NAF World Headquarters

NAF World Cup - World Cup II?

mrschutte - Jan 18, 2009 - 04:38 PM
Post subject: World Cup II?
Will there be a 2nd World Cup competition? If so, when and where- this is especailly important for those of us who might "jump the pond" to be a part of it.

RMS.
Doubleskulls - Jan 19, 2009 - 03:07 AM
Post subject: RE: World Cup II?
I think the intention was every 4 years - so 2011 would be the next one.

Travelling even further I'd really really like it if the country and month could be finalised at least a year in advance. I know some other aussies would really like 2 years notice.
Rodders - Jan 20, 2009 - 06:26 AM
Post subject: RE: World Cup II?
surely it should be france this time, however is warhammer world more feasable??
Doubleskulls - Jan 20, 2009 - 06:59 PM
Post subject: RE: World Cup II?
My understanding is that hosting doesn't necessarily go with winning. I think the decision will be down to the president of the day.
SBG - Jan 29, 2009 - 10:28 AM
Post subject: RE: World Cup II?
Knowing a year in advance would be marvelous! I'm planning on attending this one!

Fred
Spazzfist - Jan 29, 2009 - 10:56 AM
Post subject: Re: RE: World Cup II?
      SBG wrote:
Knowing a year in advance would be marvelous! I'm planning on attending this one!

Fred


Yeah, yeah, sure Fred..... just like you were planning on attending the CCKO! I could have used the win you know! Wink
SBG - Jan 29, 2009 - 04:50 PM
Post subject: Re: RE: World Cup II?
      Spazzfist wrote:
      SBG wrote:
Knowing a year in advance would be marvelous! I'm planning on attending this one!

Fred


Yeah, yeah, sure Fred..... just like you were planning on attending the CCKO! I could have used the win you know! Wink


Lol Spazz!

I'm really sorry for your non win games! But smetime, duty has to come first! But it'll pay my fees to other tourneys, and I'll let yo beat me!

Fred
Doubleskulls - Jan 29, 2009 - 10:32 PM
Post subject: RE: Re: RE: World Cup II?
Actually I'd really like to know about 2 years in advance Smile Its a big trip bringing the whole family over for a couple of weeks - so being able to start planning with confidence well before would be good. I know other Aussies are in the same boat.
SolarFlare - Jan 30, 2009 - 06:33 AM
Post subject: Re: RE: Re: RE: World Cup II?
      Doubleskulls wrote:
I know other Aussies are in the same boat.


Yeah. You'll need extra time if you're coming by boat... Razz
Lycos - Jan 30, 2009 - 08:14 AM
Post subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: World Cup II?
With regards to the next cup, as I said to Doubleskulls on email the other day,..

With the Global recession and other hard times about, we think it would be a tough ask for a World Cup to happen in the next 18 months. At this point the objective is host again about 2011 and OMM and I breifly discussed this in our last phone call. I agree we need to give all concerned about two years notice but - in my opinion - that would be down to the elected President and that will happen this late spring. Announcements on that will follow soon, just getting other stuff done atm
DarkOrk20 - Feb 09, 2009 - 05:52 AM
Post subject:
I think a 2 year notice would be nice also. A larger venue may be needed. I know a few more Americans are planning on attending this next time also. I think the scope of it last time has generated a lot more interest for the next go around.

I was thought the intent was the winning country was hosting the next world cup. I would love to go to France, I hear the food there is the best. I am also intending to take some language lessons where ever it is next.

I have already started saving for it so I will have a little more spending money.
Darkson - Feb 09, 2009 - 08:17 AM
Post subject:
      DarkOrk20 wrote:
I am also intending to take some language lessons where ever it is next.


Is that after none of us English could understand you last time round? Wink
Xtreme - Feb 17, 2009 - 08:06 AM
Post subject:
      Darkson wrote:
      DarkOrk20 wrote:
I am also intending to take some language lessons where ever it is next.


Is that after none of us English could understand you last time round? Wink

A lot of the Americans wish they couldn't understand him sometimes. Wink
Lycos - Feb 17, 2009 - 10:16 AM
Post subject:
      DarkOrk20 wrote:
I was thought the intent was the winning country was hosting the next world cup. I would love to go to France, I hear the food there is the best.


That was never agreed to be the format. It is how Eurobowl works so I can see how some may get that Idea.. but that was never the idea behind the World Cup.

But yes, I have been to France some 20+ times (for 13 consecutive years, one week to play golf) and the food is indeed wonderful.
Old_Man_Monkey - Sep 14, 2009 - 02:26 PM
Post subject:
Stay tuned here for more information in the upcoming weeks....
DarkOrk20 - Sep 23, 2009 - 06:28 AM
Post subject:
SWEET
Thomsy - Oct 05, 2009 - 02:09 AM
Post subject:
I've already been saving up for this. Hopefully we'll be able to get more than six players over this time.
Joemanji - Oct 05, 2009 - 02:14 PM
Post subject:
      Old_Man_Monkey wrote:
Stay tuned here for more information in the upcoming weeks....
Yes.......??? Very Happy

You have 9 days before it is a month since you said this - in which case you should have said "in the upcoming months" - in which case this is a clear case of misrepresentation / teasing. Wink Razz

Joe
Rabid_Bogscum - Oct 06, 2009 - 07:29 PM
Post subject:
Im assuming we are waiting on the election being finalised.. no need to nitpick Smile
longfang - Oct 07, 2009 - 11:49 AM
Post subject:
Ahh but OMM might mean a NAF month!
dwarfcoach - Oct 11, 2009 - 04:31 PM
Post subject:
I'm very eager to hear an update myself although I know it will most likely be after the election now...
Old_Man_Monkey - Oct 12, 2009 - 05:41 PM
Post subject:
Yes, joking or not, you've hit it - waiting (rather patiently for me, I must say) for the electioins to be completed. I still expect to be able to give those attending at least 20 months to get things together so please bear with...
It would be interesting in the meantime to hear how the membership felt about holding NAF WC2 at WHW in Nottingham again, or at another site... I know I am on record as wanting to hold the World Champioinships in another place besides GW HQ, but what do you think?
Thomsy - Oct 12, 2009 - 10:16 PM
Post subject:
Do you think that you'll get more players for the next one?
If so space could be a problem.
Darkson - Oct 13, 2009 - 02:19 AM
Post subject:
Jim, you've got a PM.
Rodders - Oct 13, 2009 - 04:03 AM
Post subject:
would be nice to be held elswhere in teh world but i know the majority of players over the globe see wh world as the mecca of their gaming, size is the issue there as last time we had to hire out the pub down the road (affectionatly nick named chumpton) maybe we should just have a massive warehouse somewhere Wink
Grumbledook - Oct 13, 2009 - 06:36 AM
Post subject:
Vegas gets my vote

lots of hotels and convention centres, and loads of other stuff to do there
Gus - Oct 14, 2009 - 04:56 AM
Post subject:
On the off chance I can actually afford to attend I'd like somewhere I haven't been before. Given the goegraphic dispersion of players I'd suggest Europe would be best, so with those criteria in mind I'd vote for somewhere in Spain.
nyarlathotep - Oct 14, 2009 - 04:10 PM
Post subject:
Ok, the vote is over, spill the beans, Jim! Very Happy
Doubleskulls - Oct 15, 2009 - 02:11 AM
Post subject:
My preference is for the UK or Western Europe over Vegas, but that's personal. If its not in Europe Vegas is the best place IMO.
Babs - Oct 16, 2009 - 01:58 AM
Post subject:
I too would prefer Europe if I'm going to spend my hard earned cash *cough Feudball profits* to get there and back, over Vegas.

I'm not fussed if it is at Nottingham personally, seeing I've never been there.
Pipey - Oct 29, 2009 - 02:56 PM
Post subject:
I know it was never agreed that it would be held by the country of the winning team, but France would be a good location, n'est-ce pas?

Certainly a nation were the Blood Bowl tournament scene is thriving and popular would be good, to guarantee a good attendance. I think Spain, France and the UK would be great examples.

If it was held somewhere like Las Vegas, I doubt whether nearly 300 coaches would attend like last time. Correct me if I'm wrong...
Darkson - Oct 29, 2009 - 03:01 PM
Post subject:
I'd have trouble getting the ok for a trip to europe (damn the ball & chain), let alone Vegas!
Marco_Gianni - Nov 01, 2009 - 10:41 PM
Post subject:
I'd like to know when the location decision will be taken... IMO the Warhammer World is the best place for this event but if some want to do it in France and if we got time we surely could find a nice place too.
Hudson - Nov 02, 2009 - 03:14 AM
Post subject:
A nice alpine resort would be great for me, still got to go on a proper honeymoon and i think i could put the wife off till 2011.
Mepmuff - Nov 02, 2009 - 08:04 AM
Post subject:
      Hudson wrote:
A nice alpine resort would be great for me, still got to go on a proper hineymoon and i think i could put the wife off till 2011.


Laughing Laughing Laughing

Dag.... ow I've got coffee all over y eyoard!!!
jelmer - Nov 04, 2009 - 04:06 AM
Post subject:
Vegas would be great!
Pelle - Nov 04, 2009 - 05:58 AM
Post subject:
Not in Nottingham please...
magictobe - Nov 04, 2009 - 08:45 AM
Post subject:
      Pelle wrote:
Not in Nottingham please...


I want it in Nottingham. And we all wear protest shirts and in the end we burn the place. Evil or Very Mad

No serious, indeed not in Nottingham. They had their chance. We as bloodbowl community have shown at world cup I that their is a huge fan base and what do they do to us ... Unbelievable.
MattWhile - Nov 04, 2009 - 11:47 AM
Post subject:
      Pelle wrote:
Not in Nottingham please...


Agreed.
Darkson - Nov 04, 2009 - 04:14 PM
Post subject:
      MattWhile wrote:
      Pelle wrote:
Not in Nottingham please...


Agreed.


Agreed x2.


However, Venemous Breath mentioned a place (in Leicester?).
Pug - Nov 04, 2009 - 04:31 PM
Post subject:
Oh Leicester! Yes please! My town Very Happy

To accomadate 250 people...so 125 tables....hmmmm....

"Star Dust" near Coalville (15miles west of Leicester..bit remote...

One of the two Uni's, De Montfort or Leicester Uni........

MAybe the "Walkers Stadium" they have large conference facilities.....
daloonieshaman - Nov 04, 2009 - 06:02 PM
Post subject:
In the US/Canada Chicago is rather middle-ish and with a 4 year notice get 100-150ish coaches from US/Canada easy. As far and the one coming up you could not get enough Europeans and British to travel that quickly.
Logistically France is almost central. Personally I would prefer Spain and the Plane cost for the Brits should be rather the same as to France.
Gaming Location:
Whatever is free and near some affordable food. Not too far from a Major airport (reasonable walking distance from the hotels) unless some locals are willing to run pickups
SBG - Nov 04, 2009 - 08:31 PM
Post subject:
Is the Stade de France free for a week-end in 2011? Wink

Again, even though there are some doubters about my presence, I'd go if I know in advance!

Fred
Mepmuff - Nov 11, 2009 - 03:20 AM
Post subject:
So, the election is done and the biggest shockwave from GW legal seems to have been dealt with.

Any chance of an update?
Alkaline13 - Nov 11, 2009 - 04:03 AM
Post subject:
When in 2011 would this tourney be? This would be awesome to attend!

WH World would be nice to go to.. but I understand if people aren't thrilled to play there if they do normally.

Vegas would be cool as well, although playing near Chicago is always a good time!
Kithor - Nov 11, 2009 - 06:08 AM
Post subject:
Would be really cool to see another WC event in Europe Smile

Paris would be nice or in the London area. Very Happy

The place should be easily reachable by public transport......
Rodders - Nov 11, 2009 - 10:13 AM
Post subject:
after giving this some serrious thoght i think new york would be a good shout plenty of majpr airports and good local ones too good transport links lots of places to stay and central enough in the world for coaches from all corners of the globe.
Alkaline13 - Nov 11, 2009 - 09:16 PM
Post subject:
This has been in the works for a while right?
Hudson - Nov 12, 2009 - 01:38 AM
Post subject:
How about Cornwall?
Beautiful countryside, stunning beaches, Loads of bars, Direct rail link london and Newquay International airport (Well it might fly at sometimes in the year to one airport in France & one in Spain but it has direct flights from London.)
Very Happy Very Happy Very Happy Very Happy Very Happy Very Happy
Darkson - Nov 12, 2009 - 03:48 PM
Post subject:
In October/November?
Aramil - Nov 12, 2009 - 05:56 PM
Post subject:
Please, not again in Nottingham. Warhammer World is really nice to see, the Bugman Pub is really nice to see... the first time. Then you notice that everyting is really expensive, in order to reach the place you have to rent cars, the nearest international airport is too far and also we had to split people, with some groups that had to walk from WH World to the Pub and viceversa twice a day!

I'm not against any country and I really like to see all the British friends... but let's change venue!

A bigger place is possible to find... and possibly in a city easier to reach. Wink

Hudson - Nov 13, 2009 - 12:57 AM
Post subject:
      Darkson wrote:
In October/November?


Well the bars are still there Very Happy
sann0638 - Nov 13, 2009 - 03:16 AM
Post subject:
Earl's Court!
JoeKano - Nov 13, 2009 - 08:05 AM
Post subject:
Melbourne Australia!!!!! Lots of great pubs and bars and clubs and Restaurants. Sure the AMerican Networks wont like having to cover that time zone but hey screw em after they fubared the Olympic Swimming in Beijing anyway. ... hang on this isnt the IOC thread....
Pipey - Nov 14, 2009 - 01:37 PM
Post subject:
I hear what you're saying, Aramil.

Also, with the NAF's English or English-speaking presidential history, I think it would be a great gesture to hold the tournament in a non-English-speaking country. This would better reflect the international BB community that the NAF represents. Another NWC in the UK might make practical sense, but wouldn’t it perpetuate the idea of an Anglo-centric NAF?

Just my opinion though.

To those who are involved with organising the tourney, are these things currently under discussion and if so what are options are being discussed?
juergen - Nov 14, 2009 - 02:41 PM
Post subject:
i don't mind having it in the UK, but please not in Nottingham (nothing to do with GW, but with the journey to get there)
JoeKano - Nov 15, 2009 - 05:00 AM
Post subject:
Well Ive got a 2011 european holiday awaiting booking on this!!! Need a date and place so can get planning! Some firm information peoples!
Hudson - Dec 03, 2009 - 01:33 AM
Post subject:
I hear Ireland have asked for a place as they failed to get an extra place in the 2010 World Cup. Very Happy
Doubleskulls - Dec 03, 2009 - 04:34 AM
Post subject:
LOL
Sebco - Dec 06, 2009 - 11:20 AM
Post subject:
      Hudson wrote:
I hear Ireland have asked for a place as they failed to get an extra place in the 2010 World Cup. Very Happy


I also hear we (french bloodbowlers) will have to play our hands tied behind our backs... but we will come anyway ! (I started training to move my miniatures with my mouth and rolling my dices with my toes) Laughing
Doubleskulls - Dec 06, 2009 - 09:17 PM
Post subject:
I thought the french team just started with sure hands instead Wink
ManticoreRich - Dec 10, 2009 - 08:45 AM
Post subject:
No news?
Lycos - Dec 15, 2009 - 08:27 AM
Post subject:
I am hoping to make contact with OMM this week. I know he has been working on this but I also know it is very busy for him at the moment. I agree that we need to get this moving so I will find out from the team what the latest is.
Old_Man_Monkey - Dec 16, 2009 - 06:21 AM
Post subject:
Please see preliminary news in the 'Announcement' section of this topic.
OMM

ps Dave - you may want to begin a separate thread somewhere....
Taxal - Dec 16, 2009 - 05:20 PM
Post subject:
I am so going to get a Canadian team together for this one. Any takers from the great white north..eh?
Notorious_jtb - Dec 16, 2009 - 06:51 PM
Post subject:
      Taxal wrote:
I am so going to get a Canadian team together for this one. Any takers from the great white north..eh?


I am keen.
Hopefully I will have at least written the citizenship test by the cup................................
Hudson - Dec 17, 2009 - 06:40 AM
Post subject:
Right so going on Old Man Monkeys post it's venue, food, accommadation, transport and a good time

Team Newquay bid

Venue:- we might have a venue we can get that would be big enough

Food:- Food avalible on site, a very good standard so that should be covered

Accommadation:- Plenty of hotels in the area, one just over the raod from possible venue.

A good time:- Hello Newquay need we say more

Transport:- Well ok, not great, on train line and one main road but we have Newquay international airport. Well ok it might fly to France and Spain a bit in the summer.

lol Very Happy
sann0638 - Dec 17, 2009 - 10:30 AM
Post subject:
      Hudson wrote:
Team Newquay bid


Nice one Gary - just needs Lord Coe on board!
Pako - Jan 25, 2010 - 06:43 AM
Post subject:
Hello,

Maybe it was already asked, but considering that almost 300 people join the first edition, and I guess we expect a lot more for the second one... is there any consideration to give priority to the teams that joined the first World Cup edition? Or all we just should to be aware to inscribe?

On the other hand, I expect that French people want to organize the event. I think they should have the chance to take this responsability due to their winning on 1st NAF WC. Moreover they have a number of well tournament organizers and well know players.
Doubleskulls - Jan 25, 2010 - 04:33 PM
Post subject:
This isn't Eurovision... the winner does not get to host the next one. As per OMMs post France is in the running and I expect is a leading contender.
Deathwing - Jan 25, 2010 - 06:03 PM
Post subject:
      Doubleskulls wrote:
This isn't Eurovision... the winner does not get to host the next one. As per OMMs post France is in the running and I expect is a leading contender.


An early executive decision was taken after rumours of a talented team from the Falkland Islands last time! Razz

In all seriousness, it's all about capability of hosting the world's largest and premier blood bowl tournament and making it a great experience for all who attend. That doesn't necessarily equate with coaching ability of a particular team from a particular country in the previous WC.
I too expect France to put forward a strong bid, but that is not related the winner last time.

I'll be there wherever it is, relaxing as a player this time around. Smile

Oh and Ian, did you mean Eurobowl? Razz
Pako - Jan 26, 2010 - 07:45 AM
Post subject:
I know that guys, is just that it seems to me that if there's finally a tie between two, will be more pollite to give the French people the chance.

That's it.

Anything about the WC teams that play the 1st edition? Is just because I'm not following so close topics about WC and I want to know if someone is going to warn me to inscribe, or I should check the forum every day till 2011 Wink
Valen - Mar 03, 2010 - 03:42 AM
Post subject:
Any more news yet?
Old_Man_Monkey - Mar 07, 2010 - 06:55 AM
Post subject:
Thanks, Gav, for the question - here hopefully are some answers:

1. to date, I have received three serious bids: two from France, one from Italy
2. I have asked the following NAF members to be part of the evaluation group: LouisX, Longshot, Aramil, Panico, Dutch Dave, and Norse. There will be at least two others added to the group, which also includes our President Lycos and Treasurer-elect Geggster.
3. It could be possible to have an 'early' signing on period for those teams which attended the first WC - there would have to be a stipulation that at least four/five of the original six members are part of the group, but it may be possible.
4. I look to make the choice still at the end of March but should an added week or two become needed, I ask for your patience.

That's it for now - more soon!
OMM
Podfrey - Apr 19, 2010 - 01:57 PM
Post subject:
      Old_Man_Monkey wrote:
4. I look to make the choice still at the end of March but should an added week or two become needed, I ask for your patience.

That's it for now - more soon!
OMM


Hi OMM,

Hope everything is OK that side of the pond. Just wondering if there was any news?

Cheers,

G
Nicodaz - Jun 03, 2010 - 03:02 AM
Post subject:
Hi guys,
In order to receive the World Cup 2 - NAF2011, France proposed 2 different sites.
Earlier, OMM said that a choice should be made at the end of March 2010.
Until now, no decision have been taken and we stay without any news from the NAF staff.

We would like to know what to expect in order to establish our planning for 2011.
If you have any trouble taking the decision, maybe you need more information ? In this case, we are both available to serve you.

cheers,
Talkarde and d@z
Lycos - Jun 03, 2010 - 09:42 AM
Post subject:
I will mail and call OMM again. I left a message a week back but he can be away from home.
Babs - Jun 12, 2010 - 05:15 PM
Post subject:
We really need some people to show that the NAF has this in hand. We asked for 18 months of notice, now we don't have that. We don't see much in the way of organisation or planning occurring when we were told we would know back in March and have had almost nothing in the way of updates on this front.

If we're not careful people (myself included) won't be confident in the world cup to come (as it costs some of use literally thousands of dollars each just to get there and back, let alone transport, accomodation, Long service leave from work, etc.)

In short, for some of use to get there it's a HUGE deal. We need to see someone move on this, ASAP. (I do recall we had similar problems with the first one until someone stepped in).
SBG - Jun 12, 2010 - 05:48 PM
Post subject:
Agree with Babs here: for me to attend means between 2 and 3 K $. I can't afford that on a short notice.

Fred
GalakStarscraper - Jun 18, 2010 - 11:18 AM
Post subject:
Seriously ... its really simple to me. Communication is a wonderful thing. If OMM cannot communicate on a weekly basis on this event than it falls to the President, Vice President or Tournament Director to make sure a WEEKLY update is made. As Babs said this is a big deal if you want folks to come in from the USA and OZ and Canada ... you cannot do this stuff again to everyone like happened last time.

Galak
SierraKiloBravo - Jun 19, 2010 - 12:14 AM
Post subject:
Seems pretty simple to me. If you need 18 months' notice and you don't get it, you don't go. I'd be real hesitant to plan an international vacation on spotty info.
sann0638 - Jun 25, 2010 - 11:57 AM
Post subject:
Drums fingers on table, whistles.
Shaniepoo1 - Jun 27, 2010 - 11:06 AM
Post subject:
Due to no real info im unable to go as i have used most of my annual leave up now and wownt be able to get the time off. The way things are looking i cant see the World cup 2 being all that big of an event. IMO it would have been better staying in the same location as last year, would have saved alot of trouble.
Colin - Jun 27, 2010 - 11:46 AM
Post subject:
If there's a problem getting things organised, why have it this year? Why not have it next year (or even the next) to give time to work out all the details?
Lycos - Jun 27, 2010 - 03:20 PM
Post subject:
Hi All, an update for you.

The event is scheduled for next Autumn as agreed and it will be in Europe as previously said. At this point there are a couple of points just to quickly say:

We have a few bids in and in order to get it right, one or more bids needs to update us on a couple of things. Nothing big, but none the less, we need to be clear.

Also, we have restructed the committee for this and OMM will not be leading the project. I will announce the changes to that shortly.

I understand that some will be travelling a very long way but I can confirm you will need to save Euro's and it is Oct/Nov 2011. Exact dates of course depend on the bid agreed on. This needs to be wrapped up sharpish in my opinion, I agree with comments above.
Jokaero - Jun 28, 2010 - 03:05 AM
Post subject:
Is there a list with all the bids?

My favourite one is still Warhammer World. I can't really think of a better and more suiting location. I personally don't think we have to stick to restricting rules like changing continents or do it in the winning team's country. WC I was such a great event and I'm sure that seeing Warhammer World was another reason to travel big distances. This you won't have in other locations. For similar reasons my 2nd favourite location would be Vegas. As we're all nerdy game addicts, Vegas' charm would also attract many European coaches to fly over there.
Of course this all depends on whether there are local organisers taking charge of it
Darkson - Jun 28, 2010 - 05:18 AM
Post subject:
There were disadvantages to Warhammer World, the biggest being that we couldn't fit all the attendees in on hall, meaning some (8 or 10) teams per round had to play at a local pub. Now, I'm sure those at the pub didn't mind the location (I didn't mind refereeing there all weekend Wink ), but it did make the between-round socialising a bit difficult, as many didn't want to make the 10 minute-each-way walk in the gap between rounds.

Personally, from a personal financial perspective, I'd prefer it to be in the UK again, but I'd rather have it in a place where all the coaches can be together (UK or not), rather than in different locations.
nyarlathotep - Jun 28, 2010 - 01:54 PM
Post subject:
Vegas would be my preferred location, but I'm saving for it no matter where it is. Hope we can get some further direction on this soon.
Lycos - Jun 28, 2010 - 03:39 PM
Post subject:
Yeah, seriously, very soon I hope. I am very cautious about making big grand statements on this thread as it has to be clear and precise information.

Vegas was a talking point but no bid came from the USA in any form. I have been to Vegas myself and loved the place so even I hope one day that could be on!
Darkson is also correct about Warhammer World. It is a great venue but players can always go there for the GT each year. We just cannot hold enough players there for the World Cup.
nyarlathotep - Jul 21, 2010 - 12:09 PM
Post subject:
<looks at a non-existent watch>

<taps foot>

<listens to the crickets>

<leaves>
Lycos - Jul 21, 2010 - 04:41 PM
Post subject:
Your timing is pretty good Nyarlathotep!! I spent two hours on the phone to committee last night and I said I would update the thread tonight! (just too tired last night)

So here is the up to date situation: We have 3 bids all with different features and attractions. I/We have selected a panel of 18 (it was 12, 6 more are about to be asked) coaches from all over the globe. Most of the 18 are not European. We will give these 18 a breakdown of the bids and ask them to vote. A clear winner will selected. In case of a tie, I will have a casting vote.

For clarity, no coach from one of the countries putting forward a bid will have a vote. The only committee members to vote will be the TD and the FD, for obvious reasons. I only vote if tied.

This process will not take long, I am about to send the 6 extra invites and I am waiting to hear on a couple back of the first 12.
As we we have said, there are no flights to book yet and we have agreed on mainland Europe.
nyarlathotep - Jul 23, 2010 - 01:19 PM
Post subject:
Awesome, thanks for the update.

I will begin to get my papers in order, then.
Lycos - Aug 12, 2010 - 03:32 PM
Post subject:
Further update: The decision process for the venue is on track as per previous statements. We are expecting to make the announcement at the end of this month. I am just waiting for the last of the 18 to confirm and then I will release the documentation to them.

At the end of the month, I shall probably lock a number of old threads and start some new ones so everyone knows where the information is and also where we know to look for new questions from the members. I think that is cleaner and easier, I hope you agree.
Babs - Aug 15, 2010 - 05:32 AM
Post subject:
Yes, and thanks for the update.
mrschutte - Aug 30, 2010 - 09:18 AM
Post subject: World Cup 2
      Lycos wrote:
Further update: The decision process for the venue is on track as per previous statements. We are expecting to make the announcement at the end of this month. I am just waiting for the last of the 18 to confirm and then I will release the documentation to them.

At the end of the month, I shall probably lock a number of old threads and start some new ones so everyone knows where the information is and also where we know to look for new questions from the members. I think that is cleaner and easier, I hope you agree.


We are 2 days from the end of the month and just over a year away from the anticipated dates of the tourney... any word yet? I, like many others I suspect, we need as much advance notice to make arrangements as possible. Scheduling time off, arranging passports, hotels, etc. Can we at least get the tentative dates so I can start trying to make sure they are clear on my calendar?
Geggster - Aug 30, 2010 - 11:03 AM
Post subject: RE: World Cup 2
Hold fire, mrschutte. Hold fire. An announcement is imminent.
Lycos - Aug 30, 2010 - 04:44 PM
Post subject: RE: World Cup 2
Indeed it is.

And now I can announce that the World Cup 2011 will be held in Amsterdam, Netherlands.

You will please understand that the team hosting will need some time to prepare to answer many more questions, so more to follow.

I expect that we will lock old threads and start a new one officially.
Dave
Colin - Aug 30, 2010 - 05:46 PM
Post subject: RE: World Cup 2
Amsterdam!!! Yes!!!!

Depending on the exact date, I will definatly try to make this one. I have to book my holidays for the rest of the year (2011) in January, so hopefully we will know the date before then.
Doubleskulls - Aug 31, 2010 - 12:00 AM
Post subject: RE: World Cup 2
Dates! Dates! Dates! People need the dates more than the location so they can book leave!
Nicodaz - Aug 31, 2010 - 12:48 AM
Post subject: RE: World Cup 2
Very good news guys!
The location is ideal for international flights.

Waiting for dates, we will be back to share this pleasure again with you.
juergen - Aug 31, 2010 - 01:20 AM
Post subject: RE: World Cup 2
great news, great location for booking flights - WELL DONE !!!
Pako - Aug 31, 2010 - 01:45 AM
Post subject: RE: World Cup 2
COOL!!!

I'm trying to go to Dutchbowl a number of times. Finally, I will have my tourney in Netherlands!

Very Happy
Pako - Aug 31, 2010 - 01:48 AM
Post subject:
      Old_Man_Monkey wrote:

3. It could be possible to have an 'early' signing on period for those teams which attended the first WC - there would have to be a stipulation that at least four/five of the original six members are part of the group, but it may be possible.

That's it for now - more soon!
OMM


Here we are, OMM! Wink
Valen - Aug 31, 2010 - 03:52 AM
Post subject:
Do we know when the dates will be fixed or at least a ball park date?
Talkarde - Aug 31, 2010 - 03:56 AM
Post subject:
Amsterdam is a great choice (myfirst tourney was there) !
I'll be there for sure.
Bucks - Aug 31, 2010 - 05:37 AM
Post subject:
Nice !! Smile
Dave - Aug 31, 2010 - 10:02 AM
Post subject:
Hi all,

as part of the organizing comittee (together with Lucy, Niels and probabely a few more) I can say we're excited to get this thing over here .. BloodBowl's Coming Home!!

I'll have to do a few things tonight but after that I'll open up a thread where questions and the like can be asked.

Be adviced that we're very much aware (and feel the pressure) of giving dates ASAP. We will, as soon as we're reasonably possible.

CU Later!
Joemanji - Aug 31, 2010 - 10:53 AM
Post subject:
YEEAAAHHHHH!! Very Happy
Sebco - Aug 31, 2010 - 12:06 PM
Post subject:
We're now waiting for dates. But I can say yet I will attend this second World Cup. First World Cup was great, I also liked my only Dutch Open, I will come back to Amsterdam for Blood Bowl ! Very Happy
Deathwing - Aug 31, 2010 - 12:53 PM
Post subject:
Having had the honour of being one of the 18 asked to vote, I'd like to say that I thought all three bids were very strong, and I'm sure I wasn't the only one who found it a very tough choice indeed. Whilst my vote will remain confidential, I'm convinced any of the three potentials would have provided a great WC, so I'd like to offer both my congratulations to Amsterdam and commiserations to the other bids at the same time. At this point I have no idea of either the identity of the other 17 individuals or how the voting went. My gut says it must have been close, so a personal thanks to the losing bidders for the obvious work involved, it really was three excellent options on the table.

-Woody
Lizardcore - Aug 31, 2010 - 01:22 PM
Post subject:
This world cup will be interesting. After testing the beer-handling capacity of coaches, this time we'll be testing weed resistance !

Good for France again, We can only lose if sober Very Happy

btw, 110 replies on the NAF forum in 1 day, that's pretty cool !
Marco_Gianni - Aug 31, 2010 - 03:33 PM
Post subject:
Very good choice indeed. For sure I'll be there... we'll be there.

good pressure Dave hey ? Wink
Hachidan - Aug 31, 2010 - 04:21 PM
Post subject:
Yippeee!
Darkson - Aug 31, 2010 - 04:26 PM
Post subject:
As I said on TFF, got permission from the better half to attend.

I'll drop the part that it's in Amsterdam in a bit later. Wink

Looks like I'll be trying to join a team this time round though.
millandson - Aug 31, 2010 - 08:39 PM
Post subject:
Sweet! My fiancee's grandparents live in Amsterdam, so I might even be able to make a holiday of it depending on the dates, and stay at their place if I can make it Very Happy

Are there any rules on who can attend? Like do you have to have done well at another tournament, or can anyone who pays turn up?
Dave - Aug 31, 2010 - 11:44 PM
Post subject:
2 rules, You must like Bloodbowl, you must want beer. Wink

seriously, we don't know yet but knowing lucy it'll be a 'free for all' tournie
Maitre_tactac - Sep 01, 2010 - 02:23 AM
Post subject:
That's a great news
Just for the information, is it possible to know where the two (?) other choices where?

I will definitely want to go to WC II and hope that places won't be as limited as in the previous one Smile
Pipey - Sep 01, 2010 - 04:07 AM
Post subject:
As Tournament Director, I also had a vote (and also did not know who the other voting members were). However I am aware they were a representative set of coaches from all around the world.

It was indeed a very tough choice between the three bids - Modena (Italy), Anglet (France) and Amsterdam (Netherlands).

Congratulations to Amsterdam! Thank you very much and commiserations to the other bids.
Colin - Sep 01, 2010 - 07:18 PM
Post subject:
I will definately try to make this one. Doubt there will be a team Canada, but if there's a team Commonwealth that needs an extra person, then count me in.
Notorious_jtb - Sep 01, 2010 - 09:39 PM
Post subject:
      Colin wrote:
I will definately try to make this one. Doubt there will be a team Canada, but if there's a team Commonwealth that needs an extra person, then count me in.


Don't count team Canada out so quickly. The chaps and chapesses on the tournament circuit in Ontario and Quebec are very keen.

Amsterdam is as good a destination as any in Europe for us so it is a helpful choice.

I have just scaled back my involvment in the three Ottawa tournaments due to new baby. Once the dust clears I should have some time available to head up the organisation of a "Team Canada". That and I became Canadian on August 12th so very motivated to represent Smile
Colin - Sep 02, 2010 - 08:18 AM
Post subject:
Good to hear.
mrschutte - Sep 03, 2010 - 01:31 PM
Post subject: Dates
Not to put undue pressure on, but dates will now make or break my ability to attend.
Dave - Sep 03, 2010 - 01:40 PM
Post subject: RE: Dates
we're doing all we can
SumBloke - Sep 03, 2010 - 06:47 PM
Post subject: RE: Dates
I just hope it's not the same weekend as Spiel
Dave - Sep 04, 2010 - 12:50 AM
Post subject: RE: Dates
when's spiel
Frank - Sep 04, 2010 - 07:36 PM
Post subject: Re: RE: Dates
      Dave wrote:
when's spiel

20.10.2011 - 23.10.2011
Taxal - Sep 05, 2010 - 11:03 AM
Post subject: RE: Re: RE: Dates
Oh yeah!!!!!!!!!

With my girlfriends family all in Amsterdam that will be amazing on the wallet. Waiting for the date and will take it from there.

Any Canadians looking at making a team?
Notorious_jtb - Sep 05, 2010 - 04:10 PM
Post subject: Re: RE: Re: RE: Dates
      Taxal wrote:
Oh yeah!!!!!!!!!

With my girlfriends family all in Amsterdam that will be amazing on the wallet. Waiting for the date and will take it from there.

Any Canadians looking at making a team?


yep

      Notorious_jtb wrote:
      Colin wrote:
I will definately try to make this one. Doubt there will be a team Canada, but if there's a team Commonwealth that needs an extra person, then count me in.


Don't count team Canada out so quickly. The chaps and chapesses on the tournament circuit in Ontario and Quebec are very keen.

Amsterdam is as good a destination as any in Europe for us so it is a helpful choice.

I have just scaled back my involvment in the three Ottawa tournaments due to new baby. Once the dust clears I should have some time available to head up the organisation of a "Team Canada". That and I became Canadian on August 12th so very motivated to represent Smile

Colin - Sep 06, 2010 - 10:31 AM
Post subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Dates
Maybe we should start an new thread somewhere to organise a NAF WC Team Canada. Would be able to see how many people are interested, etc.
Notorious_jtb - Sep 06, 2010 - 11:41 AM
Post subject: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Dates
      Colin wrote:
Maybe we should start an new thread somewhere to organise a NAF WC Team Canada. Would be able to see how many people are interested, etc.


Will do, I am waiting for the official WC II announcement to get sorted first and then ride that wave of enthusiasm and immediacy!
Xtreme - Sep 07, 2010 - 04:52 PM
Post subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Dates
If team canada wants a private forum on the Zlurpee forums I can set one up for you, that is where team USA will be discussing the trip.
Notorious_jtb - Sep 07, 2010 - 07:59 PM
Post subject: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Dates
      Xtreme wrote:
If team canada wants a private forum on the Zlurpee forums I can set one up for you, that is where team USA will be discussing the trip.


That is kind of you Xtreme. I will discuss it with some of the folks however, the Canadians are a pretty open bunch and we will happily trash talk each other in the public NAF boards.

Laughing
Norse - Sep 08, 2010 - 10:40 AM
Post subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Dates
if the dates work for me, I might just be able to don the Oranje one last time.. Smile
Dave - Sep 08, 2010 - 04:11 PM
Post subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Dates
http://www.talkfantasyfootball.org/viewtopic.php?f=41&t=31612&start=0

we're working on it!
beaso - Nov 01, 2010 - 04:38 PM
Post subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Dates
Not trying to be pedantic, but it's now the 2nd of November and once again things are late!!!!!

The longer things get delayed the harder it is for people not in Europe to attend this event which we are looking forward to attending.
JoeKano - Nov 01, 2010 - 04:47 PM
Post subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Dates
Aussies are already having issues cause frankly we needed twelve months to passport, visa , save fund raise etc and a fair few of us have employers who like twelve months notice for leave. We need the dates. NOW!!!!!
Jonny_P - Nov 01, 2010 - 07:13 PM
Post subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Dates
I am running the Chaos Cup in the USA. I need to know the World Cup dates soon as we need to schedule Chaos Cup around it.

And we'd like to schedule Chaos Cup within a week of Spike as well......so anything you can do to get us the date would be very helpful in our planning!

Thanks!
Dave - Nov 02, 2010 - 12:44 AM
Post subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Dates
we'll post details tonight
most probabely a date and the location and we'll get back with other details like price the 1st of december
beaso - Nov 02, 2010 - 06:28 AM
Post subject: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Dates
      Dave wrote:
we'll post details tonight
most probabely a date and the location and we'll get back with other details like price the 1st of december


I look forward with baited breath. As Joe says it is very hard for us Aussies or anybody south of the equator to organise this and we've been patient for some time now.

Actions speak louder than words.
Dave - Nov 02, 2010 - 08:35 AM
Post subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Dates
We are very much aware of that, it's just that we needed (and still need) time to sort everything out in the right way, I don't want a bankrupcy of any kind personally. We said November 1st, it'll be November 2nd, not that bad
Notorious_jtb - Nov 02, 2010 - 08:40 AM
Post subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Dates
Guys, this is a big event. When someone organises a tournament for 20-30 people they can loose some money, maybe 100-200 $ or Euros.

When some on runs an event for 400 people they can loose a lot lot more if they make mistakes.

Provided we hear soon it should be ok for most of us. It is hard to organise from Canada too (not as hard as from the South I completely understand).
beaso - Dec 08, 2010 - 02:43 AM
Post subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Dates
So when are we likely to find out the important things like Venue and cost?

I'm guessing it's likely to be New Year know?
Lycos - Dec 08, 2010 - 02:59 AM
Post subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Dates
Venue is fixed, it is a case of ironing out the tournament structure and there is document under review now that I believe the WC team want to post this week Beaso.

All we need to take at this stage is pre registration detail because the more there are the cheaper it is for all....
Lizardcore - Dec 15, 2010 - 03:51 PM
Post subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Dates
Not to be picky but it is written that there are 400 places, wchich represent 66.6 teams... i guess the right number is 68 teams (408 coaches) ? Just making sure that there is not an odd number of teams Very Happy
Lycos - Dec 15, 2010 - 04:24 PM
Post subject: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Dates
      Lizardcore wrote:
Not to be picky but it is written that there are 400 places, wchich represent 66.6 teams... i guess the right number is 68 teams (408 coaches) ? Just making sure that there is not an odd number of teams Very Happy


If you read Dave's posts, there are also some individual places allocated too. We also need to think about staff, coverage of last minute cancellations etc etc.
Flix - Dec 16, 2010 - 10:05 AM
Post subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Dates
      Quote:
Please note that as it’s the NAF World Cup the title can only be won by a team consisting of coaches that have the same nationality.



Question:

If a team register for a Nation all players have to be the same Nation ?

if not, 2 team want to register but one spot left get the clean nation get prefered?
Grumbledook - Dec 16, 2010 - 10:11 AM
Post subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Dates
pretty sure it said in dave's post that if your team isn't made up of players of the same nation then they aren't eligible to win the "world cup" for a country

they would just be the winning team but the world cup then I assume goes to the highest place team of full nationals

they also said first come first serve with regards to teams, though if your team isn't all the same nationality then you aren't taking up a country slot, so not sure what the situation there is...
Dave - Dec 16, 2010 - 10:52 AM
Post subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Dates
good question .. we'll adress it later tonight
Volstagg - Dec 16, 2010 - 12:50 PM
Post subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Dates
A fight started over in the spanish community to see who's going, so I decided that maybe to register individually would be a good option. Didn't attend last edition, so I don't know how it works as individual... any an idea? Thanks!
Dave - Dec 16, 2010 - 01:03 PM
Post subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Dates
When you're there as individual you'll probabely end up filling gaps that occur here and there, if that's not nessecary you'll form a team of yer own.
Grumbledook - Dec 16, 2010 - 01:49 PM
Post subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Dates
my 2p:

it is meant to be a world cup between nations and not just another team tournament of which there seem to be quite a few theses days

on that basis teams of whole nationals should get priority

if you are one member short and there is a lone person of your nation who wants to attend but doesn't have a team, do they get to not come at the expense of your team using a ringer?
Sebco - Dec 16, 2010 - 03:16 PM
Post subject: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Date
      Volstagg wrote:
A fight started over in the spanish community to see who's going, so I decided that maybe to register individually would be a good option. Didn't attend last edition, so I don't know how it works as individual... any an idea? Thanks!


Well, there isn't yet "fighting" on french forums but there's already a debate about how can we chose who is going and who isn't. Before today's announcement, we made a list of 17 complete teams of 6 players and 14 individuals without teams... there are 8 slots for french teams so it seems there will be dozens of individuals like you if it's possible for spanish (and french and italian and etc...) guys who are not in the slot teams to register individually.
Frikipe - Dec 17, 2010 - 06:36 AM
Post subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE:
Obviously not all the people talknig about attend will be there, whem you have to book the flight the hotel etc etc 10-20% desists, but still i think 400 is a low number of players for this World Cup maybe 500-600 will be fine, it's the general opinion here in Spain.
Volstagg - Dec 17, 2010 - 07:24 AM
Post subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE:
Next WC III should be in Alaska, no joke! I don't have any idea how many people are you there in the NAF Headquarters, but I guess that pushing it to 600 maybe too much for you... And I don't see the point to that. In a Worl Cup you just should have some of the best teams from every country, not 10.
Darkson - Dec 17, 2010 - 08:04 AM
Post subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE:
I'm sure the organisers would like to increase the numbers, but seeing as they have to work with whatever venue they're using, it makes it difficult.

I'm sure a UK bid that offered to use one of the NEC halls could easily host a WC with 1000 participants, but the cost whole be prohibited.
WC1 could have had many more players, but the venue din't permit it.

      Volstagg wrote:
In a Worl Cup you just should have some of the best teams from every country, not 10.

And who gets to decide who the "best" team is?
shuran - Dec 17, 2010 - 10:18 AM
Post subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE:
I dont know what was asked to the candidate but if it was to organize a tournament for 400, it was an error. It is supposed to be a feast for all the BB player not only for those that win the right to come by some random picking.
Volstagg - Dec 18, 2010 - 05:52 AM
Post subject: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re:
      Darkson wrote:
      Volstagg wrote:
In a Worl Cup you just should have some of the best teams from every country, not 10.

And who gets to decide who the "best" team is?


"Best" just meaning some kind of selection... I realise it's not at all easy, because the WC is the tourney that any one wants to play, and it's just the 2 edition! That means that last time was great and this time will be too.

      shuran wrote:
I dont know what was asked to the candidate but if it was to organize a tournament for 400, it was an error. It is supposed to be a feast for all the BB player not only for those that win the right to come by some random picking.


Would be great to have an open tourney with 800-900 players, but as I said it's just the 2 edition. The WC and the NAF is still growing, maybe not as fast as the community has grown last year, but still I think we have to be grateful first thing to Dave, Lucy & Co. And second thing, be supportive. Smile

As I said, I will try to attend as individuall, once there if you need me to help any how just say it. After all I just go there to meet some friends. Wink
PANDA - Dec 20, 2010 - 05:12 PM
Post subject:
Days,

At first, sorry about my english becose y don´t write/speak it from far away. And my direct translations spanish-english of the typicall spanish expresions.

May be posible if a country have all the teams slots full can get free slots than other countries don´t use?

My question is becose i like to me that in some countries have more teams than slots and this way of doing things is mading that the pre-registration of teams will to a south-saharians tea party. ( merienda de negros in spanish ).

A first solution to do will be to talk to Countrie naf headcuarters, to know how many teams have left and redistribute to the countries that demands some more.

A second one may be to pre-registrate the last worldcup teams to confirm they slot making these teams preference and asking for new participation, already done this, made new free slot teams for countrie.

The 3rt in discord may be to register all the teams that pay in registration order of payment. South-saharians tea party again.

Or the last one a strange mixture of the other 3...

Writed this, I like to know closer than later that becose the 22th of december at 14:00 a lot of people will be waiting to refresh the pre-registration page to pre-registrate his team before the others like sharks!!! Wink

Ask for me at naf worldcup II for garbanzos if I survive to the south-saharians tea party a get a team slot to travel to!!!

thanks for triyng to understant my awfull english and have fun if we don´t meet there!!!
Lucy - Dec 20, 2010 - 05:19 PM
Post subject:
We're discussing this.
We'll reply on time.

Lucy
Pako - Dec 21, 2010 - 04:06 AM
Post subject:
Crazy suggestion, maybe late.

What about 8 member teams? I will reduce number of teams, make it easy to register, equipare to Eurobowl numbers and also it makes people to have 2 teams maybe allow to join 1.

I think you will reduce 2-3 not-so-sure to register teams per country.
Grumbledook - Dec 21, 2010 - 04:46 AM
Post subject:
the cap is on the total number of individuals, so larger teams will just mean less teams but the same overall player cap
DeeTee - Dec 21, 2010 - 06:15 AM
Post subject:
      Grumbledook wrote:
the cap is on the total number of individuals, so larger teams will just mean less teams but the same overall player cap


+1, besides, it seems it's difficult enough to arrange for 6 people in a locality to get together let alone an extra 2!
Volstagg - Dec 21, 2010 - 06:50 AM
Post subject:
      Deetee wrote:
+1, besides, it seems it's difficult enough to arrange for 6 people in a locality to get together let alone an extra 2!


I think it's not a bad idea at all, the 8 players team. You reduce the number of teams ( it's easier for the organizers ) and it's eurobowl-like (wich gives some cohesion to the ideas of eurobowl and wordlcup).

Not sharing the same hotel room it's not a big problem as not beeing able to play the bigest Bloodbowl Tourney, to me.
Darth_Dreddolo - Dec 21, 2010 - 07:34 AM
Post subject:
I agree that increasing team members to 8 would reduce the number of team subscribed, this increasing the chances of being selected for the teams who really care about this tournament
Grumbledook - Dec 21, 2010 - 07:40 AM
Post subject:
no it wouldn't cause there would be room for less teams as well...

the idea is to get as many teams from as many places in as possible, so having to have more players on a team increaes the likelihood that it will exclude certain nations from creating a team

I would much rather we see teams from the countries that have to travel a long way or don't have as large a player pool of national players to create a team from, than to overload the tournament with teams from countries that live closest and have more players

it is the WORLD cup so trying to include as many teams from as many countries as possible is the way to go

increasing teams to 8 players doesn't make much difference with a random selection if your countries quota goes over, I may obviously be affected by this so not like I'm arguing in my own favour
beaso - Dec 21, 2010 - 05:10 PM
Post subject:
I also agree in regards to what has been said earlier by some.

Knowing where we are going to play and how much this puppy is going to cost us would be useful before all the shannigans is to occur before pre-registrations.

As people are as mentioned pre-register then go, ooh that's too much or some other excuse not letting anybody now this until the last minute and stuffing numbers up.

In my opinion you should only get signed up if you pay your entry fee or maybe there needs to be a team deposit with the understanding if you pull out you lose your deposit (team anyway or partial refund for individuals). This might stop any over eagerness.

Cheers
Boneless - Dec 22, 2010 - 01:32 AM
Post subject:
Im Hoping to take the First Team Wales to this event, I know its a club event but its the beginnings of what I hope will turn in to a Eurobowl team
Pako - Dec 22, 2010 - 02:17 AM
Post subject:
      Deetee wrote:
      Grumbledook wrote:
the cap is on the total number of individuals, so larger teams will just mean less teams but the same overall player cap


+1, besides, it seems it's difficult enough to arrange for 6 people in a locality to get together let alone an extra 2!


That's it!

Thing is that 8 members teams implies more difficult to perform teams. It is easier for well organized leagues, groups. You will get less teams and less total people I guess.

Another question:

I suggest that every single team, which get a place in the Pre-registration. Will not change more than one member to the final payment. Otherwise they will loss their place.

We need to avoid people that just pre-register a team to get the place and then starts to perform the definitive team, producing a false oberbooking.

One can take advantadge of his friends. I mean, I have a six people team. I can make 6 preregistrations with every member plus 5 NAF friends who will not come at all to NAF WC. I enhance six times the possibility to get a place.

Huge cheat? it is. Don't you feel it could happen?
Lizardcore - Dec 22, 2010 - 10:29 AM
Post subject:
      Pako wrote:
Huge cheat? it is. Don't you feel it could happen?


LOL. It will happen only if people are dumb enough to do it. And that will be pretty easy to notice (I guess the RTCs know their communities).

And for the 8 or 6 players, grumbbledock already very clearly demonstrated why it is not a good idea. For example, france has 18*6 players motivated, so reorganizing them into 8 people teams will be a piece of cake. But the countries with only 1 or 2 teams would then be short of guys... so instead of a world cup it would be a eurocup...
PANDA - Dec 22, 2010 - 05:01 PM
Post subject:
Days,

Loock the panda and how as to heavy as him alone. ( sorry for direct spanish traslation again ) Wink

The mesures done for the south-saharian tea party seem to me very logical and fair enought.

First of all a relative problem with the date of payment and confirmation of sure place. 8 of march its to late to have better price for airplane flights, for spanish flight can be a increment of 100 euros for go/return flights, countries far away more. Imagine for the teams waiting for free places the extra time and extra cost of the flight doing this to the no participation and reducing the worldcup drastically.

Its posible to traslate the begining of payment earlier febrauy to avoid this?

Another question... what's hapenig in france? somebody knows? 18 teams?

A small greeting for all.
Lucy - Dec 22, 2010 - 05:47 PM
Post subject:
@Panda

The result of the draw will be visible on the 6th of january.
So, you know if you're capable of coming to the tournament by that date(or the 7th).
All entries after the 6th of january are on a first come first serve basis.
Does that answer your question?

Lucy
DarkOrk20 - Dec 23, 2010 - 07:41 AM
Post subject:
      Lucy wrote:
@Panda

The result of the draw will be visible on the 6th of january.
So, you know if you're capable of coming to the tournament by that date(or the 7th).
All entries after the 6th of january are on a first come first serve basis.
Does that answer your question?

Lucy


That is only for countries that have more teams than they are allotted, correct?
Otherwise, we have until Feb 22 to get our teams together?
Valen - Dec 23, 2010 - 08:40 AM
Post subject:
As far as I know, you have to have your team in by the 6th Feb, after that deadline I assume the places left from countries that havents subscribed enough teams will go to the over subscribed countries.

For example at the moment Canada have 2 teams registered (I think) but have 4 slots, come the 6th January if this is still the case the 2 extras go to other countries that have more teams wanting to go

Could be wrong though
Notorious_jtb - Dec 23, 2010 - 08:57 AM
Post subject:
      Valen wrote:
As far as I know, you have to have your team in by the 6th Feb, after that deadline I assume the places left from countries that havents subscribed enough teams will go to the over subscribed countries.

For example at the moment Canada have 2 teams registered (I think) but have 4 slots, come the 6th January if this is still the case the 2 extras go to other countries that have more teams wanting to go

Could be wrong though


That is how I think it is supposed to work as well Valen.
jrock56 - Dec 23, 2010 - 09:03 AM
Post subject:
      Notorious_jtb wrote:
      Valen wrote:
As far as I know, you have to have your team in by the 6th Feb, after that deadline I assume the places left from countries that havents subscribed enough teams will go to the over subscribed countries.

For example at the moment Canada have 2 teams registered (I think) but have 4 slots, come the 6th January if this is still the case the 2 extras go to other countries that have more teams wanting to go

Could be wrong though


That is how I think it is supposed to work as well Valen.


Which date is correct though? 6th of Feb or Jan as both dates are mentioned.
Valen - Dec 23, 2010 - 09:23 AM
Post subject:
Oops, thats a typo by me sorry, 6th jan
Flix - Dec 23, 2010 - 11:21 AM
Post subject:
why not sort teams by CR summary, would be bad if some Countries cannot bring their starplayers.
Grumbledook - Dec 23, 2010 - 11:31 AM
Post subject:
because that data isn't anywhere near accurate

that is more a eurobowl centric thing as well, the world cup is more open and less serious
Lucy - Dec 23, 2010 - 02:42 PM
Post subject:
      DarkOrk20 wrote:
That is only for countries that have more teams than they are allotted, correct?
Otherwise, we have until Feb 22 to get our teams together?

A draw will be done on the 6th of January for those countries who have more teams in this thread than allotted.
So, these countries will know on the 6th/7th who will go.
Other countries have until the 22nd of February to subscribe, but will have a "first come first serve" after the 6th of January.

Example: Canada has two teams subscribed at the moment. If no one submits another team until the 6th, then these two teams are confirmed. Any Canadian team after the 6th will immediately know if they can come if they are the third or fourth to subscribe. Any fifth or later must wait to see what happens after the 22nd of February.

So, most squads will know by the 6th/7th if they can book flights. Only those teams who lost out on the draw have to wait until the 22nd of February when left over places will be handed out (drawn) to those teams who lost the draw on the 6th/7th of January.

Lucy
DarkOrk20 - Dec 23, 2010 - 05:34 PM
Post subject:
Thank you.
Daggers - Dec 23, 2010 - 10:18 PM
Post subject:
Makes sense to me. Thanks for clearing it up. I know I was geting a little confused.
Mepmuff - Dec 28, 2010 - 03:02 AM
Post subject:
      Dave wrote:
To preregister your team, reply to this post by copying the following and filling in the blanks. Replies that do not use this format will be ignored and deleted.

Dave/Lucy,

how strict are you going to be with ignoring and deleting registrations? I see some irregularities myself and if entries are deleted / not entered into the draw without warning I would expect hurt feelings and things of that nature.

Cheers,
Michel
Dave - Dec 28, 2010 - 07:36 AM
Post subject:
not too strict, this just makes sure that everyone enters the data we need (xcept for the madhobbit guys, strangely enough Very Happy)
jelmer - Dec 28, 2010 - 11:09 AM
Post subject:
      Dave wrote:
(xcept for the madhobbit guys, strangely enough Very Happy)


Fixed this... names are entered... could be changed though Razz sorry guys!
Pako - Dec 29, 2010 - 09:16 AM
Post subject:
How the draft will be do?

Are you going to firstly publish the list of teams ready to enter in it to avoid team losses or teams posted twice?

And then, are you going to use any public loto correlation (like Euro Loto) to pick the teams? Or it will be perform in one Netherlands lounge? Can we have videoconference?

Less than 10 days left, and players have no info about it.

...
Pako - Dec 30, 2010 - 06:24 AM
Post subject:
Hello again,

So, as there was no reply from last 24h (I checked, and all the organizers replies were couple of hours after original post) I want to suggest a draft mode.

To get it simple and public,

1- To perform a list for each country, alphabetical order maybe (just to make it simple and organized) of all the teams inscribed. To check there is nobody lost and nobody suscribed twice.

2- Pick up the first EuroMillion number (is 1 to 50 I guess) and start the count from team number 1 of each country. If you arrive at the end, then count restarts fron team number 1.

3- Team that is placed in the Xth place (being X the number of lotto) is in, plus the next teams to full the Y slots (being Y the slots open for each particular country).

[Example]

SPAIN

Basque Barbarians
Catenaccio Forever
Emen Corps
FEBL Team
Freeboters
Fumbblers
Fumbble Renegades
Garrapato Unako Team
Kung-Fu Panda GARBANZO!
LBN El Prat
SantaKO Team
Spanish Team

[People check if it's all right and then...]

EURO Million Numbers: 32 12 9 45...

We take 32.

Spanish 32nd team is: Garrapato Unako Team

And the 7 slots for spain:

Garrapato Unako Team
Kung-Fu Panda GARBANZO!
LBN El Prat
SantaKO Team
Spanish Team
Basque Barbarians
Catenaccio Forever
Lucy - Dec 30, 2010 - 08:25 AM
Post subject:
      Pako wrote:

So, as there was no reply from last 24h (I checked, and all the organizers replies were couple of hours after original post) I want to suggest a draft mode.


We'll do an honest draft.
Probably give each a number, put them on a piece of paper and draw until all slots are filled. It's that or let each NTO organise something.

Lucy
Pako - Dec 30, 2010 - 08:30 AM
Post subject:
      Lucy wrote:
      Pako wrote:

So, as there was no reply from last 24h (I checked, and all the organizers replies were couple of hours after original post) I want to suggest a draft mode.


We'll do an honest draft.
Lucy


Is anyone doubting about it?
azzroag - Dec 30, 2010 - 03:05 PM
Post subject:
hi !

first of all : thanks for the work on this WC and the rest to do.

my question : is it a old dream to think that it will be more than 400 places in fact or is it something impossible ?

have a nice end of year !
Doubleskulls - Dec 30, 2010 - 03:21 PM
Post subject:
Use this - http://www.random.org/lists/

Put all the teams for a country in a list and then sort them. That not only gives you the number you need, but also orders the "reserve" teams in case any drop out or allocations are changed.
Eric.R. - Dec 30, 2010 - 07:14 PM
Post subject:
I am planning on going, is there anywhere to get the rules in a "One-stop-shop" fashion cause I ain't got the patience to search though forums for everything . . . in essence: "if they ain't getting their shit together I ain't going to waste my time"; as much as I love this game and have the freedom to go to tourneys, a journey 1/2-way across the world [plus $$$] that fails to provide info beforehand is gonna piss me off. Sorry to be so blunt, but I doubt I am the only one who want straight answers; and I am not talking out my arse as I have recently heard 3 different formats for this tourney . . . which means I am either ignorant of what is going on or those I talk to are idiots . . .

AND, to those in charge DO NOT ASSUME ANY COACHES HAS ANY UNDERSTANDING OF THE LAST WORLD CUP RULES . . . there have been many changes in the last few few years and new coaches. Do not be complacent . . .

Here is a crazy idea: a locked forum that lists nothing but the rules for the tourney.
beaso - Dec 30, 2010 - 08:49 PM
Post subject:
+1 to this.

I'm still suprised that the venue and more importantly cost has not been put up yet?

Whilst the price is not going to effect those who are travelling further than Europe you are expecting people to pay by the 22nd of Feb. I'm sure if the price is as high as been mentioned that quite a few of the European teams will dwindle in numbers saving half the grief that is going.

Is there any reason why we still don't know this?
Grumbledook - Dec 31, 2010 - 04:30 AM
Post subject:
What like the locked announcement thread above this one ;]

All the details are posted in there that have been given out so far and that is the place to look for future stuff
Eric.R. - Dec 31, 2010 - 06:06 AM
Post subject:
Neither is it locked nor of any use when trying to find out real facts about the tourney; it is 10 months till this happens and we are still only talking about pre-reg.
Grumbledook - Dec 31, 2010 - 08:21 AM
Post subject:
Not locked for you due to being a RTO, it is locked for the rest of us plebs ;]

While I would like to know the rules as well, surely they aren't a big part in deciding if you are going to go or not? When I flew to Canada from the UK to play it didn't come into my thinking. I've also flown to Chicago twice to play in a 5 game tournament and I hate 5 game tournaments...

All the known info is it that thread though as I said and it is the only single place to go to find the info. It that info isn't there then it hasn't been given out yet. I understand your concern though assuming you know the dates and where you have to fly to, that is the biggest stumbling block out of the way. The perceived cost of the tournament entry is also listed so using the higher amount as an estimate and take a look at some hotel prices and you have the ball park of what it is going to cost.

Being Canadian, there looks to be more than enough slots if you want to go assuming you put your team forward during this pre reg time.

Hopefully though we will get some more solid info soon, I wanna get a new team converted / painted up in time and knowing the rules will pay a big part of that when we can only take one of any race on a team.
Doubleskulls - Dec 31, 2010 - 07:38 PM
Post subject:
@Eric R - does it really matter what the rules are right now? A few months out - sure - but now? I'd much prefer them to concentrate on finalising the venue, accommodation etc.
Notorious_jtb - Jan 01, 2011 - 06:50 PM
Post subject:
I think venue and accomodation are key at this stage. It would be lovely to know the exact ruleset but costs are going to determine attendance rather than rules.

p.s.I suspect Eric.r. has been hitting the Christmas Eggnog a little hard, he gets grumpy when he does that Smile

p.p.s. Also, it is very hard the first time you run any given event. It is a diferent group of people running the WC this time. I remember the first year Deathbowl moved to Ottawa from Montreal, we had a different venue for each day and the final round was played in a pretty full bar full of random folks. Fun times!!!! It is a breeze these days as we have most things set in stone year to year.
daloonieshaman - Jan 02, 2011 - 12:52 AM
Post subject:
Is there a schedule of the times for the games?
Lycos - Jan 02, 2011 - 04:06 PM
Post subject:
Just to let everyone know, I think many of the questions being asked these last two pages back are going to be answered in one blast by the organising team!
Some are good questions and I can understand guys like Eric being worried about travelling half way across the world without some detail.

But in fairness, the venue is sorted, they are just nailing down costs (food has an impact on this so decisions being made there), teams and numbers largely sorted too but re costs, for international travellers, its like ten Euros here or there on ticket price.

Eric, rules will be more or less like last time but yes, in the next few weeks (in Jan) we can nail down a thread for that if you like, thats a good suggestion. And DS, same for a schedule. Both logical questions but the team have to process this one thing at a time............. we are definately talking more than 400 coaches, c'mon, how awesome is that? This is a lot of work for these guys.
daloonieshaman - Jan 02, 2011 - 09:46 PM
Post subject:
Thank you
just trying to figure out flight times and requested days off
beaso - Jan 03, 2011 - 04:19 AM
Post subject:
If the venue is sorted can you please tell us then so we can start booking rooms? I'm over the cost of this now but competing with 400 odd other people for a room close by does.

Cheers
Thadrin - Jan 03, 2011 - 06:19 AM
Post subject:
Most of us are waiting for our places to be confirmed or not so there's no real hurry.
Dajegas - Jan 04, 2011 - 09:34 AM
Post subject:
Hi all,
As we can see in the summary in the 3rd post of the Registration thread, the only nations going heavily "out of bounds" regarding the team limit are France, Italy, UK and Spain (as expected, someone may correctly point out).
But the first nation as as many "exceeding" teams as all the others together: will there be some sort of compensation for this? Otherwise if everything stays like this there is a very high chance that all teams coming out of the final draft will be from France...

Cheers!
Grumbledook - Jan 04, 2011 - 05:37 PM
Post subject:
would have thought they give the extra slots out evenly amongst the countries that has the demand, then they randomise that nations teams into those slots
Dajegas - Jan 05, 2011 - 02:07 AM
Post subject:
      Grumbledook wrote:
would have thought they give the extra slots out evenly amongst the countries that has the demand, then they randomise that nations teams into those slots

This was my assumption as well but there is no clear cut statement in the rules, therefore as far as I know it's mine (and yours) wishful thinking so far Wink
DOA - Jan 05, 2011 - 05:42 AM
Post subject:
Can you tell us when write the post with pick-start the draft?
Which hour i mean.
Thanks
Lucy - Jan 05, 2011 - 07:25 AM
Post subject:
I'm having a phone in with Dave this evening.
I hope we can mention the time the draw is done.

Furthermore, extra places available will be evenly handed out. Smaller countries/newcomers will get priority.
But, if 7 extra are available for the biggest four (for example) than everybody gets one extra and the last three will be drawn between them.

Lucy
Sebco - Jan 05, 2011 - 11:12 AM
Post subject:
      Dajegas wrote:
Hi all,
As we can see in the summary in the 3rd post of the Registration thread, the only nations going heavily "out of bounds" regarding the team limit are France, Italy, UK and Spain (as expected, someone may correctly point out).
But the first nation as as many "exceeding" teams as all the others together: will there be some sort of compensation for this? Otherwise if everything stays like this there is a very high chance that all teams coming out of the final draft will be from France...

Cheers!


I easily understand why small Blood Bowl countries have to be served first. For example Austria or Switzerland had only 1 slot so, if they have 2 teams ready to join, it's logical to give them first extra slot.

But, in my humble opinion, for nations like Spain, UK, Italy and France, the problem isn't the number of teams which will come to World Cup, the problem is the number of teams which won't be allowed to come. In other words, the problem is the number of coachs who will be disappointed 'cause they were ready to come and we told them "no". That's what we have to manage in our community since a few weeks and that's really not an easy thing to do.
Lizardcore - Jan 05, 2011 - 12:42 PM
Post subject:
      Lucy wrote:
But, if 7 extra are available for the biggest four (for example) than everybody gets one extra and the last three will be drawn between them.
Lucy


That totally make sense !
Lucy - Jan 06, 2011 - 03:39 AM
Post subject:
This will be the new venue (confirmed today):
http://www.rodehoed.nl/en/
It was a clandestine church in the centre of Amsterdam:

This will be the main playing area:
http://img211.imageshack.us/i/rodehoed.jpg

Lucy
Lizardcore - Jan 06, 2011 - 09:32 AM
Post subject:
Great news !

Just a question that everybody might have:

why not a double swiss system like last worldcup ? Seems more fair to define the World champion.

Edit: i was indeed speaking of the individual ranking, not team rankings Embarassed
Grumbledook - Jan 06, 2011 - 12:04 PM
Post subject:
with different countries having a different amount of teams "fair" doesn't really come into it

I see the world cup more as a good way to get a lot of coaches together from around the world

I don't think it will make a big difference to the end results anyway
Dave - Jan 06, 2011 - 12:12 PM
Post subject:
neither do we .. the best player will probabely need to win 7 or 8 games, and lose none, that's gonna be a tough nail in any case.
Sebco - Jan 06, 2011 - 12:42 PM
Post subject:
      Grumbledook wrote:
with different countries having a different amount of teams "fair" doesn't really come into it

I see the world cup more as a good way to get a lot of coaches together from around the world

I don't think it will make a big difference to the end results anyway


According to me, Lizardcore didn't speak about the team competition but about the individual competition.

For team competition, this change (no swiss sytem for individuals but only swiss system for teams and then team captain always faces other team captain, #2 always faces other team #2, etc...) doesn't change anything. For individual competition, in my opinion, it does change something (we did yet have this debate about french championships as some french team tournaments use different rules for pairings inside the teams).

That said, at this moment, I do more care about the number of coaches who will attend this World Cup II than about this kind of rules changements. If I have the chance to come, I will be happy, whatever the rules could be ! Wink
Dave - Jan 06, 2011 - 12:46 PM
Post subject:
ok .. I'm doing the draws .. now .. will post them when my kids have been put to bed
Kubbo - Jan 06, 2011 - 12:54 PM
Post subject:
Oh my GOD...dont post, at all... instead of writing thinks half!!! We are all with the mouse arrow on KLM's booking botton !!

Thank u! ...i was joking of course! Wink
andrea_parrella - Jan 06, 2011 - 01:48 PM
Post subject:
Two question.
1) Are there possibilities that the number 400 will be increase?
2) For the rest of the teams (22nd of February), it will be choose with today randomize?

Sorry for my English, not very good.
Dave - Jan 06, 2011 - 03:52 PM
Post subject:
EVERYONE PLEASE NOTE!!

The draw we did today is NOT the last draw.

53 Teams now know for sure that they have a place at the WC. We decided to do today's draw to be as FAIR as possible to ALL COUNTRIES across the world. Now those teams who have to travel far can book their flights. If our previous posts didn't make this clear enough then we're sincerely sorry for that.

As the venue Lucy mentioned today can hold 70 teams there's still 17 team spots that will be given away at the draw we'll hold February 22nd.
Of those 17 spots several (may) go to teams from countries that haven't filled their allocation, yet. Also precedence will be given to teams that have to travel far from say the USA or Australia.

On the 22nd of February we'll do an other draw. The big countries (Italy, Spain, France, UK) will then get the big share of the remaining team spots.


list of teams now in:

1 Lez Azes
2 CHARISM'AZES
3 PILOU 2
4 VESUNNA
5 LES CHEVALIERS DU POW
6 EUSKAL TURNOVER
7 LES REMIS
8 SOCK'S
9 Legio Flaminia LEGA GLADIO
10 LEGA GLADIO Strike Team
11 ffstore.it LIUT
12 LUCCINI
13 ROMA LEGA GLADIO II
14 Bologna Magicabula!
15 Evolution - The A.M.'s Revenge
16 Team Österreich II
17 White Cross Connection
18 Kung-Fu Panda GARBANZO!
19 SantaKO Team
20 Catenaccio Forever
21 Spanish Team
22 THE LINEMEN
23 FEBL Team
24 Emen Corps
25 TEAM GEORDIE
26 Carrot Crunch All-Stars
27 Waterbowl
28 Exiles
29 The Whiteshirts
30 Team Wales
31 Team Chaos
32 Pirates of Copenhagen: Dead Man's Chest
34 Pink Pansies
35 Team Argentina
36 Denmark #4
37 Team Wombat
38 World Police Force
39 Ottawa/Gatineau Canada
40 Southern/Eastern Ontario
41 Arnhem Fantasy Football League (A.F.F.L.)
42 El Dodo's Disciples
43 Team Madhobbit
44 Hellhound
45 Unqualified
46 West Berlin Patriots
47 Alsterbowl
48 Team HQ
49 Team Rodent
50 Team UCL
51 Team Brass
52 Team Hi5
53 Goleadores
Snake_Eyes - Jan 06, 2011 - 04:55 PM
Post subject:
hi,
first of all, thank you for all the work you are all putting in this!

but why will now the "big" countries get the big share of the remaining spots?!
what happened with "although countries with few allocated spots on the original list will get better draw chances (like Austria, Portugal etc)"?

BR
Chris
andrea_parrella - Jan 06, 2011 - 05:03 PM
Post subject:
the teams are 52, there isn't number 33.
Canales - Jan 06, 2011 - 05:27 PM
Post subject:
Hi all,

What I do not understand is the need to wait for another month and a half before doing the second draw. Aren't 1 or 2 weeks at most enough time for the stragglers?

I sincerely appreciate your work and wish the best for the event. However, knowing many others are as disappointed as me at being left out is of little solace. Crying or Very sad
daloonieshaman - Jan 06, 2011 - 05:56 PM
Post subject:
      Dave wrote:
neither do we .. the best player will probabely need to win 7 or 8 games, and lose none, that's gonna be a tough nail in any case.


man now I am gonna have to change team to my all 0-16 goblins to win
daloonieshaman - Jan 06, 2011 - 06:12 PM
Post subject:
      Quote:
Me venting:
My big question is this
If you do not have a registration
you do not have a rules set posted
you do not have a timetable set other than some odd time over 3 days

Why in the world are you limiting registration until after say 1 or 2 months after PAID registration and if you say you are afraid of not getting a venue I laugh at you. Why did you not start PAID registration when you knew the date.

and if your excuse is that you have no idea how much it would be to book the place you have not done your homework. Excuses are excuses but the WC should be open to all that wish to register (over a certain time period) regardless of country or overall numbers

Money talks and estimates are a dime a dozen

Well we are uncertain how many will attend. Again the homework thing.\\

Shoot high on the estimates and get more prizes (spread the love) with the surplus and a stipend for WC 2015

It is okay to ask the several thousand members of the community for help
10 people 1000 people same thing it is all about scale

just my outlandish opinions

Estimate interview
We need a venue with chairs and tables, water service, Mic
I need estimates on
300, 400, 500, 600, and 700 people
Thank you

rinse and repeat
yes you will get places that will not have the space for the larger numbers
Over the course of 4-6 countries with the help of a bunch of members you should have had 20-50 estimates within a week or 2

yes and hindsight is 20/20 and a great lesson for the next WC
Notorious_jtb - Jan 07, 2011 - 08:41 AM
Post subject:
      Canales wrote:
Hi all,

What I do not understand is the need to wait for another month and a half before doing the second draw. Aren't 1 or 2 weeks at most enough time for the stragglers?

I sincerely appreciate your work and wish the best for the event. However, knowing many others are as disappointed as me at being left out is of little solace. Crying or Very sad


I understand the dissapointment and I am sorry anyone has to miss out.

But there is a rationale for the delay. Some people are not on the boards as frequently and can be hard to reach. Also, distance and planning plays a part. I know that some of the coaches in Western Canada wanted to wait until Spring to decide about making the trip. Obviously that is not an option, but there a lot of factors in play here.

People travelling from Canada, USA anywhere in the Southern Hemisphere are basically committing to a big expensive vacation over 1200 Euros at least. That combined with the time off from work required essentially means it becomes the family vacation for the year and therefore more expensive.

For Western European coaches it is just a long weekend in Amsterdam with maybe 1 or 2 days off work. Much easier to commit to and organise for.
Canales - Jan 07, 2011 - 09:09 AM
Post subject:
Hi Notorious_jtb, I simply wondered whether the Feb 22nd date had been chosen for a specific reason.

I can relate to your point of view, but seriously... there have been 4 years to know whether you can commit the time and resources required to attend the event. Imho, it should not be an on-the-fly decision (the pre-registration announcement was made over a month ago). It is also hard to believe that some people are hard to reach in today's age of digital and mobile communications.

In fact, the longer we wait, the more expensive flights/accommodation are going to be.

That's all. Smile
Notorious_jtb - Jan 07, 2011 - 12:18 PM
Post subject:
      Canales wrote:
Hi Notorious_jtb, I simply wondered whether the Feb 22nd date had been chosen for a specific reason.

I can relate to your point of view, but seriously... there have been 4 years to know whether you can commit the time and resources required to attend the event. Imho, it should not be an on-the-fly decision (the pre-registration announcement was made over a month ago). It is also hard to believe that some people are hard to reach in today's age of digital and mobile communications.

In fact, the longer we wait, the more expensive flights/accommodation are going to be.

That's all. Smile


I take your point Canales Smile

Despite agreeing with you in principle on all points but some folks like to leave some of these decisions to the latest possible moment so here I am thinking any time later is better. I don't know why the 22nd was chosen as the specific date.
beaso - Jan 07, 2011 - 06:01 PM
Post subject:
Spending over 3K in Euros to come over for most of us below the equator is something we're taking seriously. And what concern's a lot of people still is that we cannot properly plan this due to not knowing where abouts the event is.

I'm sorry but 99% doesn't cut it really because it means there is still a chance the organisers don't have anything. Hence why you've only got one team signed up from Oz/Nz the rest of our teams are likely to come together from all over the country and therefore probably won't be registered until closer to the Feb 22 date.

As Notiorious said, this isn't a road trip unlike for you Eurpeans this is holiday/expidition with many of us combining this into some sort of holiday elsewhere.
Lucy - Jan 07, 2011 - 06:45 PM
Post subject:
I'm signing the contract next week. It took many discussions before everything was satisfactory for both sides.

It's 100%

It's here: Googlemaps: Keizersgracht 102 Amsterdam

Lucy
Elyoukey - Jan 08, 2011 - 06:15 AM
Post subject:
sorry but there is something i do not understand, according to the brochure we can find on their website :
http://www.rodehoed.nl/downloads/Room%20Rental%20Rates.pdf
there are more than 600 places. which is enough for all the teams to attend. So why the preselection ? why not getting the whole place for 3 days and dividing the price between all the players ? (according to my maths it would be about 11euros per person if all the rooms was full, so 20 euros should be more than ok to avoid money loss for the organisators.)
For me this looks as simple as that, but obviously i mess something, so what did i mess ?
Podfrey - Jan 08, 2011 - 04:11 PM
Post subject:
@Elyoukey - 11.83 Euros each (assuming rental of all rooms, being charged the higher weekend rate for the Friday, and 600 attendees)

That sounds a lot more realistic than 150 Euros. Even adding in food (3 x lunches @ 5 Euros per person per meal?), a couple of Euros for the prize fund, a few more for a freebie giveaway, a couple of Euros to cover "sundries" and then some for organisers/refs accommodation*, I'm much happier with these prices!! Something around the 40 to 45 Euro mark should cover all needs? Well done Lucy, Dutch Dave et al!! Smile


*remember 1 Euro per person increase = +600 Euro to the organisation fund
Elyoukey - Jan 09, 2011 - 01:39 AM
Post subject:
      Podfrey wrote:

That sounds a lot more realistic than 150 Euros. Even adding in food (3 x lunches @ 5 Euros per person per meal?), a couple of Euros for the prize fund, a few more for a freebie giveaway, a couple of Euros to cover "sundries" and then some for organisers/refs accommodation*, I'm much happier with these prices!! Something around the 40 to 45 Euro mark should cover all needs? Well done Lucy, Dutch Dave et al!! Smile

actually i am not arguing about the cost, i know for quite sure that the organisators are not making money on us. If they do fix a higher price there is a reason (and i don't really care this point)
What i would like to know is why limiting the places to 450 when the rodehoed can contains 600+ persons ? i do care this point because lot friends of mine will not be able to come because of this limitation and a NAF tournament is supposed to be open.
Thadrin - Jan 09, 2011 - 03:30 AM
Post subject:
I have no idea if I'm right...but that 600 could easily be for when there are lectures or similar...you then have to accouht for the space taken up by gtables for the boards etc.

Just throwinig the idea out there.

Neither Dave or Lucy are novices when it comes to tournaments - the Dutch Open and Bubble are amongst the longest running tournaments there are - so I'm sure there are perfectly understandable reasons why the stated capacity of the venue doesn't apply.

FWIW I would fully expect the two teams which didn't get spots from Austria and Switzerland to be given priority when the remaining slots are given out, seeing as both nations only received one each originally.
bdg - Jan 09, 2011 - 05:36 AM
Post subject:
      Thadrin wrote:

FWIW I would fully expect the two teams which didn't get spots from Austria and Switzerland to be given priority when the remaining slots are given out, seeing as both nations only received one each originally.


What a great idea !
daloonieshaman - Jan 09, 2011 - 11:46 AM
Post subject:
There have been suggestions that this country or that country get more places.
They will make their decision based on whatever notions they see fit.
There is no fairness in making tough decisions on who can play after a grossly underestimated number of desiring attendees.
Doubleskulls - Jan 09, 2011 - 12:09 PM
Post subject:
I don't think you are being particularly fair. They've increased numbers more than 50% over last time - and IIRC last time was about the right size for those wanting to attend. That feels like a very generous increase at risk. Also I would anticipate several individuals and teams will drop out once they have to pay.
daloonieshaman - Jan 09, 2011 - 12:36 PM
Post subject:
      Doubleskulls wrote:
I don't think you are being particularly fair. They've increased numbers more than 50% over last time - and IIRC last time was about the right size for those wanting to attend. That feels like a very generous increase at risk. Also I would anticipate several individuals and teams will drop out once they have to pay.


People are being totally fair.
There is nothing we can do about the flaws based on the process of making a decision.
They suffered from having made decisions based on old data.

? time:
How much has the membership grown since the Last WC?

Would it be arrogance or an oversight to not see that attendance would grow once the event was moved off a tiny island, with a fourth (or less) the population on said little island?

Was any real effort made to get good location data before deciding on the area for the WC?

Was there any language in the contract to rent more space based on registration?


We can make a laundry list of decisions made that did not benefit the community and event.

We understand that they were thinking that they were doing the right thing in the right way. We also understand that they made some tough choices. We also understand that the scale has hugely increased. Yet this forum and this community gives us the right to point out the errors and offer suggestions for the next event.
Podfrey - Jan 09, 2011 - 02:26 PM
Post subject:
@ Thadrin - I believe the capacity numbers quoted were based on the venue's "sit down meal" estimation. It shouldn't be too great a difference from four people sat at a table having a meal to the same four people playing.
Teg - Jan 10, 2011 - 01:01 AM
Post subject:
Just to ask, why the italian location (able to host 3.000+ players) was discarded in favour of a location not able to host all of us?
Pako - Jan 10, 2011 - 02:07 AM
Post subject:
      Quote:
Teams that miss the initial draw will go onto a new list, sorted per country. No claims can be made for whatever rank a team got during the initial draw. (so being 'france #8' is just as much bad luck as being 'france #20')


I'm just... don't know. :S

What are organizers to do if some of the initial draw teams don't pay the preregistration? Are you going to use the initial draw or the second, brand new one?

I think this second draw its absolutely unuseful if you're using a randomized list that gives you an order for all the teams...
Pako - Jan 10, 2011 - 02:28 AM
Post subject:
      Teg wrote:
Just to ask, why the italian location (able to host 3.000+ players) was discarded in favour of a location not able to host all of us?


BTW, I hope next time 2015 WC organizers SHOULD guarantee at least 1000 places to be consider...

Last time in Nott arround 25% (or more) people were playing in pub tables 10 min ago walking from GW Warhammer World.

Right now, at least in Spain we were talking so long about such a BIG increase in coming participants to the II WC. Are we so many smart? Don't think so.

Increase 50% numbers for the most successfull tourney ever is absolutely underestimated. It is only clear for people that are not organizers? Our SkullCup individual tourney had 50% increase in its second and third edition. Are you kidding me? WC is in the same way? My god...

RAI convention center can host thousands of people. Here we have now 450. I'm sure you're trying to do the best. We appreciatte it. Really, but if you're in, you should be ready to get criticisms.

People, community, is claiming for increase in places. No notice about it from organization. We cannot have the "pub tables" even in a different location.

Add to this arbitrary rules:

Why not double swiss? We have in our team 2nd best player in the world. Are you giving him players by random? He will play with the goblin guy of our rivals by serendipity? Better for us, but not fair at all.

Why a re-draw of teams out? if you have a list by randomized order?

I'm just hallucinating. This is not a community event at all. This is a randomly closed event.

Korgluk, as I said is the 2nd NAF ranked player, told me "ok, whithout half of spaniards, frenchs, italians and so... I don't think if I want to come yet". What about that for the NAF? I think it isd indicating that something is going wrong...

Is not a question about us, is a question about all the people. I want to clear it: It is a huge work, we appreciatte it. Maybe my words are too hard but it sounds like lots of people think.

Your first priority should to be to get place for all. I guess you should use country forums to pulse an average number. If not. You should fixed it when you find this huge overbooking. If not, the II NAF WC is going to be unsuccessful from the very beginning.

Sorry. It's a pitty to not have all NAF players in.
Korgluk - Jan 10, 2011 - 04:08 AM
Post subject:
      Teg wrote:
Just to ask, why the italian location (able to host 3.000+ players) was discarded in favour of a location not able to host all of us?


Oh my God!!!! Shocked

      Pako wrote:

Korgluk told me "ok, whithout half of spaniards, frenchs, italians and so... I don't think if I want to come yet".


I hope that in 2015 we will have the really NAFWC II. In 2011 we'll have another fucking Eurobowl! Rolling Eyes
Paloji - Jan 10, 2011 - 04:34 AM
Post subject:
      Dave wrote:
Prizes:
most probabely:

Team 1,2,3 last
Individual 1,2,3, last
Sunday comeback team, individueel
Most TD individual
Most CAS individual
Best Stunty individual
Best Painting (we're not sure on the logistics of this one yet, it may be dropped or done in another way)


Really?? in a tournament called "WORLD CUP" there may be no painting prize?? are you serious?? I know the "important" thing is to play...but there are lots of player (myself included) thatn enjoy painting as much as playing, some even prefer painting. I know people who wanted to win the painting prize in the "world cup" (myself included)...

This hobby is not just playing with dices and miniatures...this hobby has a big background, an "art part", transform and paint miniatures the best you can...I can not believe that the organization has even thought the possibility of dropping all this...
Nicodaz - Jan 10, 2011 - 05:05 AM
Post subject:
Hi mates. First of all thanks for your great job .Even if there are a lot of disapointements I 'm sure the final result will be huge.

One question about team. Could we have substitute players and how many?

Maybe could it be a solution to increase the number of players without to increase the number of tables?
Rodders - Jan 10, 2011 - 05:49 AM
Post subject:
I'm hoping the next one isn't in europe then maybe we won't get so much bitching abouty the size of the venue if europeans have to travel long distance and spend what the us/canadian/southern hemisphere guys are having to.

i'd also like to offer my thanks and congratulations to lucy Dave and Niels no one expected the hordes that the french and spaniards have
lunchmoney - Jan 10, 2011 - 05:57 AM
Post subject:
      Rodders wrote:
I'm hoping the next one isn't in europe ....

+1 for many reasons. I am thoroughly looking forward to this, but would love the WC3 to be in the America's or Oz Smile
Darkson - Jan 10, 2011 - 06:09 AM
Post subject:
Let's assume they had booked a place big enough to hold 1000+ coaches, with the requisite cost attached, and then only 500 or so people applied - that would have been a huge increase on the cost (to the NAF and/or the players).

Yeah, it's a shame that not "everyone" that wants to go can, but that's surely better than booking somewhere we don't fill, then expecting those that do attend to pay double (or more) because the organisers were over-ambitious.

Props to the Dutch lads (and I'm not just saying that because Team Exile got picked Wink ).
Teg - Jan 10, 2011 - 06:20 AM
Post subject:
      Darkson wrote:
Let's assume they had booked a place big enough to hold 1000+ coaches, with the requisite cost attached, and then only 500 or so people applied - that would have been a huge increase on the cost (to the NAF and/or the players).

Yeah, it's a shame that not "everyone" that wants to go can, but that's surely better than booking somewhere we don't fill, then expecting those that do attend to pay double (or more) because the organisers were over-ambitious.

Props to the Dutch lads (and I'm not just saying that because Team Exile got picked Wink ).


Then maybe there is a misunderstanding as the guy (Mad) that proposed the italian location said:
      Mad wrote:
NAFWC A MODENA AVEVA COSTO ISCRIZIONE A GIOCATORE 0 (ZERO)

Translated is something like:

The NAF World Cup in Modena (Italy) would have a subscription price per player equal to 0 (zero)
Elyoukey - Jan 10, 2011 - 06:26 AM
Post subject:
      Darkson wrote:

Yeah, it's a shame that not "everyone" that wants to go can, but that's surely better than booking somewhere we don't fill, then expecting those that do attend to pay double (or more) because the organisers were over-ambitious.

Concerning the room location and according to the brochure, the price would be 11euros so 22 euros for booking the rooms. I don't think most of the people would have cancelled their subscription for 10euro increase.
for the rest of the price i don't know what the ~100euros do represent so i cannot argue on this part. but may be some transparency would help us to understand (and utopically to help)

also it seems to me that at the moment when the number of places was given to us (early december), the rooms had not been booked yet. So no prebooking was required at this moment. Probably i still do miss something here.



Note that my team has also been picked so i am not arguing to get in.

Diablange - Jan 10, 2011 - 06:30 AM
Post subject:
      Rodders wrote:

i'd also like to offer my thanks and congratulations to lucy Dave and Niels no one expected the hordes that the french and spaniards have

I'd have to disagree on this, I know reports have been made starting last year with estimations of 500-600 people interested in WCII...

Of course, once the place is chosen it's too late, then you have to rely on the organizers to do their best. And I trust Dave and Lucy to do the best thing possible with the place they have and time remaining... Smile

      Rodders wrote:
I'm hoping the next one isn't in europe then maybe we won't get so much bitching abouty the size of the venue if europeans have to travel long distance and spend what the us/canadian/southern hemisphere guys are having to.


      Darkson wrote:
Let's assume they had booked a place big enough to hold 1000+ coaches, with the requisite cost attached, and then only 500 or so people applied - that would have been a huge increase on the cost (to the NAF and/or the players).

It's true if it's outside of Europe, the venue will probably be less numerous. I'll let people involved in the selection (maybe starting earlier for WCIII ?) discuss what is better...

But I'd like to reply to the 2 comments I quoted that :
1- Places with a more important capacity can be found, it was for example possible to have around 1000 people in Agen. Problem was the accessibility (which I can understand, I'm only discussing the capacity)
2- It's a "huge" Wink mistake to think haveing a very bigger capacity is having a huge impact on price ! This will of course have an impact but more likely to be small than "huge". The huge impact would be on feeding people but you can handle part of it after registration, maybe even after payment milestone !

All of this to say : OK, for this WCII, let's do the best we can with the place and time we have, but this would be a mistake to think we cannot organize an event able to have 1000people at the same place !

Kindly,

Diablange
Pako - Jan 10, 2011 - 06:54 AM
Post subject:
I will be there outside Europe, right now. Can I save a place for my team? :/

      Quote:
No one expected the hordes that the french and spaniards have


Maybe frenchs and spaniards did so. And could be asked about it. It is called prospective organization. One thing that many of us suposed to be done.

      Quote:
Let's assume they had booked a place big enough to hold 1000+ coaches, with the requisite cost attached, and then only 500 or so people applied - that would have been a huge increase on the cost (to the NAF and/or the players).


Many meeting locations have polivalent rooms ready to be occupied or leaved beside the main one. That kind of places are ready to adapt to meeting size, without a big impact on venue if you confirm it pretty soon (10 months maybe?). The problem is find out one place with this possibilities? It is called organization.

Let me see. Right now, Dutch people are managing an oversized tourney as best as they can. The housekeeping problem for me is that it will not be oversized at all.

1- NAF TO or tournament advisors/referees for each country should made a prospection of players per country. They could recognize "real" teams that the will come.
2- NAF WC Organizers should propose polivalent meeting places to place the venue based on real perspectives.
3- NAF should choose the best place to cover the main points.
4- NAF WC Organizers should pick up the place and publish venue costs, tounament settings, timetable and hosting.
5- NAF players should pay venue before 1st March (9 months before) or 1st Feb (10 months).
NAF WC Organizers should pay the "basic" tournament allocation plus a number of extra places (maybe 5-10%) (included in the venue) for teams to be first served from 1st march to 1stMay (6 months) or just for teams from outside Europe (alternatively open places if they are not runned up).
6- All the NAF members that wanted to, could come to II NAF WC.

I trusted NAF. I supported they from the very beginning (take a look on TFF and here) and I wanted a place from the very beginning also.

The problem was that many people thank that responsibles were doing things in the rightest way (don't missunderstand me, I know all people tried to do the best) and it is demonstrated that it wasn't. Many people are out. This is not the rightest way. I'm sorry, Dave, Lucy and all other organizers, but that's it. From December NAF priority number one should be to increase places in the NAF WC. And also it wasn't (or seemed to).

Let's learn about it. Please. I want not only me, nor all my friends and NAF players in III NAF WC.
Canales - Jan 10, 2011 - 08:15 AM
Post subject:
Well, what is done is done, let's not discuss about WCIII when the second edition has not even happened yet!

The organizers have chosen Amsterdam. Great localion, we can all agree on that.

The venue can hold 450 players. Excellent.

Now, there is an excess number of players who have no material room to play.

Considering we have several months until the event takes place, wouldn't it be possible to find another room with capacity for those additional people? A room for X players (to be determined asap) as close as possible to the main event hotel. It should not be very costly (imagine $10 per head), and everybody who so wishes could attend. It is a win-win situation in my book.

Really, isn't it possible to do this? In the WCI, players played in two different buildings. I know it would be great if we could all be in the same room, but it would be even better if everybody can attend to the event in the first place!
Canales - Jan 10, 2011 - 08:20 AM
Post subject:
Please, please, let's not waste energy fighting over this matter.

Let's try to find a solution together, there is still enough time to make it happen.
Teg - Jan 10, 2011 - 08:33 AM
Post subject:
I'll be very happy if the organizers can find an additional location near to the main location to allow everyone to take part of the event.
Please let us know if this is possible.
Notorious_jtb - Jan 10, 2011 - 08:34 AM
Post subject:
      Canales wrote:
Please, please, let's not waste energy fighting over this matter.

Let's try to find a solution together, there is still enough time to make it happen.


I agree lets not fight about this. There are still a number of things that can happen including many teams withdrawing when asked to pay for the registration. I would expect at least 10% to withdraw.
Pako - Jan 10, 2011 - 08:59 AM
Post subject:
      Notorious_jtb wrote:
      Canales wrote:
Please, please, let's not waste energy fighting over this matter.

Let's try to find a solution together, there is still enough time to make it happen.


I agree lets not fight about this. There are still a number of things that can happen including many teams withdrawing when asked to pay for the registration. I would expect at least 10% to withdraw.


Agree. But no notice every time that someone suggested to increase number of participants...
Canales - Jan 10, 2011 - 10:29 AM
Post subject:
      Pako wrote:
no notice every time that someone suggested to increase number of participants...


I do not know how the event is being organized (who is in charge of what), but I am sure the organization committee, plus NAF President & any other relevant person, can schedule some sort of meeting (e-mail, a post here in the NAF site, etc.) in order to discuss the possibility of looking for another room.

Maybe I am clueless, but it seems to me that getting another room should be feasible at this point.

If three matches are played per day, that should leave us plenty of time to go from one building to the other.

Lycos et al. do you think this might be doable?
longfang - Jan 10, 2011 - 12:03 PM
Post subject:
Assuming me and my team (who by the way, have traveled to over 50 international tourney's between us, 4 of us were at Ressurection in 2002, 3 at the 1st ever NAF tourney, 3 helped out at the WC in 2007, 1 ex pres) get a place at this world cup..............can we play in a Coffee Shop?
Canales - Jan 10, 2011 - 12:10 PM
Post subject:
      longfang wrote:
Assuming me and my team (who by the way, have traveled to over 50 international tourney's between us, 4 of us were at Ressurection in 2002, 3 at the 1st ever NAF tourney, 3 helped out at the WC in 2007, 1 ex pres) get a place at this world cup..............can we play in a Coffee Shop?

See, that is exactly my point. If the WC is supposed to be a BB party, why leave some people out when there is still a chance not to?
Panico - Jan 10, 2011 - 12:31 PM
Post subject:
I bet Del and the others will be there in a coffee shop anyway, World Cup or not World Cup Wink
Del, can I joinT you? Very Happy
Deathwing - Jan 10, 2011 - 12:38 PM
Post subject:
      Teg wrote:
Just to ask, why the italian location (able to host 3.000+ players) was discarded in favour of a location not able to host all of us?


Just to answer this, the process was as follows:
      Lycos wrote:

So here is the up to date situation: We have 3 bids all with different features and attractions. I/We have selected a panel of 18 (it was 12, 6 more are about to be asked) coaches from all over the globe. Most of the 18 are not European. We will give these 18 a breakdown of the bids and ask them to vote. A clear winner will selected. In case of a tie, I will have a casting vote.

For clarity, no coach from one of the countries putting forward a bid will have a vote. The only committee members to vote will be the TD and the FD, for obvious reasons. I only vote if tied.



That's from earlier in this thread. The process was clear.

Some personal thoughts.

I suspect that one of the main reasons Amsterdam won the vote was that it is a major city with lots of attractions to attendees outside of the BB itself coupled with the fact that it has excellent international transport links and is therefore very accessible.
It's worth considering that the other bid locations may not have drawn as many coaches, Amsterdam may be a 'victim' of it's own popularity.
Or we could have ended up with a location that could take all that wanted to attend but may have been a less 'international' event.
Notorious_jtb - Jan 10, 2011 - 12:47 PM
Post subject:
      Lycos wrote:

I suspect that one of the main reasons Amsterdam won the vote was that it is a major city with lots of attractions to attendees outside of the BB itself coupled with the fact that it has excellent international transport links and is therefore very accessible.


I also suspect that the international transport links were a BIG factor.
longfang - Jan 10, 2011 - 12:54 PM
Post subject:
      Panico wrote:
I bet Del and the others will be there in a coffee shop anyway, World Cup or not World Cup Wink
Del, can I joinT you? Very Happy


If we don't get in in the next draw I will certainly look at having a very Roken weekend, hopefully LouisX will joinT us. Mon Bodo ami!
Chou - Jan 10, 2011 - 02:21 PM
Post subject:
Hello,

First of all, thanks for the great work by the organization. They sure did their best, but they didn't foresee the great expectation this tournament generated.

I'm the captain of the FEBL Team from Spain, and although i'm happy 'cos my team was chosen, i'd like to give my full support to those teams that didn't make it in the original draft, specially those from Spain. As Canales and Pako said, we are still 10 months away from the opening date, so it's logical thinking that a solution can be met. From what I've read, i think the best option is the one from Canales, finding a side place to hold the remaining matches. I know that Amsterdam has a great public transport system, so it doesn't really have to be next to the current place.

Please, don't take this the wrong way, but would it be possible for us to know which steps are being followed to try fixing this problem? Because this way we could possibly add new approaches instead of repeating what the organizators for sure have already thought.
daloonieshaman - Jan 10, 2011 - 05:52 PM
Post subject:
Money Talks
Teams you have until say Feb 1 to register and pay (the 450 whatever slots)

Feb1-Feb22
Second round of registers Pay up buddy
Get a place, "cause we have another 100 coaches"(for those not understanding this is an imaginary number) with the catch 22 clause if Lucy cannot sign a place by "March 15" refunds are issued

SIMPLE, DIRECT, AND PLEASING!
PUT UP OR SHUT UP!
Teg - Jan 11, 2011 - 12:49 AM
Post subject:
      Deathwing wrote:
      Teg wrote:
Just to ask, why the italian location (able to host 3.000+ players) was discarded in favour of a location not able to host all of us?


Just to answer this, the process was as follows:
      Lycos wrote:

So here is the up to date situation: We have 3 bids all with different features and attractions. I/We have selected a panel of 18 (it was 12, 6 more are about to be asked) coaches from all over the globe. Most of the 18 are not European. We will give these 18 a breakdown of the bids and ask them to vote. A clear winner will selected. In case of a tie, I will have a casting vote.

For clarity, no coach from one of the countries putting forward a bid will have a vote. The only committee members to vote will be the TD and the FD, for obvious reasons. I only vote if tied.



That's from earlier in this thread. The process was clear.

Some personal thoughts.

I suspect that one of the main reasons Amsterdam won the vote was that it is a major city with lots of attractions to attendees outside of the BB itself coupled with the fact that it has excellent international transport links and is therefore very accessible.
It's worth considering that the other bid locations may not have drawn as many coaches, Amsterdam may be a 'victim' of it's own popularity.
Or we could have ended up with a location that could take all that wanted to attend but may have been a less 'international' event.


It would be clear with a post with every locations and their offer, a post with the names of the voters and their vote.
If someone says "a bigger location is too expensive" I reply with the italian location, free and big enough. You can say "we prefer to have the amsterdam 'attractions' and leave at home many NAF members".
This is a good reply and I hope many NAF members will think at it in the next election.

To chose a location for it's popularity and not having the room for that popularity is a nonsense.
Leaving people out of the event makes the WC "a less 'international' event."

However, as said by Canales, we are going forward, we want the organization answer about the question:
"Can you add a side location in Amsterdam to let everyone take part of the international event?"
Pako - Jan 11, 2011 - 01:57 AM
Post subject:
Thing is that no feedback from NAF or NAF WC organization about working to get all NAF coaches in.

I have no problem with my team out. I was posting months ago about it, I was worried about it prior to got out.

Let consider to play 4 rounds each day. It will increase 25% number or allowed matches. Playing 8 rounds instead of 9, you can get all NAF players in.

Pros:

All NAF players that wanted to be in playing
Free time between rounds to socialize, smoking or tourist visiting
No side venue required

Cons:

More complex timetable (could be assumed, I guess) with gaps
Less rounds in the tourney (8 or even 7)

As Teg said. I just want to read that someone is considering something to get as most players in. That's it. Hope we are learning something.
lesya - Jan 11, 2011 - 04:45 AM
Post subject:
There's a date to comunicate the race played?
Thadrin - Jan 11, 2011 - 05:05 AM
Post subject:
If the chosen venue had been some vast 1000 capacity venue, with associated higher costs and transport problems, I wonder if all of those who are complaining so loudly about a process they likely know the same as I do about (that is, very very little) would then have been asking why it's so hard to get flights and why the event is do expensice and why wasn't a smaller venue chosen?

I'm lucky, my team is in. Unfortunately several friends from a couple of countries were less lucky. I trust those running this event to make it as awesome as possible for as many as possible. I do wonder how much they were expected - by the masses - to know in advance about attendance...I certainly didn't expect over 100 french players to be interested. How many of those would be playing outside France for the first time? Same for Spain, the UK and Italy? If there are - as I suspect - a large number of international tourney first-timers then I think it fully understandable to underestimate the numbers who have pre-registered.

Disclaimer: I'm nominally an RTO, but write merely as a member of very long standing, not any official capacity whatsoever that could be perceived frpm avatar and sig. I am just another joe schmoe looking forward to a great weekend in BB's spiritual home.
Volstagg - Jan 11, 2011 - 07:21 AM
Post subject:
      Thadrin wrote:
If the chosen venue had been some vast 1000 capacity venue, with associated higher costs and transport problems, I wonder if all of those who are complaining so loudly about a process they likely know the same as I do about (that is, very very little) would then have been asking why it's so hard to get flights and why the event is do expensice and why wasn't a smaller venue chosen?


Normally, the more people attending the cheaper it results (this not only applied to bloodbowl, but also to catering services, hosting and even transport). It's just a question of organization and time.

Almost 4 years waitig to play the biggest NAF/BB event and know I'm probably out because of lack of room. Maybe I get lucky and the 22nd Februar my Team is the chosen one, I don't know, and I still don't know what the wainting for.

Maybe you are not upset about knowing very very little, but I'm am!

I think I can complain about it!

And the point is not to say "boo how poor the organization is!" (it will be great anyway, and they will always have my support and gratitude), but lets try to make the best posible WC for EVERYONE!

I 'm attending this WC 99% (shit happens) whether I play it or not, because I don't want to miss it, and as I said before, once there if I have to collect rosters or to play over the bathroom's floor, I'll do it happily.

If it's not possible to find a bigger venue, or a second one, some other options were proposed: playing less matches per day, different timetables... paying 5-10€ extra each one won't wreck anybody's budget, but maybe you will get a nice room to play somewhere.

Just my two cents and the opinion of many spanish coaches that just want to play the game we love.
Notorious_jtb - Jan 11, 2011 - 07:32 AM
Post subject:
      Quote:

Thing is that no feedback from NAF or NAF WC organization about working to get all NAF coaches in.


The problem with feedback is that it can lead to all sorts of follow up unhappyness.
I am certain that things are being attempted, and I am sure announcements will be done as soon as anything is certain. I know I would want to try and stop the "bashing" as soon as possible if I was running the event.

I think the organisers do not want to give anyone false hope so they will not be discussing the steps publicly.
Dave - Jan 11, 2011 - 07:38 AM
Post subject:
We had a venue that could have carried more players. The problem is that venues in Amsterdam that can host 400+ people (within our configuration) are really, really REALLY expensive. The venue we gave earlier was not expensive (that's quite relatively) in the way of the room but was severely (SEVERELY) expensive for anything else we needed. Wages for bartenders, cleaners, hosts, costs for equipment and that was even before we started about a lunch.

You are talking about 1000+ people coming but currently there's not even close to that amount of coaches (pre)registered Imagine me paying the odd 100,000 euro's for a venue and then 'merely' 600 people show up .. that wouldn't cover the cost, at all.

And on a personal note: I really, really don't want to even risk losing any money on organizing a tournament for a game I also love.
Elyoukey - Jan 11, 2011 - 08:24 AM
Post subject:
i didn't see a post about 1000+ people coming.
Is the 100 000 euros a real number or just an example ?
now that we know exactelly the number of players (including the not-yet-in teams), is it to late to rent this 400+ room ?
how much would it cost ?
probably i am not the only one to be able to bring a sandwich and/or find food by myself, so a discount without food can be imagined ?
isn't it possible to just put on option on the room and pay it once you get all the fund ? meaning you know exactelly the amount of people to rent for and then don't loose any money.

please don't take it personally, we are trying understand why our friends cannot come, and to understand we need informations.
Yamagata - Jan 11, 2011 - 09:25 AM
Post subject:
Hi all,

I only want to say that if there's any chance (that i am sure there is) for all of us to participate in such a great event that is the World Cup, knowing now that there are such a number of people interested in travelling to Amsterdam to take part of it, and considering that there is still enough time to look for a place to satisfy all of us, you should try to find another place and avoid leaving people out of the event.

I think we all should have the opportunity to live the experience of the Naf World Cup. Seems very very unfair to me that the chance to take part of this tournament relies on the fact that my number gets out on a draw. We all should be there despite the country where the event takes place and the capacity of the local. I am sure that all the people that at this moment is out of the tournament prefers to pay any amount of money and play in the street (for example) that staying at home blaming the fact that a draw and a place without enough space took out the opportunity to be part of it.

Please make and effort and give all of us the pleasure to be there.

Thanks in advance and sorry for my basic english

Yamagata
obeliz - Jan 11, 2011 - 09:40 AM
Post subject:
      Pako wrote:
Thing is that no feedback from NAF or NAF WC organization about working to get all NAF coaches in.

I have no problem with my team out. I was posting months ago about it, I was worried about it prior to got out.

Let consider to play 4 rounds each day. It will increase 25% number or allowed matches. Playing 8 rounds instead of 9, you can get all NAF players in.

Pros:

All NAF players that wanted to be in playing
Free time between rounds to socialize, smoking or tourist visiting
No side venue required

Cons:

More complex timetable (could be assumed, I guess) with gaps
Less rounds in the tourney (8 or even 7)

As Teg said. I just want to read that someone is considering something to get as most players in. That's it. Hope we are learning something.


I think is a great idea.

Sorry for my poor english, but I try to explain my opinion.
Spanish Team it's IN but a lot of friends of many countries are OUT. I hope it would be the best bloodbowl party. And for it wee need IN all the people who want come.


I'm sure the organization are working to fix the problem, and they have all my suport.
Pako - Jan 11, 2011 - 10:06 AM
Post subject:
I'll never stop to say that I'm with the organizers. We all appreciatte their work, no matter our opinion about present situation is.

We have a problem now. A problem that maybe we will not have in future editions, but one that is here now.

I guess NAF WC organization is trying to get the best. But it will be welcome to know if they consider anything. No false hope for me. Feedback is only giving they our support if it is.

I also assume problems derived from such a big city like Amsterdam to hire a venue. Only you, guys, know how it works. But for many people (some of them bussiness people) sounds strange that you cannot get a pre-option to hire place. Or to get a new place or timetable. Is not a criticism, is just a point of view.

People in or people out doesn't really matter. All BloodBowl players for sure will enjoy a 600 people tourney more than a 450 people tourney without some friends.

Go for it!
Darkson - Jan 11, 2011 - 10:22 AM
Post subject:
      Teg wrote:
I'll be very happy if the organizers can find an additional location near to the main location to allow everyone to take part of the event.
Please let us know if this is possible.

And yet you've got people moaning on this thread that players at WCI had to play in the White hart (a 5min walk from Warhammer World).
LouisX - Jan 11, 2011 - 10:31 AM
Post subject:
I wasn't picked to go but I'm 100% behind the organizers. They are doing an incredible job on this. Everybody is crying coz they don't have a ticket yet and they can't be with their friends and everything. Come on, we're not in 1st grade.

If you ever organized an event you can try to imagine the amount of work they're pulling out. Before finishing the job you gotta get a good start. That's what they're doing by providing the best there is for the 420 players who are already meant to come. Once the biggest part is done, it will be time to see how to fit some more people.

I felt I had to be a little bit supportive on this one after all the whinning I've seen so far. I trust my batavians friends even though i didn't get a ticket you little bastards :p
Clan_Skaven - Jan 11, 2011 - 11:28 AM
Post subject:
any chnces of future WC's being in North America, or is it always going to be in Europe?
Notorious_jtb - Jan 11, 2011 - 12:04 PM
Post subject:
      Clan_Skaven wrote:
any chnces of future WC's being in North America, or is it always going to be in Europe?


That is a discussion for another day/thread. But it seems unlikely due to the relative number of coaches on the European continent vs North America.
Anything can happen though and maybe Canada will put in a bid for 2015 edition............
Volstagg - Jan 11, 2011 - 12:21 PM
Post subject:
      LouisX wrote:
I wasn't picked to go but I'm 100% behind the organizers. They are doing an incredible job on this. Everybody is crying coz they don't have a ticket yet and they can't be with their friends and everything. Come on, we're not in 1st grade.


I wasn't either picked and I will try to go even if I can't play, just because it's gonna be great and don't want to miss it. No one is crying here, we are saying just what we feel and try to give ideas/suggestions.

      LouisX wrote:
If you ever organized an event you can try to imagine the amount of work they're pulling out. Before finishing the job you gotta get a good start. That's what they're doing by providing the best there is for the 420 players who are already meant to come. Once the biggest part is done, it will be time to see how to fit some more people.


I don't have to imagine anything cause I know what is it to organize a Tourney and to loss money with it (not to say time and headaches). Fortunately I also know that there are always helping hands willing to help and find solutions to the problems that might come. Thats why so many of us ( in and out of this Tourney ) are here.
LouisX - Jan 11, 2011 - 01:51 PM
Post subject:
Your two last sentences sum up what I'm saying Smile We'll have the best Wc and things can only improve thanks to many guys here.
Teg - Jan 12, 2011 - 01:13 AM
Post subject:
      Darkson wrote:
      Teg wrote:
I'll be very happy if the organizers can find an additional location near to the main location to allow everyone to take part of the event.
Please let us know if this is possible.

And yet you've got people moaning on this thread that players at WCI had to play in the White hart (a 5min walk from Warhammer World).


Maybe we cannot write in good english but if I understand the posts in this thread about White hart are positive.
I played there in WCI and it was very good solution to allow everyone to take part, many spanish players played there as well and we hope that in WCII will be possible to have a similar solution.

And moaning about 5 min walk is better than moaning about been left at home Wink
Pako - Jan 12, 2011 - 01:35 AM
Post subject:
      LouisX wrote:
I wasn't picked to go but I'm 100% behind the organizers. They are doing an incredible job on this. Everybody is crying coz they don't have a ticket yet and they can't be with their friends and everything. Come on, we're not in 1st grade.


Not me. Let me show you:

25th January 2010

      Pako wrote:
Maybe it was already asked, but considering that almost 300 people join the first edition, and I guess we expect a lot more for the second one... is there any consideration to give priority to the teams that joined the first World Cup edition? Or all we just should to be aware to inscribe?


I'm saying what I think about it. Sometimes hardly than others, but I'm saying the same things from the very beginning, not just after draw... Evil or Very Mad
LouisX - Jan 12, 2011 - 04:13 AM
Post subject:
Anyway, some moderation and patience are deeply needed around here. Especially that Spain will be second again.
Rodders - Jan 12, 2011 - 06:22 AM
Post subject:
      Notorious_jtb wrote:
      Clan_Skaven wrote:
any chnces of future WC's being in North America, or is it always going to be in Europe?


That is a discussion for another day/thread. But it seems unlikely due to the relative number of coaches on the European continent vs North America.
Anything can happen though and maybe Canada will put in a bid for 2015 edition............

I'd have to check but i think there are more NAF registered coaches in north America than Europe.

So I hope so otherwise its a big "eurobowl(and friends)" not a world cup
Notorious_jtb - Jan 12, 2011 - 07:19 AM
Post subject:
      Rodders wrote:
      Notorious_jtb wrote:
      Clan_Skaven wrote:
any chnces of future WC's being in North America, or is it always going to be in Europe?


That is a discussion for another day/thread. But it seems unlikely due to the relative number of coaches on the European continent vs North America.
Anything can happen though and maybe Canada will put in a bid for 2015 edition............

I'd have to check but i think there are more NAF registered coaches in north America than Europe.

So I hope so otherwise its a big "eurobowl(and friends)" not a world cup


Interesting, I had not checked the actual data. hmmmm
lunchmoney - Jan 12, 2011 - 08:17 AM
Post subject:
      Notorious_jtb wrote:

Interesting, I had not checked the actual data. hmmmm

a quick glance at the ranking page shows 21 pages of coaches for USA, 36 pages for UK. of course that doesnt take into consideration which of those coaches are active. but anyways this is not on topic, so appologies there Embarassed
Notorious_jtb - Jan 12, 2011 - 08:29 AM
Post subject:
      lunchmoney wrote:
      Notorious_jtb wrote:

Interesting, I had not checked the actual data. hmmmm

a quick glance at the ranking page shows 21 pages of coaches for USA, 36 pages for UK. of course that doesnt take into consideration which of those coaches are active. but anyways this is not on topic, so appologies there Embarassed


Lets take this discussion here:
http://thenaf.net/index.php?name=PNphpBB2&file=viewtopic&p=75796#75796
lesya - Jan 12, 2011 - 09:04 AM
Post subject:
[quote="Rodders"]I'd have to check but i think there are more NAF registered coaches in north America than Europe.[/quote]

21 page of american VS 35 of only UK...

sorry pal, but European guys are more then extraeuropean
Thadrin - Jan 12, 2011 - 09:29 AM
Post subject:
That statement fails to take into account that the number of pages is not related to number of coaches, as most coaches will have used more than one team. There are several with rankings on all 24.
Notorious_jtb - Jan 12, 2011 - 11:01 AM
Post subject:
      Thadrin wrote:
That statement fails to take into account that the number of pages is not related to number of coaches, as most coaches will have used more than one team. There are several with rankings on all 24.


indeed see here:
http://thenaf.net/index.php?name=PNphpBB2&file=viewtopic&p=75796#75796
Sebco - Jan 12, 2011 - 11:04 AM
Post subject:
In my opinion, question isn't only how many coaches ere there in each country. It's also how many coaches attend to tournaments in these countries. There are a lot of big tournaments in Europe (2 tournaments in France with more than 100 coaches in 2010, one with even 144 to only give an example). It's not because american coaches are less numerous or do like less coming to tournaments. That may be because of long distances in the country. But, according to me, a WC in Europe will have more coaches than a WC in United States or Canada.

That said, I would like the 3rd WC to take place in North America if possible, as it is the WORLD cup and so I don't want it to always take place in Europe.


But, well, let's seriously talk about it after WC II. Wink
Thadrin - Jan 12, 2011 - 11:41 AM
Post subject:
I'm now wondering how many Europeans have played in American tournaments, and vice versa.
Teg - Jan 12, 2011 - 01:07 PM
Post subject:
      Lucy wrote:
For those who lost in the first draft.

We're looking for options to get everybody in. Since the final draw will be done in a months time and many things can change, we can't make any promises.
If everything stays as it is and nothing changes (and nobody withdraws) and we can't get the options we're looking at, then only two teams would fall out.

Lucy


Thanks
Hachablanca - Jan 12, 2011 - 02:01 PM
Post subject:
Lucy wrote:
For those who lost in the first draft.

We're looking for options to get everybody in. Since the final draw will be done in a months time and many things can change, we can't make any promises.
If everything stays as it is and nothing changes (and nobody withdraws) and we can't get the options we're looking at, then only 2 teams would fall out.

Lucy

Thanks Very Happy
Lucy - Jan 12, 2011 - 02:05 PM
Post subject:
I had to edit my post from 2 to 4.

Lucy
Canales - Jan 12, 2011 - 04:55 PM
Post subject:
Thanks for the update, Lucy. It (finally) puts the matter under a different light.
LouisX - Jan 13, 2011 - 03:36 AM
Post subject:
Whatdidisaybeforenobodywaslisteningtomeandnowimright :p
Pako - Jan 13, 2011 - 06:33 AM
Post subject:
Appreciatte that.

No expectatives put on you. Just support. We all agree you are doing your best. But feedback was needed.

Thanks.
daloonieshaman - Jan 13, 2011 - 06:21 PM
Post subject:
      Sebco wrote:
In my opinion, question isn't only how many coaches ere there in each country. It's also how many coaches attend to tournaments in these countries. There are a lot of big tournaments in Europe (2 tournaments in France with more than 100 coaches in 2010, one with even 144 to only give an example). It's not because american coaches are less numerous or do like less coming to tournaments. That may be because of long distances in the country. But, according to me, a WC in Europe will have more coaches than a WC in United States or Canada.

That said, I would like the 3rd WC to take place in North America if possible, as it is the WORLD cup and so I don't want it to always take place in Europe.


But, well, let's seriously talk about it after WC II. Wink


The numbers come from France being another small country. Just about everyone can drive an hour and be there.
LouisX - Jan 14, 2011 - 04:21 AM
Post subject:
      Quote:
The numbers come from France being another small country. Just about everyone can drive an hour and be there.


Not really. It's like Florida size wise. But still for you, it is obviously much smaller than your country. Anyway, having 100 coachs is still better than having 50 if we're logical. You might have more coach than France but USA is more like Europe than Belgium Wink We gather much more people more regulary than you do.

Instead of trying to get the WC 'because your the USA or Canada', you should organize the North american cup. Its success would be a much better incentive than "we're bigger than you".
BiBi - Jan 14, 2011 - 04:39 AM
Post subject:
      daloonieshaman wrote:

The numbers come from France being another small country. Just about everyone can drive an hour and be there.


Let me guess, geography wasn't your forte at school ? Rolling Eyes
Thadrin - Jan 14, 2011 - 04:42 AM
Post subject:
      LouisX wrote:
Not really. It's like Florida size wise.


French Florida?
LouisX - Jan 14, 2011 - 05:50 AM
Post subject:
      Thadrin wrote:
      LouisX wrote:
Not really. It's like Florida size wise.


French Florida?


Obviously. The home of Amsterdam gay porn *private joke inside*
Panico - Jan 14, 2011 - 07:06 AM
Post subject:
      LouisX wrote:
      Thadrin wrote:
      LouisX wrote:
Not really. It's like Florida size wise.


French Florida?


Obviously. The home of Amsterdam gay porn *private joke inside*

Did you watch us on DVD? Laughing Wink *private joke inside*
Sebco - Jan 14, 2011 - 12:38 PM
Post subject:
From North to South, France is 1000 kilometers. From East to West, it's also around 1000 kilometers (well, it depends where exactly). So it can be 1 hour by plane but not by car! Smile

I live in Chambéry, in the Alps Mountains and Amsterdam is 1000 kilometers from home. It won't be longer for me to reach Amsterdam than to reach some french tournaments in Brittany for example. For french coaches living in Paris, in the North of France or in the East of France, Amsterdam is less far than Toulouse, where there's the biggest french tournament (144 coaches as said before). Wink
Marco_Gianni - Jan 15, 2011 - 02:46 AM
Post subject:
hum... 156 actually Sebco Wink
Sebco - Jan 15, 2011 - 03:57 PM
Post subject:
Oops. I was still speaking of Rugbowl 2009 and not Rugbowl 2010.

PS : Your signature concerns Rugbowl 2008, it's even worse ! Smile
Babs - Jan 16, 2011 - 04:42 AM
Post subject:
OK. I'm an RTO so I'm involved in this, however I think that there is a conflict of ideals here.

Some people are approaching this tournament as 'Blood Bowl world party' where everyone who wants to come can come.

However, that was clearly not my ideal. My ideal was that it would be a 'world cup' (hence the name) where there is a process of competition before your team can even enter.

To me, this is the issue. Everyone is expecting to come. Well guess what - not everyone can. In my mind, there should have been a selection process to work out who is coming and who is not. Last World cup, we (Australia) only had _ONE_ team come. We had a large discussion on it and the community supported that team, even though people didn't go they supported the team, as the team was _representing_ them - much the same way as the Olympics works.

However, this is not happening in the countries where there is a problem with too many teams. My suggestion would have been for these countries to have some method of working out representatives (by region, ranking, a knockout tournament, whatever) so they can work out their team.

This would be much the same way that each individual country works out who their players are for a the football World Cup - it is up to the coach and their football federation to decide. Some good players miss out because of injury, same here - the best BB players may not be able to make the World Cup for various reasons either.

So to me the issue is that the RTO doesn't seem to have had any say in team makeup or a complete lack of discussion between teams as to who will 'represent' their country and the rest of the players. Whose fault is that? Not sure. I'm not saying that the RTO should become some authoritarian figure - but there should be a selection process.

This has not happened as some people have expected this to work like 'Blood Bowl world party' and anyone who wants to come can - but is that a realistic expectation? I don't know many competitions where anyone who wants to enter can, at the very top level of competition.

This is all my personal opinion and does not reflect the NAF. Here in Oz, I tried to get some kind of discussion on ranking happening, but there was a strong desire to be more informal about it. The team who came in 2007 went and organised themselves and registered themselves as a team. The rest of us are planning a meeting at the 'Blood Bowl nationals' on 22 and 23 January.

So to me, this is a clash of ideals. I don't think the 'world party' ideal can work easily as an 'open' tournament with unlimited places.
Marco_Gianni - Jan 16, 2011 - 07:47 AM
Post subject:
I'm quite agree with your point of view but that's definitly not the main stream here in Europe...

The NAF World Cup is considered as the biggest international tournament ever and that's why so many players want to come and throw block dices against some people they would never have met in others circumstances. The first NWC was open and no one has been refused, it was the perfect place to meet US and Australian players (and many others!). Most of the players who were at Nottingham want to come again to Amsterdam and the ones who weren't there four years ago wouldn't miss the second WC for anything in the world! That's quite understandable...

The fact is that the NAF has never annouced an exclusive event, based on the players level (as the Eurobowl is), so the Wild Wide Open NAF World Cup Myth has followed its way Wink

Another thing is that a lot of players don't want to base a selection upon a ranking and the level of play. Bloodbowl is considered as a game for lucky bastards (where it's always the sames who win Wink) and taking it too seriously, with a competitive spirit, is disclaimed as an error and even a danger. See some players community - Magic the Gathering for instance - and you'll see all what the BB players community wants to avoid: arrogance, bad spirit, cheating...

I personnaly think that this point of view is a bit hypocrite as Bloodbowl is a sport game when we're all involved in Leagues, tournaments, rankings, national championship... The competitive aspect of our game is obvious!

Anyway, let the world Cup be the Bloodbowl Party you're talking about, and let's be happy to meet all together (if possible) to celebrate and dedicate our laughs and disapointments to (bloody!) Nuffle.
dwarfcoach - Jan 16, 2011 - 08:14 AM
Post subject:
      Marco_Gianni wrote:

Anyway, let the world Cup be the Bloodbowl Party you're talking about, and let's be happy to meet all together (if possible) to celebrate and dedicate our laughs and disapointments to (bloody!) Nuffle.


Amen brother!

I see nothing wrong with this, in fact I positively encourage this community spirit with every fiber of my being!!

I can completely understand what Babs is saying, that the WC seems to be straying from a real 'best of each country meeting to decide best of the best' to a 'huge bundle of as many coaches from as many places in the world all celebrating our hobby'. I for one think this second option is much more preferable.
Bloodbowl events for me have always been about meeting fellow BB players, chatting about tactics, new developments in the game, meeting guys you've only chatted to online before, having a great laugh. That is why I went to the Blood Bowl in Nottingham. That is why I have attended the Dutch Open many times, it's meeting up with BB guys I probably will not see for another year to 18 months, playing some hard fought games and catching up.

Does it meet the original 'elite playing elite from as many countries possible' format? No.

Does it mean the 'biggest event in the BB world, a very rare chance to have an amazing 3 days in a row of BB gaming against some of the best players in the BB community'? Hell yes!

It's only every four years, gotta be done if you ask me and much respect to those currently working on it...
DOA - Jan 16, 2011 - 12:38 PM
Post subject:
Can you tell us how we can pay the inscription of our teams?
Thanks
Lycos - Jan 16, 2011 - 01:53 PM
Post subject:
There is a specialist / separate site set up we will release for this when the date is up. Its easier and more efficient to handle it this way. This site only handles Pay Pal payments which is restrictive and we want manage the funds away from normal main stream accounts.

We appreciate some of you will want to do a simple bank transfer. We are doing all we can to make the process simple.
Lycos - Jan 16, 2011 - 02:51 PM
Post subject:
Interesting points in your post above Babs and as you can see from the replies you have had so far, many in Europe can understand "where you are coming from" so to speak.
But it's not that clear in Europe. There are so many great coaches. How do you pick who is best?

I think this is why Marco and Dwarfcoach post as they do.. We all know there will be some great coaches there, I think they just wanna have fun and see everyone....
Darkson - Jan 16, 2011 - 06:00 PM
Post subject:
      dwarfcoach wrote:
I can completely understand what Babs is saying, that the WC seems to be straying from a real 'best of each country meeting to decide best of the best' to a 'huge bundle of as many coaches from as many places in the world all celebrating our hobby'. I for one think this second option is much more preferable.

+1 - the best dressed man speaks the truth.
Pako - Jan 17, 2011 - 06:45 AM
Post subject:
"Best Coaches of every country" are free to organize a team and join WC. And then try to win it.

I absolutely agree with WC as a party for all NAF players in the world.

The point here is the one refered by Marco_Gianni. If you start to organize WC for the best ones, regionals to get a place and so on, you're killing Halflings, Goblins, friendship and party and beers between and after matches as occurs in other games.

Let the game free. Take your Country ProTeam and come to beat my friendly and drunked team. We were 5th past WC... Twisted Evil
Diablange - Jan 17, 2011 - 09:03 AM
Post subject:
      Pako wrote:
Let the game free. Take your Country ProTeam and come to beat my friendly and drunked team. We were 5th past WC... Twisted Evil

We were also a team of friends with an important part of drunk among us specially the days 2 and 3 and we ended up... third... Very Happy

Sometimes it does not take (only Wink) powergame strategy to have a good time and also score good results.

I think the example can even be taken to the highest level with the Azes, as they are a bunch of (ok, lucky bastards, yes) friends enjoying the same game... Smile
daloonieshaman - Jan 17, 2011 - 10:55 AM
Post subject:
So what is the NAF World Cup?
only 2 choices here

A cup of the best teams around the world aka 1 TEAM PER COUNTRY!!!!!!!!
or
A free for all with some kind of weird team format.

Make up your mind
Marco_Gianni - Jan 17, 2011 - 01:34 PM
Post subject:
Well, my point of view is that the two events deserve to be...

A "real" world cup should be a competitive tournament, including selections and why not 1 team per nation.
The present World Cup is rather an open world tournament (and I must say I like it, to avoid any misunderstanding), where anybody can come and win without having defeated the best players in the world and, as a matter of fact, I know what I'm talking about Wink

I don't think that powergaming doesn't fit with fun and friendship. I don't think that it's possible to win a Bloodbowl game without having any pleasure. I'm quite sure that all of us are pleased when we win and, finally, not so affected by a loss. The opposition between powergaming and good spirit is a nonsense imho. For instance Eurobowl 2010 has been (proudly) won by a particularly friendly (Spanish) EDIT: english team, all very good players with a very good spirit, and the people who were there (for EB or Eur'Open Bowl, the individual side event) have spent an exciting and pleasant moment during these 2 days.

But maybe all this is off topic regarding the initial thread theme ?
Sebco - Jan 17, 2011 - 01:57 PM
Post subject:
EuroBowl 2010 has been won by the English team, not the Spanish one. Taht said, I totally agree with you. Wink
Marco_Gianni - Jan 17, 2011 - 04:06 PM
Post subject:
oops... sorry mates Embarassed

How do you call that ? A slip ? Laughing
Babs - Jan 17, 2011 - 04:23 PM
Post subject:
I still think that we are left here with limited places. Given that there is more interest than places available, what is the best way to deal with that?

...

And I still think that the 'friendly' spirit of coaches will be present regardless. Eurobowl is a prime example of that, whether the teams are representatives or not. I think that this 'representative' ideal that I have has stemmed from the first world cup where Oz/Nz were only allocated _one_ team. This perhaps changed the perspective, and everyone in europe had a different idea (and maybe the northern hemisphere!). Interestingly the people who attended in 2007 perhaps also saw it more as a 'world party' than a 'world cup'.

That said, the original idea was for it to be a 'world cup' and I saw that some countries had more teams than others as representative of the total number of BB players in that area (which has already been discussed...)

What is also an interesting factor is the 'cost' of attending. Time off work and $$$ from here in Aus is very high to attend a european tournament. Airfares alone are around $2000 return, as well as a long time there and back, meaning time off work etc etc.

When such effort is required to attend, I personally expect some level of competitiveness for 'their country'. The story I heard about the french national anthem being sung emotionally by the winning team in 2007 was evocative (I heard also that they were also very intoxicated for some of the tournament too!)

Anyway, this rambled post is simply stating that there are limited places, many more than there were available in 2007. I see it as a shame that there has to be a 'lottery' to see who goes and who doesn't, as I would have preferred some kind of qualification system to work out who went and who didn't.

That's it really.
daloonieshaman - Jan 17, 2011 - 06:29 PM
Post subject:
Well to late now they have made their decision.

We know that this is not going to be a World Cup.

You can call it that but you can also call a skunk a rose.
Tripleskull - Jan 18, 2011 - 02:01 AM
Post subject:
It’s pretty funny for an American to have a rigid definition of world cup. Very Happy

I think it’s very sad, that there are a limited number of places, but I can understand why it is so. Handeling 600-700 people would be a handfull. And I’m pretty sure, the organizers are doing their best.

It has been stated very clearly, that the world cup is not planned to stay in Europe, and reducing the number of players by limiting the number of teams from each country to one would be a disaster in my opinion. The greatness of this world cup lies not in the single best team from all countries being there, but in the amazing amount of bb players present, including most of the world elite. That being said, any nation should be allowed at least one team, but I guess it’s already so?
Mootaz - Jan 18, 2011 - 03:05 AM
Post subject:
Question regarding the tournament rules:
http://thenaf.net/index.php?name=PNphpBB2&file=viewtopic&t=5088

Illegal Procedure is not in effect. I suppose the 4 minute rule is also not in effect? I think so but should be clearly stated.
Doubleskulls - Jan 19, 2011 - 10:31 PM
Post subject:
      Babs wrote:
Some people are approaching this tournament as 'Blood Bowl world party' where everyone who wants to come can come.


Sounds great to me. Although I can appreciate people who want a more structured and competitive format I find the idea of selection and qualification elitist and slightly distasteful. Everyone come and party and play Smile I'd rather go to that tournament than one people have to qualify for.
Babs - Jan 20, 2011 - 03:45 AM
Post subject:
Doubleskulls - so you find Eurobowl distasteful?

(I hear what you are saying. Just look at the waves the Ausbowl has created close to home for us. I'm just stating that _given_ restricted numbers, I think it's a better system than a lottery).
Doubleskulls - Jan 20, 2011 - 04:21 AM
Post subject:
Since I've never been to EuroBowl and aren't likely to I'm ambivalent. I am very keen to go to the WC but I can't justify the cost. If I couldn't go because I wasn't allowed I'd be much more concerned. I think there would be less waves if the venue accommodates everyone who wants to come. Then you don't have to worry about selecting one representative team or restricting the number of teams. The only reason the WC has a problem is that the venue can't accommodate everyone who wants to come. Anything that restricts attendance causes problems. Voluntarily reducing the number of attendees just makes it worse imo.
Grumbledook - Jan 20, 2011 - 05:02 AM
Post subject:
babs just fyi the eurobowl has caused certain amounts of controversy over the years with regards to who gets to play or not

each country decides among themselves how their team is picked and methods differ for different nations

I know some people are put out of place as they feel that you need to be in a clique to get picked

running qualification tournaments can also cause other events to get an over competitive feel and some don't want anything to do with that

nothing is without its problems ;]
Glowworm - Jan 20, 2011 - 09:44 AM
Post subject:
      Doubleskulls wrote:
      Babs wrote:
Some people are approaching this tournament as 'Blood Bowl world party' where everyone who wants to come can come.


Sounds great to me. Although I can appreciate people who want a more structured and competitive format I find the idea of selection and qualification elitist and slightly distasteful. Everyone come and party and play Smile I'd rather go to that tournament than one people have to qualify for.


Im one of the "lucky" ones who's got a place already (as have many players how have posted here I assume)

I intend to do both, play 3 days of competative BB and enjoy the party!

Ive never been to Eurobowl (and doubt if ill ever go, probably not a good enough player) so should I just stay at home for this one?

How do we pick who goes? if I get placed at a small tournament say Newquay (12-16 players) do i then qualify for Thrud or spiky (40-60+) and do well there do i get a chance to apply. And who has earnt the right to tell me not to go!!

Sorry, that really doesnt work for me, I have a friend who attends MTG tourneys (just using that as an example, not singling it out) and all he ever talks about is the Ulta-competative nature of the games.

thats not how I want to see BB go, i like the informal attitude that most players have, yes its still very competative but is fun as well.

Lets not forget this is a game (a game we all love but still a game) theres never be an "Elite" class of player and i feel you sugestion is starting down that road, please correct me if Im wrong.
If you are going (by whatever selection proccess) Ill happily buy you a pint, shake your hand and discuss this further.
Marco_Gianni - Jan 20, 2011 - 01:26 PM
Post subject:
I think that things shouldn't be mixed up that way.

MTG community is mainly made up by teens, that's why the spirit is so arrogant and unpleasant. I believe in the maturity of the BB players community to avoid such behaviours.

As everybody say "it's just a game"... Well, the purpose of any game is to win, isn't it ? Why should it be a shame or a threat for the community health ? Aren't we clever enough to be involved in a game and have normal relationships toward our opponents in the same time ?

Eurobowl is not open because each Nation is represented by only one 8-players team. That makes sense! This competition is very interesting for those who play but also for each national community (just like for a football or rugby torny... Soon the 6 Nations tournament begins, beware to your ass you Scots!! ^^). Beside this competition an individual open tournament has been held. That was an excellent idea.

The NWC is not in the same move. People come from (very) far away and really want to participate to an open big party. And that's gonna be great! Very Happy

Anyway I just want to say that you don't need to be scared of "the way things are turning in"
Deathwing - Jan 20, 2011 - 04:25 PM
Post subject:
It was a very conscious decision last time around that the 1st WC would be a big party and celebration of the NAF community. A chance to get as many old friends who could make it in one place at one time and of course a great opportunity to make new ones and further strengthen our international ties. We also wanted to give as many coaches as possible the chance to play in a team environment and represent their country regardless of ability.

Some people at the time were very clear that we were heading for a disaster and that the WC should be about putting the strongest players from each country in an elite competition, as was first mooted back in the day. But then the WC would have probably simply ended up as Eurobowl + Aus + USA + Canada.

Now there's no reason such a competition couldn't go ahead in future to find the elite amongst the elite (organisation issues aside) but call it 'NAF World Championship' (or something more creative).

But in my opinion that's not what the World Cup should be about. We obviously had a few issues last time, but the vast majority of coaches came away with a huge grin and a lot of new friends. The indication of that success is clear in the numbers wanting to attend this time.

I believe it remains the biggest single tournament in terms of attendees and most international in terms of countries represented of any GW game system to date. Until October when that gets blown out of the water by a considerable margin. I wish people would stop and think about that and appreciate the mammoth organisational effort that is being undertaken here before being critical. Most of it is obviously intended as constructive, some of it is frankly churlish, but it all weighs and adds to the load.
Babs - Jan 20, 2011 - 04:38 PM
Post subject:
...and please don't hear me saying that 'elitist competition' is better. I'm just stating that I approached this considering limited places and had open discussions on Ausbowl.com about how to organise teams 'together'.

All I'm really commenting on is it's clear that many countries did not even consider that there wouldn't be enough spaces to fill interest, and there has been no discussion on working out how to rationalise their teams, because of the prevailing 'world party' ideal.

At the end of the day I'm on the same page as everyone else, disappointed that it's had to revert to a lottery style system to figure out who can come and who can't - when it could have been done a different way.

In saying this I'm trying to show that it isn't solely the organisers fault who have booked a venue with a clear number of teams and places in mind, however everyone 'expected' to be able to rock up and play - including _17_ teams from some countries!!! (My understanding is that is about 1/3 of the total number of attendees of the last one!)
Nazgob - Jan 24, 2011 - 03:22 AM
Post subject:
      glowworm wrote:
How do we pick who goes? if I get placed at a small tournament say Newquay (12-16 players) do i then qualify for Thrud or spiky (40-60+) and do well there do i get a chance to apply. And who has earnt the right to tell me not to go!!
Didn't you come 4th at Newquay? Smile
Titouch - Jan 24, 2011 - 04:03 AM
Post subject:
Got your point Babs.

I have little to add to Marco's very good posts which reflect quite well my opinion. Just to make it concise and simple :

1) A key reason to why we in Europe are eager to attend to "the big open event" being this WC II is simply that we already have our competitive nations tournament : it is Eurobowl, works very well, and it is held each year except WC year.

2) Even if WC II will not be 100% competitive, do not worry, you'll get your ass kicked by top-notch teams if you come Wink Anyway, this is the strength of the Swiss system : competitive (or lucky) teams will end battling together in tough matches for the title. And those here for fun only will find their drunk counterparts as well Smile



Though, if you are missing a "1-team-per-nation-competitive-event" aside the big open BloodBowl fest of NAF WC, we could discuss a new schedule for international team tournaments : introduce a "WorldBowl" in the middle of the 4 years between each WC. It could simply be a worldwide nations cup, Eurobowl-type format but including non-European teams.

That would make the BB cycle look like this :

Year 1 : NAF WC, big feast, open format 6-man teams
Year 2 : Eurobowl, non-open 8-man teams
Year 3 : WorldBowl, non-open, x-man teams (to be discussed)
Year 4 : Eurobowl

And so on. That would make the first WorldBowl happen in 2013. Maybe the opportunity to test a competitive world event, outside Europe in front of WC 2015 ?


My 2 cents

Jerome/Titouch
Glowworm - Jan 24, 2011 - 06:05 PM
Post subject:
      Nazgob wrote:
Didn't you come 4th at Newquay? Smile


Yes, and 4th at Exciles......

your not helping any Laughing
Pako - Jan 28, 2011 - 06:06 AM
Post subject:
Couple of ideas about it:

First. Guys, Eurobowl is just a subproduct of the moment in which was firstly organized. Years ago, not many players can travel arround Europe to play. Right now, BloodBowl community is better organized and more and more people is playing the game.

I understand the idea of Eurobowl. I agree. And people of Spanish Team (hope some other Eurobowl players) are friends of mine.

Said that, I don't think Eurobowl is representative or even is fair.

"Each country decides the members of the team" is not right. In Spain veteran players of Spanish Team comes every year. You cannot enter into the team even if you're the best NAF Ranked player in the world.

I don't want anyone misunderstund me. I have no better ideas to define teams. I have no suggestions to improve Eurobowl, and I guess I will never come to play it and it's fine for me.

I'm just pointing out that Eurobowl is a tourney with one single team coming from each country, but not at all representative of a Eurobowl in terms of "best players of each country". I agree that probably 80% of them are there. But it is not the example, or at least an example like Euro football competition.

The question is that if you want to get a REAL Eurobowl or NAF World Cup, you should define properly the conditions to be qualified:

- Maybe regional/country tournaments to be qualified
- Maybe NAF ranking with the team to join in
- Maybe last year NAF results

Any of those criteria (IMO) will end in a over competitive BloodBowl enviroment to get the "semi-professional" places for those toruneys.

Most important thing.

You, guys, forgot that this is a dice game. Fucking lucky bastards can win a tourney rolling dice. I've seen Human full mighty blow team winning SkullCup Rolling Eyes

Bloodbowl is a game related with things that are not so common in other strategy, roleplaying or tabletop games.

I think taking it to the "elite-tourneys" is taking it colser to the other games, BTW those games that for all us are not comparable with Bloodbowl in terms of fun.

You can do legal dirty tricks, shout to your opponent, play drinking... that's Bloodbowl.

As said before, winners, 3rds or even 5ths in the past WC were people that join a team just for fun, independently of their personal results, and they get it.

From my point of view, every country (or group of players from a country) can organize a team, call it [Country] Team and try to get the best players of the country.

Then, come to the NAF WC and see what will hapen with you... Wink
Kithor - Feb 10, 2011 - 05:06 AM
Post subject:
In one of the multiple threads I read that the captains have to pay during February for the whole team. Could one of the organizers make a payment info thread with the date and the datas needed? Smile
Lucy - Feb 10, 2011 - 05:57 AM
Post subject:
We were planning to do that one week in advance.
So, around next monday.

Lucy
Kithor - Feb 10, 2011 - 06:08 AM
Post subject:
Thanks Lucy Smile
Chou - Feb 23, 2011 - 02:41 AM
Post subject:
One question on the payment: do you want us to send you a PM once we order the transfer?
Lucy - Feb 23, 2011 - 02:48 AM
Post subject:
Not needed.

We'll check the websites every few days.....
Teams whose payment arrived will be coloured in the "Registered Teams" thread.
If you see your team remain black while others are getting coloured in, then you should worry.

Lucy
Pako - Feb 23, 2011 - 03:21 AM
Post subject:
Thank you for all guys. See you in 2015.

P.S. Can I pay now my registration for wherever 2015? I still want to play NAF WC, don't know why... Rolling Eyes
Korgluk - Feb 23, 2011 - 08:39 AM
Post subject:
14 years playing bb, 11 years making leagues, 6 years making big tournaments and traveling around Europe... finally making NAF bigger...

Now I and my team will not play NAFWC, but a lot of looners will play!

It's better that I stop here my post!
Lucy - Feb 25, 2011 - 02:40 AM
Post subject:
Payment details for Paypal have been updated (see main "Sticky" thread).
Sorry for the delay.

Lucy
poundfist - Mar 01, 2011 - 12:05 PM
Post subject:
Maybe I am not fully clued in as to how the tournament rankings go, but as I see it if every tournament one plays affects one's standings in future tournaments, some of the fun will be lost. A coach with a high ranking will be discouraged from playing a non-competitive (or less-competitive) list for fun, as doing so might affect his standing at another tournament.

I am all for the notion that tournaments should be taken seriously, played competitively, and that the payers' scores should be recorded for ranking purposes. But for this game to remain fun and not become an actual pro sport I think seeding for every tournament should be random. "Invite-only" tournaments will discourage the guys who still enjoy playing Halflings and losing most of their games. Or worse, it won't discouage them; it will actively exclude them. Every tournament will be made up of the same 6 or 8 teams, played by the same coaches every time.
Dave - Mar 01, 2011 - 03:16 PM
Post subject:
I think there's a few things that may need some clearing up.
Each NAF member is allowed as many rankings as there's races in BB. You get a new ranking for every new race you play.

Actually there's even coaches who try to be the coach with the lowest ranking.

And also; invitational tournaments are excluded from the ranking with the exception of the Euro Bowl.

Does this clear up some of your questions?
Darkson - Mar 01, 2011 - 04:29 PM
Post subject:
I think he was more replying to Pako's* POV that the WC should be given to the "best" coaches.


* (I think it was Pako - might have been another one of his team not going, or someone else entirely in this thread).
Dave - Mar 01, 2011 - 11:43 PM
Post subject:
hmm rereading the last page you may well be right ... I sometimes lose the context a bit with several threads going along at the same time
Tiamo69 - Mar 02, 2011 - 06:40 AM
Post subject: UK Bank Charges???
FAO UK Attendees:

would be interested in hearing how you've all paid & how you've got on with your Banks...?


My delightful bank Abbey, which is now Santander (& should therefore be European)...

just tried to charge me £25 for the privilege of sending the money via IBAN... (this is in addition to the actual Currency Conversion charge!)

so, it looks like i'll be using PayPal! Sad

unless i get better advice from you lot, than i did from the Bank!


the other Bank option i have is Nat West...
but i hardly use rthis account.
lunchmoney - Mar 02, 2011 - 11:38 AM
Post subject: Re: UK Bank Charges???
      Tiamo69 wrote:
FAO UK Attendees:

would be interested in hearing how you've all paid & how you've got on with your Banks...?


My delightful bank Abbey, which is now Santander (& should therefore be European)...

just tried to charge me £25 for the privilege of sending the money via IBAN... (this is in addition to the actual Currency Conversion charge!)

so, it looks like i'll be using PayPal! Sad

unless i get better advice from you lot, than i did from the Bank!


Same bank. same issue. Am now waiting for paypal to clear funds.
Glowworm - Mar 03, 2011 - 03:42 PM
Post subject:
paid using IBAN with LLoyds, cost me £20 in charges which i had already calculated into the "team cost" (Entry fee + Charges + Tee shirt funds) and no waiting.....
Rodders - Mar 04, 2011 - 12:53 AM
Post subject:
paid using IBAN too with HSBC cost me £9 in charges
Tiamo69 - Mar 04, 2011 - 05:29 AM
Post subject:
glowworm / rodders.

cheers for replies.

£25 on an individual entry is money that iam definitely not willing to give to the Banks, especially considering recent events caused by them Nationally & Globally!

HSBC seem most reasonable then but £9 is still very steep for 1 person to cover.

Any UK Teams not paid yet that i could transfer money to?
if not it will have to be PP...

lunchmoney - anyone in your team in HSBC?
lunchmoney - Mar 05, 2011 - 03:37 PM
Post subject:
      Tiamo69 wrote:
lunchmoney - anyone in your team in HSBC?
I Not sure. But I have things in hand now.
Lucy - Sep 30, 2011 - 01:24 PM
Post subject:
One free spot in team 2 individual.
Please PM for details.

Lucy
generaljason - Oct 09, 2011 - 06:57 AM
Post subject:
Team Thunderbowl is out.

One of our members lost his job and can't go. This created a domino affect that solidified the resolve of another member that was also thinking of pulling out. This caused another member to get a refund on his plane ticket, leaving 3 guys holding the bag for an apartment that was charged for 6 heads. As of right now we can still cancel the apartment but lose the deposit.

With my NAF ticket and this deposit I'm out $400 not to go. Needless to say I'm completely heart broken and disappointed at this last minute development as I was looking forward to this for over 8 months - to take a team to Amsterdam. I was eager to finally meet Darkson, Lycos, Geggster, Grum, Deathwing, Lucy and countless others that I've chatted with over the years online but have never met face to face but what can you do about chaos?

I sincerely apologize on behalf of our league to the organizers of WCII for this development of having to back out but what can I do? I also extend my apologies to El Prat or any other team that was excluded from attending due to limits being meet due to our inclusion in the list of teams. I further hope that with 5 weeks notice than another European team that was on the waiting list still has time to organize their team to replace ours - and I hope you win the whole thing.

Best regards to all those involved, and I hope all you guys have a blast 5 weeks from now. Completely jealous. The Blood Bowl or the Dungeonbowl for me next time - that way I only have to worry about myself getting on that plane. Wink

Thank you Andre and Dave for all your hard work and hope these guys get you pickled before the weekend is out!

Sincerely,
Craig.
Lucy - Oct 09, 2011 - 10:36 AM
Post subject:
Terrible news. Sad to hear it Sad

I'll ask the other reserves to see what can be done with the free spot.

Too bad.....

Lucy
Darkson - Oct 09, 2011 - 12:44 PM
Post subject:
Just... d'oh! Sad
zootsuitjeff - Oct 09, 2011 - 01:46 PM
Post subject:
ahh that sucks. next time make sure everyone buys non refundable tickets 6 months out.
Pako - Oct 10, 2011 - 01:01 AM
Post subject:
      generaljason wrote:
I also extend my apologies to El Prat or any other team that was excluded from attending due to limits being meet due to our inclusion in the list of teams.


Nothing to apologize to El Prat, generaljason.

I am sorry you can not come. Sadly, these things happens independently of your commitement to come, which no one could doubt about.

My concerns were always about to improvable things from organization point of view, because I think all BB players want to be there, and want to have all NAF players there. As said, no apologies needed from you.

I just want to solidarize with you. No matter why, we probably are the ones who better understand your feelings now... I am so sorry about you.
Pako - Oct 10, 2011 - 01:28 AM
Post subject:
      Darkson wrote:
I think he was more replying to Pako's* POV that the WC should be given to the "best" coaches.


* (I think it was Pako - might have been another one of his team not going, or someone else entirely in this thread).


Sorry, I did not read it till today.

Wasn't me. I suggested to prioryze somehow past attendants to WC and players who wasn't join NAF just to come to WC.
All times are
Powered by PNphpBB2 © 2003-2009 The Zafenio Team
Credits