 2696
Location: Undisclosed
|
|
Get the feeling Galak might have been thinking about a tree standing up?  |
_________________
_____ and rankings - that is all
#27 of the "24 club" (due to some dodgy accounting)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
GalakStarscraper |
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Nov 16, 2004 - 06:26 PM
|
|
Ex-Rulz Committee
Joined: Feb 11, 2003
United States of America
Posts: 1562
Status: Offline
|
|
A Treeman with Buzzing would not need to roll to stand up.
But yeah .. you'd need to roll for Take Root in the LRB 4.0 before trying to stand.
Galak |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Nov 16, 2004 - 06:32 PM
|
|
Joined: Oct 24, 2003
Posts: 1671
|
|
| And you need to roll for Bonehead, Really Stupid or Wild Animal. |
_________________
They will slowly add bits of the vault in on each RR leading up to 2007, starting with LRB 4.0, so it will be a slow and agonising death for BB.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
GalakStarscraper |
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Nov 16, 2004 - 08:11 PM
|
|
Ex-Rulz Committee
Joined: Feb 11, 2003
United States of America
Posts: 1562
Status: Offline
|
|
Zombie wrote: And you need to roll for Bonehead, Really Stupid or Wild Animal. Definitely agreed on these as well.
Galak |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
GalakStarscraper |
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Nov 17, 2004 - 06:16 AM
|
|
Ex-Rulz Committee
Joined: Feb 11, 2003
United States of America
Posts: 1562
Status: Offline
|
|
Okay the new rules for Stunned should be up today.
Quote:
2004-11-17
Hi Keith,
Can you put this pdf up on the BB website this afternoon. It should be
called 'The 2004 Blood Bowl Rules Review'. It needs to go in the
official
new rules section, and we need a link to it from the news section on
the
front page. I'll add a blog entry this afternoon.
Jervis
<<The2004R.pdf>> |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
