Author |
Message |
absent |
|
Post subject: BB tourneys, conventions vs non conventions...
Posted: Mar 24, 2005 - 08:11 PM
|
|
Joined: Nov 08, 2004
Posts: 119
Status: Offline
|
|
I was wondering how people feel about going to bloodbowl tournaments at conventions as opposed to those held in stores and such, so i thought i'd start a poll, why not? i love polls. |
_________________ absents tournament history
|
|
|
|
|
Xeterog |
|
Post subject:
Posted: Mar 24, 2005 - 10:30 PM
|
|
Joined: Jan 11, 2004
Texas
Posts: 73
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
|
|
I like both ways of holding a tourney..they both have things that are good in my opinion. However, I voted that I like tourneys held at conventions best.
At a convention, there are other things going on. Especially at a big one like GenCon, where the 'event hall' (what most cons call a dealers room really) can be the main attraction for the whole 4 days if you want it to be. But then, tho Blood Bowl is currently my favorite game, I do like alot of other games and enjoy the chance to play a variety of things for a weekend. Basically, a convention allows me to get some of my 'gaming' fix in.
Having a BB tourney at a store is good (TKC2 was excellent) and very entertaining..allows you to spend some time socializing with Coaches from around the world after the tourney games (or before). |
_________________ -Xeterog
(formerly Gortex)
|
|
|
|
|
Graf_Arnhelm |
|
Post subject:
Posted: Mar 25, 2005 - 12:19 AM
|
|
Joined: May 13, 2004
Posts: 215
Status: Offline
|
|
Neither conventions nor tournaments hold much appeal to me, and the store I go most often to (GW Cologne) doesn't provide any BB leagues, even though the game is "officially" supported in Germany (guess it's more nominal support than actual ). |
_________________ All well considered, Camelot's a silly place
|
|
|
|
|
Emberbreeze |
|
Post subject:
Posted: Mar 25, 2005 - 03:44 AM
|
|
Joined: Feb 19, 2004
Posts: 323
Status: Offline
|
|
I vote other, because I've never been to a tournament in a convention |
_________________ Hag Graef Dragons Tournament Record 22:9:14 NAF Record 18:7:11
Silvania Suckers Tournament Record 8:2:11 NAF Record 5:2:11
|
|
|
|
|
Mordredd |
|
Post subject:
Posted: Mar 25, 2005 - 07:57 AM
|
|
Joined: Mar 03, 2003
England
Posts: 728
Location: England
Status: Offline
|
|
Same here. I don't think there even any tournaments held in conventions in the UK anyway. |
|
|
|
|
|
absent |
|
Post subject:
Posted: Mar 25, 2005 - 11:08 AM
|
|
Joined: Nov 08, 2004
Posts: 119
Status: Offline
|
|
interesting results, i should have made a "never been to a convention bb tourney" option... |
_________________ absents tournament history
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Mar 25, 2005 - 12:46 PM
|
|
Joined: Feb 10, 2003
Undisclosed
Posts: 2696
Location: Undisclosed
|
|
Same as Ember and Mordred. |
_________________ _____ and rankings - that is all
#27 of the "24 club" (due to some dodgy accounting)
|
|
|
|
|
Emberbreeze |
|
Post subject:
Posted: Mar 25, 2005 - 12:52 PM
|
|
Joined: Feb 19, 2004
Posts: 323
Status: Offline
|
|
I think BritCon has a small BB tournment sometimes? |
_________________ Hag Graef Dragons Tournament Record 22:9:14 NAF Record 18:7:11
Silvania Suckers Tournament Record 8:2:11 NAF Record 5:2:11
|
|
|
|
|
absent |
|
Post subject:
Posted: Mar 25, 2005 - 02:35 PM
|
|
Joined: Nov 08, 2004
Posts: 119
Status: Offline
|
|
see, in the states you can't hardly find a bloodbowl tourney not at a convention, so you have to pay a convention entry fee and a tourney entry fee every time you want to play a tourney. |
_________________ absents tournament history
|
|
|
|
|
Babs |
|
Post subject:
Posted: Mar 25, 2005 - 04:23 PM
|
|
Ex-Rulz Committee
Joined: Feb 17, 2003
Australia
Posts: 742
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
|
|
I think there are advantages both ways.
At a convention you get more of a 'pass through' crowd - which might draw more people to Blood bowl, and an audience for a final.
At a convention you also get better vendors. This can lead to better prize support as well.
At a private/exclusive venue, you get a more Blood Bowl focused event. There is a better 'vibe', a more quiet or selective feel to the event, and everyone there has Blood Bowl on their mind.
Advantages either way. I like a bit of both. |
_________________ =-) Babs
Washed up old has been.
Ex-official GW Blood Bowl Rules Committee member
Ex-NAF Tournament Organiser, Australasia
Co-Author of the Feudball first novel.
|
|
|
|
|
twist |
|
Post subject:
Posted: Mar 26, 2005 - 02:28 PM
|
|
Joined: Feb 10, 2003
Canada
Posts: 228
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
|
|
I'd agree with Babs 100%. Con Tourneys usually cost more (unless the stand alone tourney is a GW one ), have many more distractions, but usually more prizes at the end of the day.
Having nothing but BB around you at an exclusive event is very cool, very competitive, and a ton of fun! Bragging rights and stuff, ya!
I like them both as well. |
_________________ Twist.
NAF Member 106
Tournament History
HammerBowl. http://bkbbl.com/
|
|
|
|
|
dwarfcoach |
|
Post subject:
Posted: Mar 27, 2005 - 01:45 AM
|
|
The Best Dressed Man in Blood Bowl
Joined: Apr 13, 2003
Posts: 764
Status: Offline
|
|
Voted the same as Ember, Mordred and Darkson as I've never been to a tourney that was at a convention. It does make me wonder what it would be like; I could see it as either being a good or a bad thing depending how many other of your hobbies are represented at the event and how strong your commitment to these other hobbies are verses you commitment to BB...
Still, over all it sounds a good laugh, are there really none like this in the Uk? |
_________________ Chuck Norris does not sleep. He waits.
224th at The World Cup II
|
|
|
|
|
Chunky |
|
Post subject:
Posted: Mar 27, 2005 - 03:54 AM
|
|
Joined: Feb 16, 2005
Posts: 165
Status: Offline
|
|
I voted other. I haven't been to a Blood Bowl tourney in this sort of venue yet, but I've been to a number of WHFB tourneys in licensed clubs in Australia, and have always enjoyed these most. |
_________________ Come to Eucalyptus Bowl!
http://eucalyptus-bowl.doubleskulls.net/
|
|
|
|
|
Doubleskulls |
|
Post subject:
Posted: Mar 27, 2005 - 08:34 PM
|
|
Ex-Rulz Committee
Joined: Mar 05, 2003
Undisclosed
Posts: 2627
Location: Kent, UK
Status: Offline
|
|
All the tournaments I've been to in Europe have been stand alone BB events. Often held in community centres (and the odd pub). Concentration of players helps get a high attendence.
In Australia (and presumably the Canada & US too) conventions rule the roost. So BB is played as just one system among many. Its nice to have all the stalls etc - and the extra pull looks likely to be vital to getting the numbers.
TBH I think I prefer the concentrated BB atmosphere at standalone tournaments - also I think they often offer better value for money as the organiser isn't making a profit either. |
_________________ Ian 'Double Skulls' Williams
SLOBB
NAF Racial Results
|
|
|
|
|
Paul |
|
Post subject:
Posted: Mar 27, 2005 - 10:34 PM
|
|
Joined: Feb 18, 2005
Canada
Posts: 424
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
|
|
I've only played in 2 tournamnets. One was at a Convention, one was in a store.
I found the convention to be a little better, but not by much. While the tournament pretty much kept me from doing anything else at the Con, I probably wouldn't have gone to it if it weren't for the tourney. Also, in the breaks, it was nice to be able to wander and see what else was going on.
The store pretty much left you sitting around waiting for the next round to start. The store was also a little more crowded than the Convention tourney, but I'm sure if you had a big enough store you could get around this.
Finally, the Store had a cheeper entry fee, and it was located about 10 minutes from my hosue (rather than a 60 minute subway/bus/taxi ride)
All in all, I guess I'm on the fence, but forced to choose, it would probably be the con tourneys. Its close though, I guess I just like playing Blood Bowl and I don't really care for the venue.
(Although, these tourneys in Pubs that I hear about in Europe really sound interesting) |
|
|
|
|
|
|