Author |
Message |
AnthonyTBBF |
|
Post subject:
Posted: Mar 12, 2003 - 09:56 PM
|
|
Joined: Feb 10, 2003
Toronto, ON
Posts: 1313
Location: Toronto, ON
Status: Offline
|
|
Quote:
I have no shame in admitting I copied this setup from AnthonyTBBF
LOL! I only used that against John's weedy Skaven when he was drunk. |
_________________ Anthony - Ex Presidente
www.xtbbf.org
Orion Cup - June 8, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
CoachGrodd |
|
Post subject:
Posted: Mar 12, 2003 - 11:28 PM
|
|
Joined: Feb 11, 2003
Posts: 23
Status: Offline
|
|
So far, I've yet to see why everybody was so upset when this team came out. Admittedly, the big guy was really powerfull, probably still is too powerfull, but the rest of the team still struggles with all the things chaos do and they're more expensive, and they have no apoth. I think they may have stumbled on a really balanced roster, almost by mistake. |
_________________ ========
Another message from the good people of Grodd Corp.
Obey Grodd.
|
|
|
|
|
GalakStarscraper |
|
Post subject:
Posted: Mar 13, 2003 - 06:26 AM
|
|
Ex-Rulz Committee
Joined: Feb 11, 2003
United States of America
Posts: 1562
Status: Offline
|
|
CoachGrodd wrote: So far, I've yet to see why everybody was so upset when this team came out.
Most folks saw this (including myself):
Foul Appearance on 4 Chaos Warriors and a kick-*ss Big Guy that gets you free 110k player .... is significantly greater than .... loss of apothecary and extra 10k for Warriors
Since the original roster had access to all the Big Guys and Stars normal for Chaos .... the the original BB Mag Nurgle's Rotter roster is preceived as automatically BETTER than the Chaos roster without question by several folks (again myself included).
The new roster makes the Rotters more stationary and very likely not ball handlers which is a normal trick for Chaos is to have one Chaos Warrior who can do ball handling. It also removes all the other Big Guy options and access to any star but Thrud (whose dumb enough to play for anyone). Finally it tones down the Big Guy who many feel is still too powerful .... I tried to argue for ST 5 130k on him, but couldn't convince the court of appeals.
Galak |
|
|
|
|
|
skummy |
|
Post subject:
Posted: Mar 13, 2003 - 07:58 AM
|
|
Joined: Feb 11, 2003
Posts: 506
Status: Offline
|
|
I'd rather just see him dropped to a 2 movement, which would limit his potential abuse. Don't think it will happen, though. |
_________________ The only thing to do with good advice is pass it on. It is never any use to oneself.
-Oscar Wilde
|
|
|
|
|
Terarin |
|
Post subject:
Posted: Mar 13, 2003 - 03:49 PM
|
|
Joined: Feb 27, 2003
United States of America
Posts: 6
Location: United States of America
Status: Offline
|
|
Sorry to be so behind... but when/where did the Rotters get updated? Same for the other revisions from BBM? GW's website is blocked here and all I have are the relavent BBMs. |
|
|
|
|
|
GalakStarscraper |
|
Post subject:
Posted: Mar 13, 2003 - 07:28 PM
|
|
Ex-Rulz Committee
Joined: Feb 11, 2003
United States of America
Posts: 1562
Status: Offline
|
|
Terarin wrote: Sorry to be so behind... but when/where did the Rotters get updated? Same for the other revisions from BBM? GW's website is blocked here and all I have are the relavent BBMs.
Well the BBM teams are experimental which means they were looking for feedback. As that feedback comes in the BBRC kicks back possible changes based on what the testing to date so far has shown.
http://www.blood-bowl.net/GWTeams/RevisedGWRosters.html
These are just POSSIBLE changes, but I try to keep it as absolutely as up to date as possible. Doesn't mean these are the final rosters ... just that they represent some of the latest semi-official thoughts on ways to fix or balance the rosters.
Galak |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Mar 14, 2003 - 07:51 AM
|
|
Joined: Feb 10, 2003
United States of America
Posts: 2319
Location: United States of America
|
|
My bad, yup 4 rotters....man I need some sleep. |
_________________ aka Rob (NAF #248)
President of the Lord Borak Fan Club
Founder of the GCLU
Commissioner, TO, Goblin King, NEBBN TSO
|
|
|
|
|
|